Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Cockpit cameras?

Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Cockpit cameras?

Old 31st May 2012, 01:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cockpit cameras?

Hello,

I am making a return to flying next week after a (hugely) long break. I made the decision to film every last second I spend in the air from now, and am therefore looking for a decent video camera to use in the cockpit.

I have been unable to find any useful reviews of these things, I'm guessing this is because the market for them is so small to begin with. As a result, I thought I'd ask here for any feedback other members may have.

I'm looking for something designed to deal with the motion of propellers (ie, something with a lens/filter that makes propeller spin look naturally blurred). Also with the capability to record at least 720p video and can be hooked up to the aircraft's intercom.

I'd greatly appreciate any advice you may have!

Thanks

Odai.
Odai is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 02:54
  #2 (permalink)  
Hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian title
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: is everything
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need to avoid devices with rolling shutters. In practice, that means using something with a CMOS sensor rather than a CCD (and then testing before purchase). For the actual device, if small size is important you could check out sites that review helmet/handlebar cams and similar devices. Otherwise, there's a huge range of very small videocameras on the market now.

Edit for clarification: almost all, or maybe all, CCD devices use a rolling shutter. The majority of consumer-level CMOS devices also use a rolling shutter, but a large minority don't. You need to pick something from the "large minority" category.

Edit for correctness: as pointed out by Mark1234 further down, I'm generally correct apart from being exactly wrong . Swap all references to CCD and CMOS. Put it down to brainfarts.

Last edited by Bushfiva; 31st May 2012 at 10:46.
Bushfiva is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 04:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Just South of the last ice sheet
Posts: 2,678
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
I've just bought a Dogcam (yes really) which is an 80mm long, 22mm diameter tube with a 135 degree wide angle lens. It'll record at 30 fps and 720i for 1.5 to 2 hours. It has an array of different brackets and mountings available. I just got it out of the box today and will be trying it out in my mate's boat and on the car until I can get flying the weekend after next. I'll let you know how it goes.
LowNSlow is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 06:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the last five years I have been using a Sony Digital Camcorder, sometimes on a tripod held down in the rear seats with seat belts and bungee cords, sometimes sitting on the dash/held by pax. This is a 6 year old, "legacy tape" type of unit rather than recording to a memory stick. That means it takes longer to convert the films on the PC when I get home, and battery & tape life is only 90 mins, max.

The picture quality is superb. The propeller is almost invisible, sometimes showing up as a grey disk rather than the series of bent lines you get with solid state devices.

I have the camera connected to the intercom via a splitter lead and this is one of the deciding factors that you need to bear in mind as well as the lens type.

You MUST get a camera with an external microphone input. Throttling your intercom output is essential and provides hours of "fun" trying to get it right.


If I was was starting again, I'd probably buy the nflitecam.
airpolice is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 06:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got a GoPro Hero 2 a few weeks ago. Very impressive bit of kit. Made a really nice aeros video with it. The motorsports edition comes with decent suction cup that stays on at +4 to -1 G. So far I have only used it inside the cockpit, but one day I might just go for the outside view...

There are ways to minimize the effect from rolling shutter but frankly it's just as easy to simply ignore it.

If you want to record intercom sound you need to buy an alternative case from GoPro that gives you access to the Mic In port. Or cut a hole in the default (waterproof) case.

Anyway, there's an article about this very subject in this months Flyer magazine.

Edited to add: This may be the solution to both problems: PILOTS! Stop GoPro Hero Propeller Artifacting | The Pilot Report

Last edited by BackPacker; 31st May 2012 at 07:04.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 07:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,822
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Just got a Replay XD 1080 and have had tried it mounted in various positions and the results are very promising. The field of view is close to that of the eye, so it gives a "first person" sort of feel to the footage. Great for capturing skyscapes.
FullWings is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 07:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 32°55'22"S 151°46'56"E
Age: 39
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cheap option for amateurs

I really struggled to find a cheap camera with 3.5mm microphone input, but eventually got the Kodak Zi8 with a PA80 adapter to record the audio.

Pilot Avionics PA 80 Video/Audio Adapter Cable (GA Twin Plug)

The Kodak Zi8 has been replaced with the Zi12 which also has the 3.5mm mic input.

