Is this legal?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kent
Age: 47
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this legal?
Hi
Thinking of converting onto flexwing microlights for some summer fun and I stumbled across this video on youtube. This looks great fun and I would love to do this kind of thing but is it legal? Im pretty sure the 500' rule would come into play here with a light aircraft but are microlights exempt?
It does look like fantastic fun though.
Thinking of converting onto flexwing microlights for some summer fun and I stumbled across this video on youtube. This looks great fun and I would love to do this kind of thing but is it legal? Im pretty sure the 500' rule would come into play here with a light aircraft but are microlights exempt?
It does look like fantastic fun though.
Last edited by Prophead; 6th Jan 2013 at 11:30.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They arn't exempt from the 500ft rule.
Its not showing to me any video. working now. Thats legal for just now. Come the new EASA rule changes with a hard limit of 500ft agl that will change.
The irish did a promo for going over there while the olympics were on. They had some cracking shot of wazzing around the countryside at sub 500ft buzzing roads etc.
Its not showing to me any video. working now. Thats legal for just now. Come the new EASA rule changes with a hard limit of 500ft agl that will change.
The irish did a promo for going over there while the olympics were on. They had some cracking shot of wazzing around the countryside at sub 500ft buzzing roads etc.
Last edited by mad_jock; 6th Jan 2013 at 11:38.
PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apart from the shot flying over the (apparently) uninhabited and beached boat, I didn't see the pilot getting close to any person, vessel, or structure.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 500' rule certainly applies to microlights, and up until recently they weren't allowed to fly over built up areas at all, even if they could glide clear. I believe this has changed and the same rules apply as for light aircraft, but some microlights may still have the restriction?
Apart from the bits at the beginning where there is a small village, it seems to mostly be over a deserted beach, there is maybe one person on the beach so he is probably breaking the law at times in this video, but largely not.
However, microlights aren't the quietest thing ever, I know they are quieter than a typical light aircraft, but it's a higher pitch tone which can be quite a nuisance to the locals. I hope he didn't annoy anyone with this type of flying, as it gives us all a bad name, I try to be as considerate as possible with my low flying. Looks like he chose a very deserted area though, so I'm sure there won't have been any complaints.
Apart from the bits at the beginning where there is a small village, it seems to mostly be over a deserted beach, there is maybe one person on the beach so he is probably breaking the law at times in this video, but largely not.
However, microlights aren't the quietest thing ever, I know they are quieter than a typical light aircraft, but it's a higher pitch tone which can be quite a nuisance to the locals. I hope he didn't annoy anyone with this type of flying, as it gives us all a bad name, I try to be as considerate as possible with my low flying. Looks like he chose a very deserted area though, so I'm sure there won't have been any complaints.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's deffo a vessel there, which is overflown at a few feet. So not legal. But not in any way dangerous either, and apart from the noise (which would not be affected by the 500' rule) not a problem for others in the vicinity.
I think one would have to expect there to be folk in the valley that he first flew down...or to pop up unexpectedly...asking for trouble,
Flying along a deserted beech should not be a problem as people ect should be able to be seen,
I fly a flex wing and am very aware of the legality's involved with low flight having done a fair bit myself...always along deserted coastlines.
Not a good advert IMHO.
Flying along a deserted beech should not be a problem as people ect should be able to be seen,
I fly a flex wing and am very aware of the legality's involved with low flight having done a fair bit myself...always along deserted coastlines.
Not a good advert IMHO.
Last edited by magpienja; 6th Jan 2013 at 20:54.
The irish did a promo for going over there while the olympics were on. They had some cracking shot of wazzing around the countryside at sub 500ft buzzing roads etc.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Flying along a deserted beech should not be a problem
(Warning: if you're thinking of trying this, the sand gets everywhere.)
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When Part-SERA comes into effect.
see 4.6 in http://www.easa.europa.eu/rulemaking...ing%20Rule.pdf
Its mentioned in that pdf a few times
see 4.6 in http://www.easa.europa.eu/rulemaking...ing%20Rule.pdf
Its mentioned in that pdf a few times
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The irish did a promo for going over there while the olympics were on. They had some cracking shot of wazzing around the countryside at sub 500ft buzzing roads etc.
From memory that video mentioned was low but I don't think it was below 500ft.
I'm not sure either if it was an official video?
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Central London
Age: 41
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The first bit over the village is very dodgy given how low he is. Fun as it looks, even if most of it is technically legal, it's just going to give private flying a bad name. There are enough NIMBYs out there already. Why create new ones by pulling stunts like this, and then posting them on YouTube for all and sundry to see!?
Last edited by taxistaxing; 6th Jan 2013 at 22:58.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last I heard, people were trying to get the CAA to plan to give blanket authorisation for PFLs / EFATO and a few other things (like picking up banners, practice approaches) but I haven't heard anything.
However I doubt anyone would go after you for it until something nasty happened or your video of yourself on YouTube skimming the water become popular...