Question about maximum elevation figures
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: UK
Question about maximum elevation figures
Just doing some nav planning. Looking at the MEF in each section of the chart, I'm looking to see where in that section is the ground which is likely to feature the MEF. In many instances, the MEF is higher than the spot heights or other elevations. Why would that be?

Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,401
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Correct. An obstacle of less than 300ft a.g.l. (e.g. a temporary mast) doesn't have to be notified to the CAA - so the MEF allows for this. For example, Lundy Island has a spot height of 466ft - but an unknown obstacle of 299ft might exist, so the MEF is (466+299) = 765ft, which is rounded up to the 08 shown on the chart.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
The other thing to be aware of is that the UK ICAO chart you're using has MEF figures on it. But charts from other providers, in particular Jeppessen, may have MSA figures on them instead. Essentially MSA = MEF plus 1000' but there are some subtle situations where that's not quite the case.