All in all, if you wanted a cheaper option, I think this is the way to do it. The Zi8 and Zi12 both have the standard mounting threads so you can buy a mounting kit for it if you wanted.
I've taken some good videos, and with the audio input, it means ínstead of endless noise you can at least you can record the conversations onboard.

All in all, I think this setup cost me about 160 pounds.
L'aviateur is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 07:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: N Ireland
Age: 55
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a cheap and (fairly) cheerful solution I use a Creative Vado HD mini-camcorder on a suction cup mount. It's a 720p camera with external audio input. On the advice of others here and elsewhere I use a Maplin telephone pickup coil to record audio. It can be stuck on the inside or outside of a headset (works better inside) and there's no messing about with levels as the auto record level in the camera takes care of it. Also there's no intrusion into the radio/headset connections. One thing I would say is that the audio is very clean and if you want to hear some background noise (engine etc) you won't get much of that. The solution is to have a second camera with a built in mic and do a bit of editing later.
This camera is however subject to a bit of vibration when mounted on the side window of the C172, I might see if I can get some sort of anti-vibration mount for it.

Other cameras that I use are a Canon SX1 which is capable of 1080p video and has a built in stereo mic, and a couple of these which for £25 delivered from an ebay seller in Hong Kong are very good.

I normally do a little basic editing on the raw video as lengthy flying videos can be really boring

Last edited by madgav; 31st May 2012 at 15:31.
madgav is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 07:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The frozen north....
Age: 49
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I started off with an ATC5K a few ago which worked well but the resloution wasnt brilliant and the FOV was pretty limited:-

ATC5K Helmet Action Camera by Oregon Scientific

I then moved to a VIO POV 1.5 with an 8gb SD card which I have mounted to my headset:-

VIO POV 1.5 Camera System - PointofViewCameras.co.uk

For me the main advantage of these cams is that they have an LCD screen so you can see exactly where they are pointing, its very frustrating to do a flight then come back and review the footage to find the camera wasnt quite set up right and its at a funny angle or pointing mostly at the instrument panel.

There are now better options on the market and POV have a new HD cam which would be my choice if I was going to change:-

POV HD Digital Helmet Cameras :: V.I.O.

A pal of mine uses the latest GO-PRO strapped to his head when flying at work and that also produces some excellent footage however unfortunately I dont have enough room in the cockpit for something that bulky and am limited to bullet cams...

Regards

UA

Last edited by Unusual Attitude; 31st May 2012 at 07:53.
Unusual Attitude is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 08:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have recently acquired an NFlightcam Plus. This does the job nicely, recording audio from the intercom and tracking your position via an internal GPS. The propeller problem is virtually eliminated with the use of the filter supplied. The camera works in either 1080p or 720p. The only downside is the price.

This video was shot using the Nflightcam. The small picture in picture was recorded on a Jumbo 808 keyfob camera stuck on the coming with velcro. I used Adobe premier to edit it and splice in the PIP.
dobbin1 is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 10:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What bushfiva said, only the other way round!

CMOS devices generally suffer the 'rolling shutter'. The image is scanned line at a time off the chip, so motion between line scans gives you the strange prop effects and vibration skew etc. This can be mitigated with a dark filter over the lens / other means of slowing the shutter speed so these objects don't register. Not a perfect solution.

CCD sensors generally operate a global shutter. The chip construction allows provision of a set or secondary registers on chip - at the end of the exposure the imaging sensors are transferred to their secondaries en masse, then the secondaries are read. As such you don't get the skew etc.

That said, it seems nobody uses CCDs in their devices anymore..
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 10:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This topic has been done to death here many times

My little input this time is that IMHO one will soon get fed up with the distorted image produced by most cheap cameras. So try to get something that produces a proper rectangular frame. I used the Dogcam and it was basically crap. There is a video in this trip writeup.

The shutter/prop effects are also naff. All the little cameras suffer from them - LCD or CMOS are mostly marketing names for similar technology. It is caused by a very fast shutter speed; the cheap cams don't have an iris so use shutter speed as the only means of controlling the aperture. Consequently, sometimes, putting a neutral density filter on the front can alleviate the issue, by reducing the light coming in and forcing the camera to use a slower shutter speed. But a manual-shutter speed camera is the only decent solution.

