Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Stuck on IMC VOR question

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Stuck on IMC VOR question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th April 2012 | 12:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Pompey till I die
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Guildford
Stuck on IMC VOR question

21) Your VOR (shown below) is correctly tuned with the OBS set at 150, your desired track. If the variation is 4 degrees west, what is the true bearing from the VOR to your current position?



A 152
B 326
C 146
D 322
You chose B, but the correct answer was D.

I kept ending up with 324 degrees and worked through it several times but it still came back wrong. Where is my mistake?

1. I am wanting to go 150 to the VOR but I am to the right (needle is left so telling me to go left) which means I am 148
2. Because we want to be FROM the vor I add 180 = 328
3. Variation east, compass least. Variation west, compass best = 328M is 324T which is not correct

Last edited by PompeyPaul; 18th April 2012 at 14:47.
PompeyPaul is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 13:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Nobody flies true bearings

(sorry I can't help).
peterh337 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 13:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: .
I also got the same as you did Paul.

150 TO = 330 FROM. 1 dot deflection left = 2 degrees left, so 148 TO (328 FROM). Subtract Mag Variation to convert to True = 324 Deg T. Am I doing something daft?

Perhaps an instructor or Instrument Ace can enlighten thicko Smithy?
Captain Smithy is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 13:39
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Pompey till I die
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Guildford
Deflections

1 dot = 2Deg on VOR & 0.5Deg on ILS
PompeyPaul is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 13:41
  #5 (permalink)  
enq
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Essex, Innit
Does the answer lie in the image? - I recall seeing a VOR OBS question where the first "dot" was actually the outer radius of the centre circle so that the first actual dot represented 4 Deg off - if this is the case with your Q then your reasoning as applied becomes 150 - <4> +180 = 326M less 4 = 322T

Any help?
enq is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 13:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Back in the real world
I think I had exactly the same question in my exam recently and got it wrong as well.

Could the answer be that the picture is missing the first (inner) dot

I might add the same paper which asked a question about RIS and RAS
Nibbler is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 14:47
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Pompey till I die
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Guildford
Update

I've posted the picture now in the original question
PompeyPaul is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 14:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
That looks like a 4 degree deviation to me.

The little circle is 2 degrees.

Very confusing though.
peterh337 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 15:09
  #9 (permalink)  
enq
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Essex, Innit
Yep, that's the one wot I said.

Never accuse the CAA of failure to obfuscate.

Regards, enq.
enq is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 15:22
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Pompey till I die
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Guildford
Thanks!!

I still don't understand why it's 4 degree deviation though. Although that DOES make the answer work.
PompeyPaul is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 15:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
As Mad Jock would say this is what separates the real pilots from



Disclaimer: I would not have known how to work this out. Nobody flies with true bearings (in Europe).
peterh337 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 15:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
full deviation is 10 degrees - so in this case inner circle must represent 2 degs
neilr is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 15:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
This stuff should not be examined like that. It is appalling.

This



is fairly obvious. Obvious 2 degree divisions 0 2 4 6 8 10 degs.

But what about this



The first dot is "half scale" and if you reach that on an ILS you go around.
peterh337 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 15:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 1
From: On the wireless...
The circle represents +/- 2 degrees (total 4 degrees) course deviation. The left or right circumference of the circle represents 1 dot = 2 degrees.
In the diagram the QDM is displaced 4 degrees from the required track therefore the QDM is 146M.
The QDR is therefore 326M
Applying the Magnetic Variation of 4W the QTE is therefore 322T = Answer D.

Modern CDIs display simply 5 dots either side of centre.
At 2 degrees per dot the full scale deflection is at the 5th dot = 10 degrees.
Beyond that fifth dot Course Deviation is not measurable.
Talkdownman is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 16:08
  #15 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Disclaimer: I would not have known how to work this out. Nobody flies with true bearings (in Europe)
So did you not finally pass your JAA IR?

And without true track, how do you work out your quadrantal or semicircular rule altitude?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 16:32
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Pompey till I die
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Guildford
Strange

The left or right circumference of the circle represents 1 dot = 2 degrees.
In the diagram the QDM is displaced 4 degrees from the required track
Thanks, I'm obviously thick though. It looks like the needle is displaced by one dot to me, therefore it's 2 degrees off? I don't understand why it's 4 degrees off of track? Surely that should be 2 dots off?
PompeyPaul is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 16:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: UK, mainly
The circle encompasses 4 degrees of deviation - 2 left, 2 right. So the needle has deviated by the circle (2 degrees off-centre) and it's also hovering over a single dot (a further 2 degrees).
madlandrover is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 16:40
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Pompey till I die
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Guildford
AHHhhhh!!

Thanks, I get it! The inner circle is a dot itself, plus another dot as well. Damn, crafty bar stewards!
PompeyPaul is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 16:51
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by Genghis the Engineer
And without true track, how do you work out your quadrantal or semicircular rule altitude?
1) On magnetic track, as same as everybody else, since the quadrantal / semicircular rules are based on magnetic tracks

2) For en-route airways, you plan the directions the airways chart or Eurocontol allow. You fly what ATC clears you to. Only outside controlled airspace quadrantals are realy relevant.
Cobalt is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2012 | 16:59
  #20 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
Ooops, so we do.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.