Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Hobbs v Tacho

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th June 2012 | 16:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Castleford
Hobbs v Tacho

Good evening Ppruners,
Another bit of advice needed please. Our group agreements are all coming together nicely, but we seem to have hit a snag on whether we should bill the flying time on the Hobbs meter or Tacho, could someone please explain the pros and cons to me as I haven't got a clue!

Thanks in advance, Jim
Lagentium is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2012 | 16:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Hobbs = time the aircraft is in a certain state, normally the time that the oil pressure is above a certain psi.
Tacho is a count of the number of revolutions of an engine which has been converted into a time based on the engine being at a specific (normally cruise?) RPM.

If you bill based on tacho, people are more likely to use a more gentle cruise speed and pilots are not going to hurry taxiing (as the rpm is lower and so you pay less). Of course - it will also depend on whether your bills include fuel (but I'm sure thats on a different thread).

In my share we bill on airborne time plus 5 min. This means there is no incentive to rush power checks, etc although it does mean that student pilots doing efficient (ie relatively slow and well leaned) cross country cruising probably slightly subsidise those doing aerobatics...
It also matches engine maintenance schedules as they are based on actual time rather than hobbs / tacho.
That and we trust each other to record the details accurately!
riverrock83 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2012 | 17:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
It doesn't really matter. Just add up all the costs you made in a certain period, except for the costs that can be allocated to a single flight (e.g. landing fees). Divide by the total tacho or hobbs time accumulated in that period. Then for each flight multiply that amount by the amount of tacho or hobbs that that flight generated.

You will find that the numbers will be very, very close together. The difference will mostly be because of rounding.

The only time where you will see a significance difference is where the members of your group have wildly different usage patterns. Like when one member does all-out aerobatics, and the other uses the aircraft as an aerial observation platform at minimum sustainable RPM.

Last edited by BackPacker; 25th June 2012 at 17:11.
BackPacker is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2012 | 20:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
If you totally trust the group members, bill by airborne time.
peterh337 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2012 | 21:00
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 16
From: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Bill by tacho. As a group, it'll even out over time. Logging time in air is a nuisance - I'm sometimes busy with other things (like controlling a taildragger in a gusty wind) immediately before take-off and after touchdown.
Even if you trust each other at present, using tach means nobody starts to suspect anyone.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.