Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Cessna Cardinal 177

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Cessna Cardinal 177

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2012, 17:11
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On Earth
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stabilator slots were added (and retrofitted for free) to counter a stong pitch down motion when side slipping with flaps down.
This allowed the stabilator to tolerate a steeper down flow of air without stalling the underside of the stabilator.
papa oscar is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 23:38
  #22 (permalink)  
XLC
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A friend of mine owns one in Thailand. He likes the plane but is at the same time aware of some of it's shortcomings - but then most planes have anyway. He mentioned to never buy a 'repaired' 177RG that had an accident for the fuselage can easily be out of alignment. On the positive side the fuel consumption is reasonable when flying long distances. And the look of course.
XLC is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 07:49
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I think the RG would be a little rich for my tastes, with potentially higher maintenance and less rugged gear for visiting back-country strips. A 180hp fixed gear would do nicely. Backpacker has kindly put me in touch with an owner nearby, so I hope to go for a flight in one soon!

Interesting about the fuselage alignment; I shall give greater preference to aircraft with NDH...
Katamarino is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 23:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I my experience there are several design faults built into O360 & IO360 engines. Very poor valve cooling, causing seized closed exhaust valves or high valve guide wear. Also need to carry out the wobble valve test every 400 hours or fit the latest hardened valve guides. Best to set up for very high oil pressure 80/100psi to push oil into the rocker covers to cool them.
The Mooney 235 actual has 4 oil lines to the rocker boxes with an oil jet on each exhaust valve stems to cool them, also all 360s have Sodium filled exhaust valves to try move the heat into the rocker box.

On low usage engines, with the camshaft being set high up, all the oil drains off it and the cam lobes starts to rust, then wear at a high rate. Lycoming now produce a 360 with roller camfollowers to overcome this, also produces a bit more power.

The end caps at each end of the wristpin in the pistons have aliminium/bronze plugs to keep it in the centre, these can break up score the cylinder and rightoff the piston.

In the Cardinal cyl 3 runs the hottest this must be corrected or the oil control ring is cooked breaks and detonation will occur at high power
due to oil blow by plus oil consumtion becomes very high.

The cylinder head redline is stated as 475f but is should be 400f with 380 or below in cruise. Above 380 cooling changes must be slow or damage can occur over time.

I do not agree the 360 is reliable and have the invoices to prove it.
To many design faults that Lycoming have never fixed, even after many attempts.

I agree the Cardinal is great to fly, the wing has forward sweep for better view. On wieght & balance, difficult to load out of C of G but can be overloaded on later models with 60usg tanks early ones have 50usg.

The RG weights 200lbs more than the FG due to the under carriage,
both can pick up approx 950lbs with 300lbs (50usg) of fuel leaves 650lbs for pay load. So easy 4 hours range with reserves.

The slot in the stabilator was fitted to overcome it stalling during landing flair.
The Cardinal can be sidesliped with any flap setting.

The most important thing on landing is approach speed control.
On an RG 72 +-2.5 mph, over speed and they eat runway.

Loverly handling aircraft with space but must be maintained by Cardinal trained people.
horizon flyer is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2012, 21:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
H-F

Your view seems a little bleek and drags up old problems that have been fixed for years, the 400 hour valve check is only for engines without the hi-chrome valve guides, I cant remember when I last saw one of these.

I cant see how a roller would have any effect of the corrosion on the face of a cam, I think it has far more to do with ease of production, rather than having to produce solid cam follower with a slightly offset face to ensure that it rotates slowly & the PR department turning it into a selling point.

The piston pin problem has nothing to do with them being ali-bronze, it is due to a step being worn in the bore.......this is becoming a real issue with the O-235 were I have seen failure starting to happen at as little as 300 hours. If you had a piston pin plug break up it is due to very poor maintenance as basic examination of the oil filter will indicate piston pin plug problemd long before total failure.
A and C is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2012, 10:56
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I'm getting keener and keener on the FG Cardinal I wonder if one could fly it around the world...
Katamarino is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2012, 12:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure you could. However, a 182 would IMHO be the better ship for that kind of adventure. Or a 210 with the ultra long-range tanks (10 hours).
172driver is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2012, 12:14
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Agreed on the 182. I'd always planned to do it in a 182 with a diesel engine.
Katamarino is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2012, 12:18
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: EHBK
Age: 58
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cessna Cardinal 177

It's been 18 - 20 years ago now but I flew both the fixed gear and RG Cardinal from Beek in the mid-90s. Both were a joy to fly and the RG in particular remains the finest all round touring aircraft I've flown. Roomy, fast (for 200hp), comfortable. But I take the point regarding the gear retraction mechanism.
Radar is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2012, 06:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On Earth
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be more than happy to fly around the world in my Cardinal FG.
Katamarino, if you are ever in the North of the UK, give me a shout and you can see two of the best FG's there are in Europe.
papa oscar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.