Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Remove rear seat on C172, legal?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Remove rear seat on C172, legal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Mar 2013, 14:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the low lands
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remove rear seat on C172, legal?

I was just wondering if it is legal to remove the rear seats of a C172 (EASA registered). I found a discussion on another forum, but only for FAA land: Flying with the rear seat removed - Page 2 - Pilots of America Message Board

Do you need a new W&B measurement?
Would it be reasonable to ask a owner of the aircraft (flight school) to remove the seats for a trip of several days?
jkveenstra is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2013, 14:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Up There!!!
Age: 61
Posts: 439
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Don't see why not.

Never thought about the W&B issue, but do know a friend who owns his own PA28 & has the rear seats removed. Not sure if he has done a W&B on it.
7of9 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2013, 14:40
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,622
Received 64 Likes on 45 Posts
Taking the rear seat out is no problem. If the aircraft is in a commercial operation, doing so should be treated as a maintenance activity, and requires a weight and balance amendment, but it's hardly complex.

Reinstalling it really should have maintenance staff oversight, and a maintenance release as it could be an occupant safety and liability issue if not documented properly.

Depending upon your national regulations, it might be an "elementary" task that the pilot can perform and sign for. If that is the case, that person is responsible for reading the maintenance manual on how to do it.

I have regularly used these aircraft as freighters, with only the pilot's seat installed.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2013, 19:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to do meat bombing in a 172. All seats out except the front left (mine!) and the RH door off as well.

Bluddy cold in winter, but quite legal.
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 18:37
  #5 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bluddy cold in winter, but quite legal.
Are you sure it's legal without an appropriate CRS? I don't think the Cessna manuals say how this should be accomplished eg floor loading etc..

In the good old days no one would question this sort of thing but in today's environment of litigation, I'm not so sure.
jxk is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 21:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From CAA website http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?ca...8&pagetype=90:
Minor and Major Modifications and Repairs

Regulation (EC) 1702/2003 (Subpart D, 21A 90-97 Inclusive) contains the EASA definitions of minor and major changes.
It defines a minor change as being "one that has no appreciable effect on the mass, balance, structural strength, reliability, operational characteristics, noise, fuel venting, exhaust emissions or other characteristics affecting the airworthiness".
By default, therefore, a change is considered major if it cannot be considered minor.
Since the change will have an appreciable effect on the balance of the aircraft, I suggest that unless this is something the plane is designed to do (ie - there are instructions to do it in the hand book with a different balance schedule) then it is technically a major change, so you need to get your local maintenance shop involved.

Replacement of seats is allowed under pilot maintenance -removal isn't (at least - I haven't seen where it is!). The definitions as to mods are different in EASA land and FAA land...

Note that I'm a student pilot - so this advice is worth as much as you paid for it...
riverrock83 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 00:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your supposed to do a re weigh after a paint respray!!! Remove seats other than in a manufacturer approved basis ie they have already done calculations would mean the aircraft is illegal !

Remove the seats and its empty weight would change as well as possibly C of G moments! That would bugger up your loading calculations as well as C of G calculations as the datum would change from the published datum for the aircraft.

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 26th Mar 2013 at 00:09.
Pace is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 07:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My flight school used to remove rear seats regularly. One 172 would have the seat removed to use the camera hatch for aerial photography. The other 172 was used as a back up tow plane and they would remove the rear seat when towing.

I would think you wouldn't need to re-weigh the plane, just weigh the seat. You already know the arm.
500ft is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 07:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Cessna was a jump ship in its first life and still has the static line hoop on the floor. It also has a parachute ops section in the AFM and has a para config weight and balance schedule.

It's permitted to remove and replace the seats as needed and you use the relevant load sheet. It even has a jump position load sheet to make the weight and balance calculations easier.
S-Works is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 10:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Remove the seats and its empty weight would change as well as possibly C of G moments! That would bugger up your loading calculations as well as C of G calculations as the datum would change from the published datum for the aircraft.
Rubbish, if you remove the seat and don't put anything on the floor in that area then it will not bugger up anything, I don't recall the exact weight of a 172 seat but assuming (not that you ever should in aviation) it is 10 kgs maximum, just do the W&B calculation with a weight of -10kgs for that arm. Simples.

