Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Help me decide what aircraft to buy.

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Help me decide what aircraft to buy.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Mar 2013, 14:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
I would agree with the point about importing an aircraft from the US.

However, if an aircraft has a current permit from the LAA then it should be up to scratch, one would hope.
Jonty is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 14:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If i often visit my relatives in Sweden about 200 nm away. In a PA28 thats 5520 NOK. (calculating rougly 4 hours) there and back.
That's not much of a job for a Long Eze - I met a guy who flew one from Hawaii to California So again, with an O-235 sipping auto fuel like a C152, cruising at something not too far below your goal, it's an aircraft that was designed to do what you're wanting to do.... if you have hard runways. About $40K for a nice one.
Silvaire1 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 14:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
The problem with non certified aircraft in Europe is the weather. Certainly in the UK they are limited to day VFR only. Makes them somewhat restrictive.
Jonty is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 15:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Somerset, UK
Age: 75
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you have to factor a lot more than fuel cost.
Hangarage
Insurance
Servicing
Annuals
.. plus incidentals on top. Tyres, oil, repairs etc. etc

These added together will almost certainly exceed your fuel cost per hour unless you fly at least 100+ hours per year

Last edited by Choxolate; 21st Mar 2013 at 15:07.
Choxolate is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 16:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, coming to think of it, there actually is an airplane that pretty much fits your bill: Marchetti 260. They are pretty rare (in the civilian version), but go like hell and are fully aerobatic. Not sure about the economics, though.
172driver is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 18:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Economics........Marchetti........same thread...........me going to lay down in a dark room ,
A and C is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 19:12
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norway
Age: 37
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"you have to factor a lot more than fuel cost.
Hangarage
Insurance
Servicing
Annuals
.. plus incidentals on top. Tyres, oil, repairs etc. etc"


- Are you implying that these costs would be higher than for a PA28?
rpetersson is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 21:47
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jonty

While you opinion that an aircraft with a current LAA permit would be OK is well founded some do slip through the net.

It was the wing tip strobe electrical cables routed through a length of (leaking) garden hose in the wing tip fuel tank that got my attention on one USA import.

Last edited by A and C; 21st Mar 2013 at 21:49.
A and C is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 04:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Piss poor standard. How hard can it be to find a length of non-leaking garden hose?
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 13:33
  #30 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Norway you'd want an IR and deice how about an older Seneca, what with all that terrain around? Probably cheaper than owning a car in Norway !
englishal is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 00:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: london, UK
Age: 57
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
get a nice RV-4 with a 160 or a 180 on the front. That's fast enough.
tommoutrie is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 09:53
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SAYE
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pipistrel Virus or Sinus is my choice. Fast, very efficient, ideal for cross-country flying. In 2012 a Pipistrel Virus completed a long westbound flight around the world (from/to Slovenia via Senegal, Antarctica, Easter Island, New Zealand, Mt. Everest, Seychelles, etc.). Average fuel burn was 4.78 gph in 369 hours flown. The total distance was 49,138 nm, 17,873 of which were above water. The average ground speed was a little over 133 knots with an average headwind of 12 knots. The highest recorded GS was 190 knots and the highest recorded altitude was 29,413 feet near Mt. Everest. (sources: Flying Magazine, Full Itinerary, GreenLight WorldFlight | North Pole - Why)

Last edited by avionimc; 25th Mar 2013 at 09:59.
avionimc is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 17:27
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would someone who specified an aircraft capable of 180-200kts be interested in a Pipistrel Virus? Seriously, do take the time to read the original question...
wsmempson is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2013, 18:41
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: south coast
Posts: 417
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could have a look at a Harmon Rocket ?
Barcli is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 09:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Harmon Rocket seems on the face of things to be an attractive idea but the rear cockpit is very cramped and more important the RV4 it is derived from can have issues with the firewall structure, given the extra weight of the O-540 this is likely to be an issue even with the extra structure to support the bigger engine.

On the whole I think it is just a bit too much power and likely to upset the balance of the very nice RV4.

Last edited by A and C; 26th Mar 2013 at 10:18.
A and C is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2013, 11:49
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 771
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
You could buy my Arrow 2 instead, which is currently "priced to sell". Admittedly, it's not quite as fast as your spec (and not 6g) but with the price difference you could operate two aircraft - one for travel and one for aeros.

HFD
hugh flung_dung is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.