Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Landing fees

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Dec 2012, 12:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hereford
Age: 83
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Landing fees

I visited Blackbushe airfield again for a short visit to meet friends. The cafe is pleasant and so are the staff as are fireman and ATC, but the charges are not.
The landing fees are now £25.46 unless you upload at least 25L fuel @£2.12. Hardly a saving.
I assume since they now have 2 or 3 exec jets based there, the management considered they are big time and GA is a nuisance.
There is not ILS or maintenance on site and the number of light aircraft has dimished significantly, I understand due to the extremely high fees for parking and landing.
Blackbushe is no longer economical to visit unless you're an MP on expenses.
Bushebiggles is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 12:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not a million miles from EGTF
Age: 68
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was planning to go there to visit relatives, but baulked at the cost.

£10-20 is ok for my little toy, but not that.
robin is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 13:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe there was comment somewhere recently about this. I think at that time there was more than one price for landing depending on time and whether you had PPR.

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 15:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is also now mandatory handling for aircraft over 2.5 tonnes (IIRC, could have been 3), which you don't seem to receive any additional service for I took the E90 in there in October and the total landing + handling bill came to around £130 inc VAT, compare that to Fairoaks which is much more conveniently placed for London and which charges half that and no unnecessary mandatory handling!
Oxeagle is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 15:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another 'Black' airfield is Blackpool, who charge in the twenty region. They do have a landing voucher in 'Flyer' magazine, but the tight bas**rds want you to upload 50litres, which most likely will cost you even more of a premium.... Free voucher I think not.

Andrewsfield (Grass), Tibenham and Turweston are in 'Pilot'.
Haverfordwest, Holmbeck (Grass), Retford Gamston, and Wick are in 'Flyer'.
Sleap is in both 'Flyer' and 'Pilot' for this December.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 16:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: 15 DME
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From memory, we paid iro £25.00 at Blackbushe for the Cirrus in the August.

You are right though, no maintainance facilities whatsoever.

Last edited by Richard Westnot; 9th Dec 2012 at 16:37.
Richard Westnot is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 21:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: south Wales
Age: 60
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure we have all seen these type of posts many times over the years and it seems to me that the only way we can get the message across to those airports that charge a over the top landing fee is "To not go there"!! , just boycott these places full stop ,, it seems to me some of these airport managers think they are doing us a favour letting us land there and there is also a degree of "can pay so will pay "in their thinking too , a chap I know use to take his citation into a certain airfield , charged him £100.00 , next time he went there it was £200.00 , so exit one customer. when they see the revenue from landing fees , fuel sales and the business like cafes fall then they will start to get the meassage and thats the only way they will get the message. direct action .
first taff is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2012, 22:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Taff. Places to avoid...

Shoreham charged me £21ish to land my Jodel last year, more than it cost to fly there. I haven't been back since. If there was one airfield that thinks it's Heathrow, this has got to be it (Apart from Heathrow of course) ATC are totally overbearing too..

Places I do go are Headcorn, North Weald, Turweston, Conington all have landing fees of £10. Pleasant, get a cup of tea and some lunch.. No frills..
'Chuffer' Dandridge is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 01:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Do the above quotes include parking? At Fairoaks, you only get charged for parking if you nightstop ie land just after 8am and depart just before 6pm and parking is free.
chevvron is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 02:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What to me is amazing, is that the business/commercial traffic isn't backing GA up on this at all and never have. Surely a 5 year old without even the slightest MBA in economics realises that if they accept higher GA fee's to keep the "riffraff" out, then that that's detrimental to all aviation business. Now they have to bear that cost alone. I've never understood the divide between GA and commercial in this regard. There is no joint organisation that looks after aviation as a whole, just a lot of special interest entities. By charging GA higher prices to keep the small stuff out, they all lose - don't they realise this?

If the very people these small airports with "shiny jet" hubris are trying to attract would also put their foot down, then there would be no overcharging taking place.

