Bernoulli's Principle
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: High Wycombe
Bernoulli's Principle
Hi all,
A question that I am hoping you can all help me with please.
I am learning to fly and have been learning about Bernoulli’s principle.
The principle as I understand it is that the air travels faster over the top of the wing therefore creating a low pressure. This low pressure enables the air passing under the wing to effectively be pushing against a lower pressure area and therefore more effective thus helping lift.
My question is why does the air travel faster over the curved surface? I was told that it’s to get to the back of the wing at the same time as the air that goes underneath the wing but what is it that means it has to get to the back at the same time? Why does it have to travel faster? Why can it not travel at the same speed?
All opinions and advice gratefully received.
Regards.
A question that I am hoping you can all help me with please.
I am learning to fly and have been learning about Bernoulli’s principle.
The principle as I understand it is that the air travels faster over the top of the wing therefore creating a low pressure. This low pressure enables the air passing under the wing to effectively be pushing against a lower pressure area and therefore more effective thus helping lift.
My question is why does the air travel faster over the curved surface? I was told that it’s to get to the back of the wing at the same time as the air that goes underneath the wing but what is it that means it has to get to the back at the same time? Why does it have to travel faster? Why can it not travel at the same speed?
All opinions and advice gratefully received.
Regards.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: London
From Wikipedia:
Bernoulli's principle can also be derived directly from Newton's 2nd law. If a small volume of fluid is flowing horizontally from a region of high pressure to a region of low pressure, then there is more pressure behind than in front. This gives a net force on the volume, accelerating it along the streamline.[5][6]
Fluid particles are subject only to pressure and their own weight. If a fluid is flowing horizontally and along a section of a streamline, where the speed increases it can only be because the fluid on that section has moved from a region of higher pressure to a region of lower pressure; and if its speed decreases, it can only be because it has moved from a region of lower pressure to a region of higher pressure. Consequently, within a fluid flowing horizontally, the highest speed occurs where the pressure is lowest, and the lowest speed occurs where the pressure is highest.
Fluid particles are subject only to pressure and their own weight. If a fluid is flowing horizontally and along a section of a streamline, where the speed increases it can only be because the fluid on that section has moved from a region of higher pressure to a region of lower pressure; and if its speed decreases, it can only be because it has moved from a region of lower pressure to a region of higher pressure. Consequently, within a fluid flowing horizontally, the highest speed occurs where the pressure is lowest, and the lowest speed occurs where the pressure is highest.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: England
The top surface air reaches the trailing edge before the air underneath.
His experiments in the 1730s observed that water flowing through pipes of varying diameter was speeded up as it entered a segment of smaller diameter, i and its pressure decreased.
His experiments in the 1730s observed that water flowing through pipes of varying diameter was speeded up as it entered a segment of smaller diameter, i and its pressure decreased.
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: EGSX
I was told that it’s to get to the back of the wing at the same time as the air that goes underneath
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
Bernoulli seems to be falling out of favour anyway;-
The Airfoil Misconception in K-6 Textbooks
Airfoils and Airflow [Ch. 3 of See How It Flies]
The Airfoil Misconception in K-6 Textbooks
Airfoils and Airflow [Ch. 3 of See How It Flies]
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
It used to annoy me that some people just couldn't get lift theory, but if you told them it was lift fairys that kept the aircraft up they grasped it instantly.
You can actually do the whole of the PPL with lift fairy theory.
Critical angle of attack = angle which the lift fairys fall over so the aircraft stalls.
etc.
O well didn't make the slightest difference to them flying the aircraft they did get a brief though that on no account were they to tell anyone else about lift fairy theory.
You can actually do the whole of the PPL with lift fairy theory.
Critical angle of attack = angle which the lift fairys fall over so the aircraft stalls.
etc.
O well didn't make the slightest difference to them flying the aircraft they did get a brief though that on no account were they to tell anyone else about lift fairy theory.
Last edited by mad_jock; 21st May 2012 at 10:55.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
Bernoulli and Newton were both 17th century (or so) scientists and were trying to understand why stuff behaves like it does. And they did a good job progressing science. In fact, a lot of their principles have been used to teach science to people.
But after their deaths, science has moved on, and both have been proved wrong, either in generic cases or in corner cases.
As I understand it, the currently considered "good" explanation of air flow around a wing, and the resulting lift and drag, is based around an equilibrium equation involving five different factors (like pressure, temperature and speed) in some sort of integral. But that equation is very hard to visualize if you don't have an extremely good grasp of math, and is too hard to calculate by hand anyway. That's why we have computers and CFD.
