A Few Questions about Private Flying
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hull
Age: 35
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuji Bound,
Is L2K, Le Touqeut in France? Googled it but couldn't find anything. That comment helped a great deal, it's what I joined and posted on the forum for, so thank you.
Nazgul,
Very inspiring, although I'm not sure I'd be so adventurous for a long time yet.
Thanks for the feedback guys. I posted a 2nd more specific thread, but all my questions have been answered and I'm definitely going full team ahead with my PPL.
Is L2K, Le Touqeut in France? Googled it but couldn't find anything. That comment helped a great deal, it's what I joined and posted on the forum for, so thank you.
Nazgul,
Very inspiring, although I'm not sure I'd be so adventurous for a long time yet.
Thanks for the feedback guys. I posted a 2nd more specific thread, but all my questions have been answered and I'm definitely going full team ahead with my PPL.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A C172 with pilot and 3 adult passengers, loaded legally, will just about make it to the next airfield down the road - say 10 miles.
G
G
My 172 will carry pilot and 3 pax, loaded completely legally for 5 hours at 128kts........
Is L2K, Le Touqeut in France?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah but bose yours is hardly a normal 172 in fact i have heard said better than a tb20, jan hardly an acronym say slowly l ..... 2 ....... K its not difficult or clever just phoenetics.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Cessna could never compete with the continent crossing airliner capabilities of the TB20. I understand they are considering adapting a TB20 for the mission to mars project.....
The Cessna does do rather well at flying to GA airfields for lunch and a pee though..... And it can even be handflown and used for IFR....
The Cessna does do rather well at flying to GA airfields for lunch and a pee though..... And it can even be handflown and used for IFR....
I just looked up the Post Flight Report for a C172P I did an air test on last month.
I put down that with just me (180lb) and full fuel, I was at 1864lb, which was 81% MTOW - MTOW 2300lb I believe.
So, add in another 3 medium sized adults I'd have to lose 17 gallons of fuel to be on MTOW, which would give me 26 gallons of fuel. Allow 9 gallons an hour, and assume landing with an hour's fuel, that gives me about 1:50 airborne time.
Okay, my 10 miles comment was a bit pessimistic. You'd manage around 200 miles.
G
I put down that with just me (180lb) and full fuel, I was at 1864lb, which was 81% MTOW - MTOW 2300lb I believe.
So, add in another 3 medium sized adults I'd have to lose 17 gallons of fuel to be on MTOW, which would give me 26 gallons of fuel. Allow 9 gallons an hour, and assume landing with an hour's fuel, that gives me about 1:50 airborne time.
Okay, my 10 miles comment was a bit pessimistic. You'd manage around 200 miles.
G
Slightly overweight, I'm assured. And big boned.
Something that probably applies to a very large proportion of adults these days! How slightly of-course, varies.
G
Something that probably applies to a very large proportion of adults these days! How slightly of-course, varies.
G
Fuji, many of us are "big boned" or just not the "standard" adult imagined with most 4 seat designs which, in reality, are 2-3 seaters unless one talks parents with kids.
Realistically speaking, a "true" 4 seater would require a payload of around 400 kgs plus the fuel necessary for the trip. Not many airplanes I know do that. 400 kgs, that is a standard IATA adult plus his bags times 4.
That means, the typical 50 USG aircraft would need to have a total payload (Empty to MTOW) of around 550 kgs.
The "average" family of four, if calculated conservatively, will be less. Again, 2 standard adults with bags (200 kgs) plus 2 kids with bags (around 60 kgs each) will demand a payload of around 320 kgs plus fuel.
As to the protests of some lady passengers or pilot that they do not fit the description of a 100 kg adult, thank you very much, I fully agree, but take into account their baggage and many do. Apart, many think of a GA plane as their own airbound sedan, what fits comes along.
Realistically speaking, a "true" 4 seater would require a payload of around 400 kgs plus the fuel necessary for the trip. Not many airplanes I know do that. 400 kgs, that is a standard IATA adult plus his bags times 4.
That means, the typical 50 USG aircraft would need to have a total payload (Empty to MTOW) of around 550 kgs.
The "average" family of four, if calculated conservatively, will be less. Again, 2 standard adults with bags (200 kgs) plus 2 kids with bags (around 60 kgs each) will demand a payload of around 320 kgs plus fuel.
As to the protests of some lady passengers or pilot that they do not fit the description of a 100 kg adult, thank you very much, I fully agree, but take into account their baggage and many do. Apart, many think of a GA plane as their own airbound sedan, what fits comes along.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, my 10 miles comment was a bit pessimistic. You'd manage around 200 miles.
Bose - dont you pee in flight or have you got a big bladder?
But whatever floats your boat!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't right now think of anything more dim than limiting one's range by the need to have a pee somewhere on the ground.
But hey, like I said whatever floats your boat. I guess you Brighton boys are a bit more 'relaxed' in company.......
I just looked up the Post Flight Report for a C172P I did an air test on last month.
I put down that with just me (180lb) and full fuel, I was at 1864lb, which was 81% MTOW - MTOW 2300lb I believe.
So, add in another 3 medium sized adults I'd have to lose 17 gallons of fuel to be on MTOW, which would give me 26 gallons of fuel. Allow 9 gallons an hour, and assume landing with an hour's fuel, that gives me about 1:50 airborne time.
Okay, my 10 miles comment was a bit pessimistic. You'd manage around 200 miles.
G
I put down that with just me (180lb) and full fuel, I was at 1864lb, which was 81% MTOW - MTOW 2300lb I believe.
So, add in another 3 medium sized adults I'd have to lose 17 gallons of fuel to be on MTOW, which would give me 26 gallons of fuel. Allow 9 gallons an hour, and assume landing with an hour's fuel, that gives me about 1:50 airborne time.
Okay, my 10 miles comment was a bit pessimistic. You'd manage around 200 miles.
G
The POH specifies that 1.1 gallons will be used for start/taxi and runup so you can add the last .5 gal to full (standard) tanks and have 3.5 pounds to spare for inflight snacks during your 3+45 flight
Last edited by Big Pistons Forever; 17th Jan 2012 at 21:25.