C152 vs Tecnam 2002
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 7,176
Likes: 297
From: Nanaimo (CAC8)
Tecnam Golf
I flew a 152 for a few hours many years ago from Compton Abbas and I have lots of time in 172/182s. I wouldn't choose to fly a 152 unless I had no other choice. The 172 is great for flying with up to three passengers and a few bags. The 182 is my choice for "fill 'er up" and go somewhere.
Like ExSp33db1rd, I've been flying a Tecnam Golf in NZ. A lovely aircraft and a lot of fun. A few quirks, which a good instructor can sort out in one flight. I've heard comments from people that it is a bit "fragile", but I think if you handle it properly and don't slam it onto the runway, it should be no problem. BTW, the comments were from people who possibly had a vested interest in the 152-side of the argument.
Loads of fun, cheap to operate and a great view.
If I showed up at an airfield and was given a choice of a 152 or a Tecnam, I wouldn't hesitate to choose the Tecnam. I'm seriously considering a share in a Golf when I retire, although I'm also keen to see Tecnam's new tail-dragger.
Like ExSp33db1rd, I've been flying a Tecnam Golf in NZ. A lovely aircraft and a lot of fun. A few quirks, which a good instructor can sort out in one flight. I've heard comments from people that it is a bit "fragile", but I think if you handle it properly and don't slam it onto the runway, it should be no problem. BTW, the comments were from people who possibly had a vested interest in the 152-side of the argument.
Loads of fun, cheap to operate and a great view.
If I showed up at an airfield and was given a choice of a 152 or a Tecnam, I wouldn't hesitate to choose the Tecnam. I'm seriously considering a share in a Golf when I retire, although I'm also keen to see Tecnam's new tail-dragger.
