Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Reckless pilot to jail

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Reckless pilot to jail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th January 2012 | 18:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,089
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
Reckless pilot to jail

Some really reckless flying results in jail time:

Sask. pilot gets 9-month sentence in N.W.T. death - Saskatchewan - CBC News

The text is:

A Saskatchewan pilot has been sentenced to nine months in jail for his role in a fatal airplane accident in the Northwest Territories.
Parker James Butterfield, 24, pleaded guilty last year to dangerous operation of an aircraft in connection with the May 20, 2010, incident that killed William James John Bleach, a friend and fellow pilot, in Fort Good Hope, N.W.T.
William Bleach, seen in an undated photo, died days after the May 20, 2010, incident in Fort Good Hope, N.W.T., where he was struck in the head by the wing of a low-lying light plane. (Facebook)The sentence was handed down Monday afternoon in a Regina courtroom. The Crown had asked that Butterfield serve as much as 18 months in jail, but a Queen's Bench judge sentenced him to half that much time.
The judge has also banned Butterfield from flying for two years.
"I'm devastated," Bleach's mother, Marilyn Bleach, told reporters outside the courthouse.
"I was hoping that there would be a longer-term incarceration, I really did. And I am shocked that he doesn't lose his licence."
Bleach, 26, was standing on the tarmac of the local airport with a video camera, filming a single-engine Cessna 207 that Butterfield was flying, when he was struck by the wing of the low-flying aircraft.
Transport officials have said the aircraft's right wing clipped Bleach's head. He died in an Edmonton hospital several days after the incident.
At the time of the incident, Butterfield and Bleach were working in Fort Good Hope for North-Wright Airways Ltd., which flies people and freight between eight remote communities in the Northwest Territories using a fleet of 21 small aircraft.
In sentencing, the judge said Butterfield is remorseful and poses a low risk to reoffend. At the same time, jail time is warranted for operating an aircraft dangerously, the judge ruled.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 18:21
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 748
Likes: 9
From: LFMD
Flying low enough to hit someone in the head with the wing of a 207 is quite an achievement - means that the wheels were less than a foot off the ground, in fact more like a few inches unless the victim was a giant.
n5296s is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 19:00
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 2
From: Iraq and other places
Flying low enough to hit someone in the head with the wing of a 207 is quite an achievement - means that the wheels were less than a foot off the ground, in fact more like a few inches unless the victim was a giant.
I'm guessing it was banked.
Katamarino is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 20:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Europe
I'm guessing it was banked.
That's even worse, banking into a person instead of banking away to avoid... that makes it look almost intentional.
NazgulAir is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 20:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Bleach, 26, was standing on the tarmac of the local airport with a video camera, filming a single-engine Cessna 207 that Butterfield was flying,
Huh?? Did he not see it coming??

I find it hard to visualise how this happened, with Bleach watching the 207. Were they both playing chicken?
dublinpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 21:46
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 475
Likes: 7
From: UK
Like the incident at Husbands Bosworth, the videoing was pre-arranged.
Russell Gulch is offline  
Reply
Old 10th January 2012 | 22:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: UK
From the way I read the report, it was a pre-arranged filming of some low flying that went badly wrong. Perhaps he was banking the aircraft close to the ground to try and get a shot of a low pass.

Either way, I'm surprised how short the sentence is. What would be the sentence for causing death by reckless driving?
RTN11 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 00:19
  #8 (permalink)  
cct
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, UK
These days it seems a few weeks - and suspended
cct is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 06:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: London
What would be the sentence for causing death by reckless driving?
In the UK: Sentences for causing death by driving

See page 11 of the document for causing death by dangerous driving.


FL
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 07:05
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Inverness-shire
Pre-arranged filming risks:-

a) Pilot pushing the limits "showing off" to the camera

b) Cameraman divorced from reality/sense of danger because he's seeing it happening through a viewfinder.

The famous "f*** me, f*** me" video of a well known presenter being surprised by a very low flying Spitfire is a great laugh, but illustrates the problem. The margins were not great and the cameraman didn't even duck.
astir 8 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 07:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: London
cjboy
the court certainly knew more about the situation than anyone reading about it on an internet forum.
Precisely.

An important point that's often overlooked.


FL
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 12:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: London
astir 8
The margins were not great and the cameraman didn't even duck.
The margins were greater than they appear to be on the video.
Given who was flying the Spitfire, I wouldn't have ducked.


FL
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 12:35
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 57
From: Surrey, UK ;
Flying Lawyer

And he is so sadly and badly missed
Dave Gittins is offline  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 12:38
  #14 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 15,200
Likes: 1,202
From: Too close to Croydon for comfort
The margins were greater than they appear to be on the video.
Given who was flying the Spitfire, I wouldn't have ducked.
At least 20 feet I believe.

Have you ever seen the pic of Ken Ellis flat on the ground at Bembridge after the same individual, P-40 mounted, came in low for the finish during the Schneider Trophy one year?

Edit: just to say that the P-40 was quite high by the usual standards of his low passes - but Ken was probably just playing it safe!

Last edited by treadigraph; 11th January 2012 at 21:10.
treadigraph is online now  
Reply
Old 11th January 2012 | 21:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Didn't an aircraft landing on runway 25 at Shoreham once hit a pedestrian walking on the perimeter road?
NazgulAir is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2012 | 03:24
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,089
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
Given who was flying the Spitfire, I wouldn't have ducked.
It's more auspicious to risk being hit by a Spitfire?

A pilot can care about the safety of others, and obviously demonstrate that in the way they fly...

A pilot can not care, and be oblivious of other's safety...

Or the pilot can be overtly reckless, and point a plane at another person. If driving, it would be "dangerous driving", a criminal offense in Canada.

Whenever I hear a pilot say "watch this" it causes me concern.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2012 | 08:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
I would think that deliberately aiming a car (or plane) at somebody would be a lot more than "dangerous".

You can get done for "dangerous" driving without any evident intent to harm any specific person.
peterh337 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2012 | 17:54
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: London
Pilot DAR
It's more auspicious to risk being hit by a Spitfire?
I was referring to the pilot, not the aircraft.


A pilot can care about the safety of others, and obviously demonstrate that in the way they fly...
He did.


FL
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Reply
Old 12th January 2012 | 18:12
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,089
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
He did.
In this instance, I shall not disagree, or agree....
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2012 | 00:07
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Europe
In this instance, I shall not disagree, or agree....
So you're sitting on the fence doing what?
NazgulAir is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.