Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

C182 NXT - Diesel goes mainstream

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

C182 NXT - Diesel goes mainstream

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 17:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
C182 NXT - Diesel goes mainstream

At last, the airplane I have been waiting for! C182 direct from Cessna with the newest SMA engine. 1160nm range on 87 USG.

http://textron.vo.llnwd.net/o25/CES/...kylane_NXT.pdf
Katamarino is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 18:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's over 6 hours endurance. Does it have a toilet?
DeltaV is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 18:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,204
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
What is the price difference between the Diesel and Avgas engine versions ?
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 19:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something wrong there. Doesn't sound that much better than the new generation avgas burner.

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 19:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FMMI
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finally another diesel, not being a Diamond. But what is with that 18000 ft limitation on all those diesels? Does anybody know?
Immortal is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 20:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Immortal
But what is with that 18000 ft limitation on all those diesels? Does anybody know?
Turbodiesel need much higher pressures to reach full rated power than classic Lycontinentals. For example, the MAP on Centurion 2.0 with full takeoff power is around 2.3 - 2.4 bar (~ 70"), while on Continental TSIO-360 the MAP is 40". As the altitude increases, the pressure drops and you can't sustain 70" for long, even in twin-turbo installations. Again, the critical altitude of Centurion 2.0 is around 6000ft (to achieve 100% load), while the TSIO-360 has it in the range of 12-13 thousand feet.

To simplify: you can get 200HP from an average normal aspirated Lycosaur, but you won't get it from a normal aspirated Diesel engine, unless you can swallow a substantial increase in size and weight. This is why virutally all cars use turbodiesel engines, not normal aspirated ones.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 20:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FMMI
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I look at this article on the DA42 UAV, the ceiling is 30000 ft, but the engines seem the same.

DA42-Based UAV Tested

Also the Grey Eagle drone has a reported ceiling of 29.000 feet and uses a Centurion engine.

February 2012 Military Power - Diesel Power Magazine

I've been talking to a DA42 pilot and he reports a climb performance at FL170 of about 900 feet a minute, that does not indicate a big loss of power at altitude.

Last edited by Immortal; 23rd Jul 2012 at 20:27.
Immortal is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2012, 22:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,204
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Price just announced $ 515,000
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 04:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well yes, with 500 kg less MTOM it's not surprising that the engines are capable of delivering enough power to climb to FL300.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 07:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting thing is that it will replace the Avgas version, not being offered alongside it.
172driver is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 07:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't believe that "replace" part of the statement is correct. According to the 2011 GAMA report, Cessna sold 40 normally aspirated and 37 turbo 182. That is not much and stopping the gasoline model wouldn't cause much harm. However, it also wouldn't cost much just continuing to offer this model.
achimha is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 10:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Glens o' Angus by way of LA
Age: 60
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a recurring dream that I arrive at the strip to fly my 0-360 equipped Maule to discover that someone has magically installed a 200HP single control diesel engine (that runs on agri diesel) and a BRS system in it, I usually wake up right before the part where I notice that Jennifer Anniston is sitting right seat asking where we are going today !
piperboy84 is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 10:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
before the part where I notice that Jennifer Anniston is sitting right seat asking where we are going today !
To which you of course reply 'to go shopping for aircraft diesel engines'

achima, both AOPA and FLYING Mag report the same, i.e. 'replace'. Surprised me also, and of course both may be wrong, but give the sales figures I'm not sure it makes sense (from Cessna's POV) to produce both. We'll see.

Does anyone know if these engines can be retrofitted into existing (old) 182 airframes?

In any case this comes close to being the ideal combination for long trips to interesting places
172driver is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 11:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They say it is only the turbo avgas burner they are stopping.

$72000 is the price premium for the diesel version.

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 11:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FMMI
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if these engines can be retrofitted into existing (old) 182 airframes?
Yes that is possible, the engine itself is already certified. Dry weight: 207 kg.

SMA Jet Fuel Piston Engines - Mastenbroek Aeroskill

Cost? I am not sure, but I heard something about €60.000 for the engine itself.
Immortal is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2012, 15:01
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and it's still a worse offering than the Pipistrel Pantera (granted that one isn't certified yet but).
Shorrick Mk2 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 07:47
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FMMI
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My guess is that the Panthera will be one of the last HPA with a AVGAS burner up front. Continental just announced 3 diesel engines:

Continental Motors unveils plans for trio of diesels
Immortal is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 08:10
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and it's still a worse offering than the Pipistrel Pantera (granted that one isn't certified yet but).
Nor has it even flown yet...
Hodja is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 11:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt the diesel Cessna would make sense on a purely financial basis in the UK.

Assuming it used half the fuel of the avgas model and the fuel costs half as much. The saving over 2000 hours at UK prices is £34000 against a price premium of £48000.

Presumably by then a more expensive overhaul is due? Have I missed something?

D.O.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 11:11
  #20 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,614
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Altitude limitations for the aircraft may be based not upon the ability of the diesel engine to operate well at high altitude, but to be restarted up there. This was the basis for the altitude limitation on an earlier diesel aircraft.

The opportunity to retrofit an SMA diesel in an older 182, though theoretically there, is practically not. I ordered an SMA engine, on behalf of a client, in March 2010, and the aircraft has been waiting firewall bare since then. The older SMA diesel, though STC'd in the 182, is no longer available. 47 were converted. The new SMA "E" engine is not STC'd for retrofit - the future will tell. I have met with the SMA President with respect to the purchase of an SMA engine on more than one occasion. SMA staff were very welcoming, and attempted to fulfill this order. Though things did not go the way I would have hoped, I do understand SMA's priorities with respect to the "aftermarket" use of their engines.

Cessna's SMA diesel 182 will be a remarkable aircraft.....
Pilot DAR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.