So anything from the Lift Fairies, via the Equal Transit theory, to Newton (Impact Lift anyone?) to Bernoulli (high speed = low pressure) is essentially wrong to some degree. And is best used as an approximation of what happens only.
But after their deaths, science has moved on, and both have been proved wrong, either in generic cases or in corner cases.
As I understand it, the currently considered "good" explanation of air flow around a wing, and the resulting lift and drag, is based around an equilibrium equation involving five different factors (like pressure, temperature and speed) in some sort of integral. But that equation is very hard to visualize if you don't have an extremely good grasp of math, and is too hard to calculate by hand anyway. That's why we have computers and CFD.
So anything from the Lift Fairies, via the Equal Transit theory, to Newton (Impact Lift anyone?) to Bernoulli (high speed = low pressure) is essentially wrong to some degree. And is best used as an approximation of what happens only.
Last edited by BackPacker; 21st May 2012 at 12:33.
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
Its all to do with these equations.
Navier
They give engineering students nightmares until you discover that they just zero out the hard stuff.
And there still isn't a computer thats powerful enough to solve the whole lot.
They are pretty good at doing 2D linear models but as soon as its gets turbulent your into wag land. When your into 3D nonlinear and transient dynamic flows it produces some very pretty pictures and gives you an idea of what might happen but thats about it.
Navier
They give engineering students nightmares until you discover that they just zero out the hard stuff.
And there still isn't a computer thats powerful enough to solve the whole lot.
They are pretty good at doing 2D linear models but as soon as its gets turbulent your into wag land. When your into 3D nonlinear and transient dynamic flows it produces some very pretty pictures and gives you an idea of what might happen but thats about it.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: london
saycheese - one poster has already said the important thing, the explanation you seek refers to the equal transit theory which is not held in high regard because it leads to the very question you ask which is not answerable in those terms. (ie the overall explanation is really wrong/poor).
Google the coanda effect for more info. My understanding is that lift is caused by a combination of the air flowing over the upper surface sticking to it (coanda effect) and thus following the curve downward at the back (and thus being accelerated downward) and also the air striking the lower surface of the airfoil being accelerated downward by virtue of its shape.
The two accererations/deflections produce a reaction (newton) on the airfoil in an upward direction.
Stalls occur when the air on the top unsticks.
I expect someone who is better informed/has the correct instructors explanation can put some more detail to this...
Google the coanda effect for more info. My understanding is that lift is caused by a combination of the air flowing over the upper surface sticking to it (coanda effect) and thus following the curve downward at the back (and thus being accelerated downward) and also the air striking the lower surface of the airfoil being accelerated downward by virtue of its shape.
The two accererations/deflections produce a reaction (newton) on the airfoil in an upward direction.
Stalls occur when the air on the top unsticks.
I expect someone who is better informed/has the correct instructors explanation can put some more detail to this...
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Cape Town
Here is a link to a paper by Prof Babinsky who made the video I posted earlier.
http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9120/.../pe3_6_001.pdf
http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9120/.../pe3_6_001.pdf
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Chichester West Sussex UK
Say Cheese
I could not agree more.
As a pilot to be you should not concern yourself one jot with why a wing produces lift but become the world's greatest expert on what factors determine the lift of a wing and which of those are available to the pilot control the lift.
That is what will keep you alive - especially when turning onto finals.
I have never seen any real evidence that a detailed knowledge of Bernoulli is of real benefit to either a PPL or their instructor.
As a pilot to be you should not concern yourself one jot with why a wing produces lift but become the world's greatest expert on what factors determine the lift of a wing and which of those are available to the pilot control the lift.
That is what will keep you alive - especially when turning onto finals.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: England & Scotland
Yet the proof is simple, and you can "experiment" when sitting on the lavatory, if the equipment is to hand.
If there is awall-mounted loo-roll, and the end is hanging down, blow between the paper and the wall, parallel with the wall.
You are adding air and might expect the paper to move away from the wall. It doesn't; it moves towards the wall as the faster air stream lowers the air pressure on on side of the paper and the air pressure in the room acting on the other side of the paper pushes the paper towards the wall.
Flight training should be undertaken in the lavatory!
If there is awall-mounted loo-roll, and the end is hanging down, blow between the paper and the wall, parallel with the wall.
You are adding air and might expect the paper to move away from the wall. It doesn't; it moves towards the wall as the faster air stream lowers the air pressure on on side of the paper and the air pressure in the room acting on the other side of the paper pushes the paper towards the wall.
Flight training should be undertaken in the lavatory!
Last edited by John R81; 21st May 2012 at 12:32.