Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Vne is true airspeed...

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Vne is true airspeed...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Mar 2012, 03:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vne is true airspeed...

Recently read an article in Aviation Safety (Jan 2011 issue I think) with regards to ASI markings. It mentions that all the markings are based on IAS, EXCEPT for Vne. Vne is actually based on true airspeed, therefore, if flying at higher altitudes, your Vne will be reached even before your ASI shows you are near Vne.

If exceeding Vne, the effect is the airspeed can cause surface flutter. However, I can't understand how Vne is based on true airspeed? If the air density is lower, there would be less molecules hitting the surfaces, so how can the flutter occur at that lower IAS?
shumway76 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 05:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vne is a required marking on the airspeed indicator and airspeed indicator markings show indicted airspeed. Besides, the things Vne is based on (flutter, etc.) are dependent on indicated airspeed.

US FAA aircraft certification guidance
§ 23.1545 Airspeed indicator.

(a) Each airspeed indicator must be marked as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, with the marks located at the corresponding indicated airspeeds.
KKoran is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 05:48
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,615
Received 60 Likes on 43 Posts
Yes, Vne, which corresponds to Vmo (speed for maximum operation) will always be in IAS, not TAS. The report you refer to was perhaps referring to an aircraft which also had a Mach airspeed limitation (Mmo). This will still be indicated as an IAS with a moving "barber pole" pointer on the airspeed indicator which tells the pilot where the maximum permitted speed is in those atmospheric conditions.

Vne for GA aircraft is derrived from a number of factors, flutter margin being one. This speed will have a margin of safety of 1.1. For several very good reasons, you should not be deliberately flying an aircraft at these high speeds, flutter is one, upset and overloading due to gusts are others. Below Va you're safe from both of these, above Va, your piloting skill is required to maintian structural and overspeed safety (not to mention what such speeds can do to the engine and prop with carelessness).

That said, 110% of Vne is tested for every certified aircraft. It is something I have to do during every test program - very carefully!

Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 06:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In our glider planes we had an IAS marking for VNE, however in the POH was a table of pressure altitude vs VNE which showed a marked decrease of VNE with rising altitude. Flying the marked VNE or close to it at higher altitude can very easily lead to flutter and partial or total destruction of the airplane. Probably more of a problem with gliders than with most SEPs as gliders have no natural altitude limit apart from pressure breathing limitations, flying into the 300s to 400s is very much possible given the right weather conditions.
Denti is online now  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 07:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Pilot-DAR says, Vne is marked as IAS - just like everything else on the airspeed indicator. All the speeds on the ASI are indicated airspeeds - obviously

It is some of the factors which give rise to Vne that are related to TAS and not IAS - control surface flutter I think being the main one.

The amount by which TAS exceeds IAS is altitude dependent, so the ASI marking for Vne takes into account the aircraft operating ceiling - because you could legitimately climb to that altitude and then immediately commence a dive at Vne.

This causes problems if you fit a more powerful engine (e.g. as in turboprop conversions) because you can now fly higher, where the TAS gain is greater that the figure used for the original ASI marking for Vne.

So, on straight TP conversions like e.g. the Jetprop, the certification forces Vne to be marked at a lower IAS figure than on the original aircraft (piston Malibu).

At least that is my understanding
peterh337 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 08:20
  #6 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flutter is caused by the SPEED of the air molecules over the control surface not the number of molecules. So yes, Vne decreases with altitude, but as Peter points out, in your design configuration you won't be anywhere near those speed in normal operations.

The problem comes if you boy race your aeroplane, bung in an extra 200 HP with turbo and super charger, so now you can cruise at IAS-Vne at 30,000'. You will actually be over Vne-TAS.

Vans has a very good article on this on their website.
englishal is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 12:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,644
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
That said, 110% of Vne is tested for every certified aircraft. It is something I have to do during every test program - very carefully!
Pilot DAR,

That's a very impressive photo. Something I hope never to see in MY flying career. I'm surprised the altimeter pointer is not blurred.