Removing a seat in itself is never going to kill anyone, what might kill you however is the vast amount of gear that you can get in that area should it not be suitably tied down.
VP-F__ is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 11:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am being very pedantic but presuming the datums are set and the weight is set with seats installed removing them will change things even by a small amount! which maybe insignificant.
It just crossed my mind regarding strip and resprays requiring a re weigh and removing seats not? so pedantic yes

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 11:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Guys, It might be easy to weigh each rear seat, but you also need to find
their C of G. to be able to do the W+B calculations. (You also need to know where the datum point is located.)

The actual C of G of the seat, because of a seat's L shape, may be located in the space between the seat base and seat back. (which is interesting.)

Removing the seats will move the plane's C of G forward, increasing the stability... Making the plane fly more nose heavy.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 15:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Pace, point taken.

For what it is worth, if the seat was to weigh 10kg or even 15 kgs and you used to moment for the seat it would move the CofG forward by about 1cm by removing the seat, not a big deal!
VP-F__ is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 16:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CG-F

I realize the datum point will have moved only a tiny amount but the question was is it legal?
With the idea of a miss is as good as a mile the fact that the aircraft is out of its certificated weight and balance on which all the loading graphs are based on must surely mean its not legal anymore than giving your aircraft a new coat of paint on top of the existing paint without having the aircraft re weighed ?

Yes it is as stated a very pedantic point but surely could cause a legal problem in a paperwork exercise?

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 00:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: london
Age: 60
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least part of the answer to this question is in the poh and I think in the equipment list for that aircraft. I had this question in an oral exam about if one could remove and fly without wheel fairings, there is a section that shows which cessna parts are R (required), O (optional) and alternatives to each other etc. This will tell you if the seat is required or not, my guess is it is optional, but not the requirements for removal or reinstatement.

The c reg 172 I fly on floats has the back seats removed so its definitely doable

Last edited by custardpsc; 28th Mar 2013 at 00:25.
custardpsc is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 13:19
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the low lands
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought there would be a single answer to my question, but it seems that it is not so simple.

Just to let you know about the background of my question. A few weeks ago I suggested to a friend to take our racing bikes on a flying trip. It can be a hassle to get these bikes in an C172 (even without the wheels). Therefore I thought about the removal of the seats. Before asking my local flying club, I just wanted to know whether it's legal or not. The seat is removed in minutes I suppose, but was not sure about the legal part.

Thanks for the discussion so far.
jkveenstra is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 16:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think this says it all:

Don't see why not.

Never thought about the W&B issue
Gomrath is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 18:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This puzzles me

The W & B figures and Graphs in the manual are worked out from the actual weight of the aircraft and the C of G datum point.

While I appreciate what others are saying in the fact that the datum point will only move a little it still has moved making the data in the manual null and void.
It maybe pedantic but then many things are in aviation which makes something which was legal illegal.

I have had no experience in removing seats and the technical ramifications of doing so but would imagine SOMEONE would have to approve such an action not just a pilot with a monkey wrench removing bits and pieces at will?

I appreciate in real terms it will make very little difference but in legal terms you are not operating to the certification data of the aircraft.

Pace

Last edited by Pace; 28th Mar 2013 at 18:20.
Pace is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 18:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Used be a normal procedure in Oz. You were expected to calculate the adjusted EW/CG and use the new figures. That sort of stuff is included in the CPL theory exams (or used to be).
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 19:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Commercially we just get a config change W&B report.

They don't re-weigh the plane just do the calcs and issue the report.

Then the W&B stays with the tech log and pilots can do the re-role with engineering QA approval. And entry is put in the techlog when ever the configuration is changed.

I can't see its a huge deal to be honest after the first time you do it.
mad_jock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.