Now I use a Canon Legria G10 which has a manual shutter and at 1/120 or slower (which is ~ 1/10 to 1/50 of the shutter speed of the cheapo cams) one can shoot straight through the prop and one just sees a slightly visible arc which is as it should be. But it wasn't exactly cheap. I also have a proper anti-vib mount for it with massive suction pads for mounting it on the windscreen.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 10:44
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: QLD
Age: 35
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recently bought a VIO POV HD and am quite happy with it! Has a couple of useful mounts, a wide angle, up to 1080p and is quite handy! Battery life is 3-4hrs which is probably not bad for a flight cam but still a bit annoying for me..,

Rolling shutter effect:

The solution to this is a neutral density filter! It forces the shutter to slow down which blurs the prop and makes it look like it should!
I'm using a 1.8 ND filter fixed to the lens which almost completely eliminates the shutter effect. I guess if I find a 2.0 one day it will be perfect...

see here:


Cheers
maehhh
maehhh is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 13:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are content with the massive spherical abberation in the one above, then almost any "HD" USB webcam will do just fine.

Ages ago, I actually did get a pretty fair result from a Micro$oft £50 webcam. No real distortion, too, and better than the £140 Dogcam whose main claim to fame is that you can mount it outside the cockpit (it is weatherproof) which is OK if you do a decent job of it, and nobody sees it
peterh337 is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 14:27
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And fix the focus on infinity...please.
funfly is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 15:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: QLD
Age: 35
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are content with the massive spherical abberation in the one above, then almost any "HD" USB webcam will do just fine.
I actually quite like this fish-eye kind of look.... it is on purpose. If u turn it to 720p the angle decreases to 90degree and there is no more than ordinary aberration.
maehhh is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 15:32
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: N Ireland
Age: 55
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rolling shutter effect:

The solution to this is a neutral density filter!
Interesting, must try that.
Every day's a school day
madgav is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 21:16
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 747
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I rather like the look of the Drift range of cameras... and the wide angle lens rotatable....and it come with a remote control.
magpienja is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 02:04
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many thanks everyone for the great responses.

I did originally look at getting the Nflightcam, simply because it met my requirements while being designed for flying (making it easier to hook up to the intercom, built in GPS etc). However, I can't help but think it is hugely overpriced (~£480 I think).

I'm looking now at the GoPro HD2 range, and how to adapt that to flying. Just a few questions before I go any further:

- Is it possible to set this model up so as to avoid the 'fish-eye' effect? I understand the benefits of such lenses but I'd still really like to avoid it

- How can you determine the appropriate volume level on the aircraft intercom for recording? Is it simply trial and error?

- I'm guessing all I need to connect the camera to the intercom is a cable that allows the mic input to be connected in parallel to the headset/intercom audio output, there's no need for any kind of additional amplification or impedance right?

- Are there any ND filters for this camera? Is it possible to rig one up yourself?

Thanks again!

Odai.
Odai is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 05:01
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
- Is it possible to set this model up so as to avoid the 'fish-eye' effect? I understand the benefits of such lenses but I'd still really like to avoid it
Yes. Set it to 1080 instead of 1080w and you use a relatively medium-angle setting which avoids the fish-eye effect (by essentially only using the center portion of the picture). Field of view is then 127 degrees vs. 170 for wide-angle.

- How can you determine the appropriate volume level on the aircraft intercom for recording? Is it simply trial and error?

- I'm guessing all I need to connect the camera to the intercom is a cable that allows the mic input to be connected in parallel to the headset/intercom audio output, there's no need for any kind of additional amplification or impedance right?
I have not tried this yet, but if anything you will need a resistor or something in the circuit, instead of an amplifier. I would expect a lot of trial and error to be needed though.

EDITED: This looks like it will do just fine:
Video Recorder Audio Adapter - Fixed Wing - MyPilotStore.com

Just remember to get an enclosure that allows access to the mic port. You can get those from GoPro direct, but I suggest you look at the other link for the enclosure that includes the ND filter. One of those has an opening for the various connectors on the left hand side. See also below.

- Are there any ND filters for this camera? Is it possible to rig one up yourself?
See the link I posted for a guy who sells GoPro housings with ND filters built-in.

Last edited by BackPacker; 2nd Jun 2012 at 13:20.
BackPacker is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.