I note there is no evidence of "white knuckles", but as you said, you do it very carefully.
India Four Two is online now  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 12:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Notice the pitch attitude and the rate of descent
peterh337 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 12:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That said, 110% of Vne is tested for every certified aircraft. It is something I have to do during every test program - very carefully!
The Vne marking on the ASI is set so that the "true" Vne is higher than the "indicated" Vne, except at the service ceiling, as said above.

But shouldn't that mean that a Vne+10% test should be done either at the service ceiling (using the ASI Vne+10%) or at a lower altitude, but then for a re-calculated TAS Vne, which is higher than the IAS Vne?

4400' doesn't seem like the service ceiling of the C172 at all...

(Am I making sense?)
BackPacker is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 12:44
  #10 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes complete sense. If you did the same as in the above pic at 18,000'.....good luck! At 4400' TRUE Vne might actually be above the red line!
englishal is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 12:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, testing indicated Vne at say 5000ft is nothing like as thorough as testing indicated Vne at the certified ceiling.

It's an interesting point.
peterh337 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 13:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK all LAA Permit aircraft have to be test flown once a year. This includes flying them up to VNE. This is a bit of a pain as it has to be done in smooth air so can delay things. I am not aware of any accidents caused as a result of this practice, but there have been a small number of flutter incidents due to rigging / finishing issues.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 15:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those who have not seen it before, here is a glider being test flown and getting flutter:


If anyone wants to challenge the wisdom of respecting VNE, I hope you are as lucky as you feel.

Chris N.
chrisN is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 15:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plumpton Green
Age: 79
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK all LAA Permit aircraft have to be test flown once a year. This includes flying them up to VNE. This is a bit of a pain as it has to be done in smooth air so can delay things.
It is permitted to conduct the Vne dive solo, which is welcomed by my usual ballast. The replacement sand bags remain equally untalkative during proceedings.
patowalker is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 15:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Milano, Italy
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the few gliders I flew have and additional placard listing the Vne changes at various altitudes. The ASI mark is at the Vne at sea level.

Mine goes from 275 km/h at sea level to 210 km/h at 8000 m.

The Vne calculation is quite complex and involves both IAS and TAS, thus the need for a table of Vne at various altitudes arises if you don't want to use the lowest one.
vihai is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 16:04
  #16 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,216
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
The LAA test schedule requires some stalls as well, and I for one won't do those in any significant turbulence either!

The test should normally be done with minimum essential crew - so if testing close to MTOW, a few sandbags are generally inevitable, although usually for an annual PtF air test, testing at an "as found" weight is usually acceptable.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 16:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plumpton Green
Age: 79
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
although usually for an annual PtF air test, testing at an "as found" weight is usually acceptable.
I once accepted an invitation to join a check pilot on the annual air test of my Quantum. It was the most exciting ride I even had in it. Saw La Baule from the most unexpected angles, but it turned out OK and that nice fellow at Deddington issued the PfT.
patowalker is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 00:20
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Vne is IAS, not TAS? Something wrong with the article I read (Aviation Safety, January 2011)?
shumway76 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 06:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vne has to be IAS because it is marked on the Airspeed Indicator (ASI)

In flight, if you want to check you are below Vne, you look on the ASI.

You don't look on the ASI, get your IAS, convert it (using altitude and temperature) into TAS and then check if the resulting value is below the ASI Vne marking. That would be completely useless.

What exactly does that article say?
peterh337 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 06:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The real VNE is a TAS, however the marking on the ASI is an IAS. In small piston engine airplanes it is apparently normal to take the lowest IAS corresponding to the real VNE and mark that on the ASI which should usually keep one save, however if you climb higher than the normal service ceiling (using updrafts, mountain waves for example) you might be in for a rude surprise if you try the marked VNE.

Since gliders do not have a service ceiling they simply mark the VNE for sea level and give the pilot information how it changes with altitude in the POH and/or a placard on the panel.
Denti is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.