Last edited by AdamFrisch; 10th Dec 2012 at 03:20.
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 07:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Westnot
You are right though, no maintainance facilities whatsoever
Not true. There is an excellent gentleman who operates there with an alfresco peripatetic facility. It's not his fault that there are no hangars.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 07:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My experience of Blackbushe is one of a rude officious man on the radio and spectacular landing and parking fees. I'll only be going there for emergency diversions in future.
The front desk staff and local instructors were charming and you have to feel for them, having their livelihood eroded because the management want to price them out of the market.
FleetFlyer is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 16:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: south Wales
Age: 60
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99.9% of the comercial and business side of aviation could not give a toss about GA ,they dio it for a living we do it for fun were at the bottom of the food chain as far as there concerned and they would rather we were not around ,BUT , the last time i checked our money was as good as theirs,!! I know there are people like AOPA fighting our corner but to me we need to get more direct , puting the word around the ga comunity of the overcharging / bad service etc airfields, I mean they go to town on bad service companies on programes like watchdog etc , If I gave a bad service / too expensive for my work word would soon go around !! , why should aviation be any different , perhaps we should start a union ?? LOL

Last edited by first taff; 10th Dec 2012 at 16:51.
first taff is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 18:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 11 GROUP
Age: 77
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 27 Posts
Landing Fees !!!

Simple answer to this. Most airfields are run by private individuals or a Company.
They are under no obligation to offer any service to anyone,and are free to 'open their stall for custom' as they please.
You the customer makes the choice whether to make use of a facility or not.
This may depend on what your particular requirement is,and that may influence what you are prepared to pay.
An Airfield that at least offers a fuel uplift to offset a fee seems to be making an effort to 'get your custom'.
If you choose not to avail yourself of this that is your decision based upon how important your need is.
Of course you could operate your own airfield and provide a service to suit.
POBJOY is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 19:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Pobjoy, you may not have done the maths, if you think its a 'discount' if you buy fuel....

Blackpool require 50 litres of fuel uptake at £2.21, instead of £1.72 back at my base airfield. A difference of 49p/litre, or an excess charge of £24.50.

Is that worth it? Even if you do get your knick-knacks sent through a scanner prior to departure...
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 22:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 11 GROUP
Age: 77
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 27 Posts
Do the maths

You miss the point Phiggs,no one is forcing you to land at BP or anywhere else,you have a choice, and it seems a very low avgas price at base.
That is your good fortune,but not relevant to landing somewhere else.
A customer has the best option to avoid what he considers to be high charges; do not go there.
POBJOY is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2012, 22:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
I agree that ultimately privately owned airfields generally have the right to charge whatever they choose. On the other hand, it is irksome when the charges are quite so high. If you plan to go somewhere, as oppose to just fly to get a burger for fun, then you don't always have the discretion to fly to a different airfield.

I flew from Blackbushe for a little while, including during weekdays, and there was very little conflict between bizjets / commercial traffic and the flying school aircraft, at least as far as I could tell. Likewise at Inverness, where it was generally straightforward to stay out of the way whilst the bigger aircraft came in and out.

There does seem to be a trend that even smaller airports are becoming prohibitively expensive, and from the outside I agree that it's hard to imagine that anyone will be profiting from this.
abgd is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2012, 00:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: THE NORTH
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blackpool

Prices December

Fuel is £2.04 a litre inc. Vat.

Normal landing fee up to 3 tonnes is £8.20 per half tonne plus Vat. (50% disc. For training)
JUST-local is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2012, 07:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 11 GROUP
Age: 77
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 27 Posts
Blackpool Charges

Have looked up what Blackpool has on offer for its £8.20 per HT + Vat charges.

Two runways,Radar.Instument approach,lights,Walk to Town,multiple facilities, Etc Etc.

By any standards that seems a good deal,unlike Plymouth which is now CLOSED, and will be developed.

If you choose to be involved with aviation; be pleased that there are Airfields available when you need them.
POBJOY is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2012, 08:18
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
'rude officious man on the radio' at Blackbushe? Well talkdownman doesn't work there any more, so I wonder who it could be?
chevvron is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.