Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Help needed from an experienced pilot...

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Help needed from an experienced pilot...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th October 2012 | 23:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Help needed from an experienced pilot...

Hey guys,

I am currently studying towards a PPL and would really appreciate advice from any experienced flyers out there. With regard to the minimum height rule (flying IFR) I understand that an aircraft must fly at least 1000ft above the highest fixed obstacle within 5nm. However, there are, of course, exceptions. One of which is: on a route notified for this rule. Can anyone explain what this means exactly?
Jscot89 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 09:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
What it says. Somewhere in the AIP it'll say "this route is notified for the purpose of rule xxx".
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 13:03
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
er . . . if you are studying towards a PPL, seems to me flying IFR and the rules thereof are not your first priority.

Start with VFR rules. minimum height is 500ft rule, over towns 1,000ft. Then the weather rules (visibility and distance clear of cloud) for the respective class of airspace.

hope this helps, flyme.
flyme273 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 14:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: UK
IFR basics (including the minimum height rule) are covered in the UK PPL air law syllabus, so trainee PPLs need to know and understand the sort of question asked in the OP. So it's a little unwise telling the OP that it's not a priority.
wb9999 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 15:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
I wonder if the IFR questions will be dropped from the PPL exams now that a new PPL cannot fly IFR without further ratings.

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 16:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 2
From: UK
What it says. Somewhere in the AIP it'll say "this route is notified for the purpose of rule xxx".
I've never found a route notified for the purposes of Rule 33, have you?
bookworm is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 23:36
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Thanks guys, much appreciated
Jscot89 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2012 | 10:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: Oxford
If they notify a route under rule 33, then someone has an engine failure and ploughs into houses, who will get the blame?

I wonder if that's why there don't seem to be any...

Tim
tmmorris is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.