Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

N reg pitot static checks and EASA 145

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

N reg pitot static checks and EASA 145

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Mar 2012, 12:48
  #1 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
N reg pitot static checks and EASA 145

We need out PS checks carried out so that we're IFR legal in our N reg. Previously we had to take the aeroplane to an FAA repair station to have this completed. With the advent of some of these EASA changes and bilateral agreements, I believe now an EASA 145 maintenance organisation can carry out work on an N reg and sign this off with the same authority as an FAA repair station.

Is this true and if so can someone point me in the direction of the docs please? It is a lot easier for us to have our on-airfield EASA145 organisation sign this off than take the aeroplane somewhere to have it done.

Cheers...
englishal is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2012, 18:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Too close to EASA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The work still needs to be carried out an FAA repair station. What the bi-lateral is doing initially is transferring oversight of current EASA-FAA foreign repair stations to the local NAA. Currently this applies to companies that have a current FAA approval or had an application in for several years. There are no applications being accepted yet for new companies to get foreign repair station approval until some US TSA legal issues have been resolved.
So you'll still have to travel.
wigglyamp is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2012, 20:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read the BASA and while most of it was goggledygook which could be interpreted any way you wanted (a bit like the 1992 CAA-FAA treaty), it seemed that it provided for mutual acceptance of certification data i.e. Approved Data used to support a 337 could also be used to support an EASA Major Mod application.

Is that so?
peterh337 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2012, 20:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Too close to EASA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is some automtaic recognition/acceptance of repair data whether from the TC holder, DER or EASA Part 21J but this doesn't read across top design data. So you can't accept an FAA STC as-is in Europe - it still has to have EASA validation and the reverse in the US.
wigglyamp is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2012, 12:08
  #5 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info...
englishal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.