NPPL question - taxiing emergencies?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge, UK
Age: 47
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NPPL question - taxiing emergencies?
I'm about half way through my UK NPPL (SLMG), and noticed an item on the syllabus:
5e. Taxiing emergencies
I've no idea what this is intended to cover, and my instructor isn't too sure either, so we both said we would find out.
Can anyone shed any light on it?
Thanks.
5e. Taxiing emergencies
I've no idea what this is intended to cover, and my instructor isn't too sure either, so we both said we would find out.
Can anyone shed any light on it?
Thanks.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The brake failure above is a good one, but also rather obvious: Steer away from any obstacles, shut down the engine, try to avoid a collision.
Another emergency I could think of would be some kind of engine fire.
And then you've got the C172 flip-on-the-back-in-high-winds type of emergency. But once that happens, you're a passenger along for the ride anyway. The only thing you can do is shut off the fuel and get the hell out.
But honestly, from what I've seen so far is that distraction (e.g. trying to do the power checks/controls free/other checks while taxiing) and trying to maneuver in a confined space while not looking at your wingtips well enough, are the major causes of damage during taxi.
We almost had to write off a PA28 because somebody taxied the wingtip into another aircraft. Eventually the whole spar box had to be replaced.
Another emergency I could think of would be some kind of engine fire.
And then you've got the C172 flip-on-the-back-in-high-winds type of emergency. But once that happens, you're a passenger along for the ride anyway. The only thing you can do is shut off the fuel and get the hell out.
But honestly, from what I've seen so far is that distraction (e.g. trying to do the power checks/controls free/other checks while taxiing) and trying to maneuver in a confined space while not looking at your wingtips well enough, are the major causes of damage during taxi.
We almost had to write off a PA28 because somebody taxied the wingtip into another aircraft. Eventually the whole spar box had to be replaced.
I've no idea what this is intended to cover, and my instructor isn't too sure either,
Cabin Fire; Evacuation drill; Steering and Brake Failure are pretty obvious starters.
Obvious thing to do is have the instructor ask the examiner what they'll be examining!
Real taxiing emergencies I've come across - nosewheel steering failure, brake failure, tyre burst, radio failure, somebody else crashing in field of view, engine fire, one aeroplane taxiing into another, aeroplane having a throttle runaway into the side of a hangar.
I've only had the first four myself, as well as carb ice whilst taxiing with a couple of smaller Continental engines.
G
Real taxiing emergencies I've come across - nosewheel steering failure, brake failure, tyre burst, radio failure, somebody else crashing in field of view, engine fire, one aeroplane taxiing into another, aeroplane having a throttle runaway into the side of a hangar.
I've only had the first four myself, as well as carb ice whilst taxiing with a couple of smaller Continental engines.
G
Obvious thing to do is have the instructor ask the examiner what they'll be examining!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: THE NORTH
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Carb Ice!
Not really one of the taxing emergencies, but the best place to show the effects of carb ice. The 0-200 and 0-235 are great for it on the right day.
Flying tiger.
If you/your instructor are struggling with this have a think about what you would consider an emergency.
Flying tiger.
If you/your instructor are struggling with this have a think about what you would consider an emergency.
My CPL examiner sent me on the same route, with the same diversion, as he had sent my CPL instructor several years previously. I'd been briefed to expect that, and I got it!
I'm training a fellow for his NPPL at the moment, and took the time to ask the examiner which of the many perfectly legitimate ways to handle certain aspects of nav and emergencies he prefers. So, I'm training my student accordingly - I'll make sure he's a safe pilot who knows the syllabus, but I also want him to pass first time with the examiner he'll get.
Question spotting is, sadly, an inevitability of any formal examined system. Which makes for an interesting point - the exam itself becomes incredibly critical because it will ultimately define the training regime far more than any published syllabus will.
When I was a University Lecturer I used to regularly get complaints from the students for delivering questions that didn't match their expectations, or the patterns they'd derived from looking through old exam papers. That is how people think, and it's fair to argue that they should just learn the syllabus, but at the same time - that's exactly what I used to do as an undergraduate as well.
G
The one ground emergency I lived wasn't even taxiing - we were ready for take-off and just waiting for a PA28 to land, then line up after him (at a non-controlled field); luckily our plane was in such a position we had full sight of the short finals area. For a reason best known to himself, the PA28 pilot decided to land 200 feet or so to the left of the runway, alarmingly close to where we stood. My instructor had quicker wits than myself and applied full power to get out of the way! Lesson learned: keep at least half an eye on the short finals area ALL THE WHILE.
(although of course the real champions will find even more elusive ways to catch us at unawares.)
(although of course the real champions will find even more elusive ways to catch us at unawares.)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fact is that you don't spend a whole lesson doing 5 and 5e, they are incorporated at the beginning and end of each lesson and you build up the experience over time until you can taxi safely without the instructor hovering over the brakes.
5E would include a saftey brief, which I hope you're instructor gave you at the beginning of the course, and once you are more proficient it would incorporate a discussion about engine fire on the ground, brake failure, steering failure and the correct actions to take, possibly with some touch drills in the aircraft to follow up.
If your instructor doesn't know this is on the syllabus, I would seriously consider another instructor as this is a key safetly point.
5E would include a saftey brief, which I hope you're instructor gave you at the beginning of the course, and once you are more proficient it would incorporate a discussion about engine fire on the ground, brake failure, steering failure and the correct actions to take, possibly with some touch drills in the aircraft to follow up.
If your instructor doesn't know this is on the syllabus, I would seriously consider another instructor as this is a key safetly point.
When I was a University Lecturer I used to regularly get complaints from the students for delivering questions that didn't match their expectations, or the patterns they'd derived from looking through old exam papers. That is how people think, and it's fair to argue that they should just learn the syllabus, but at the same time - that's exactly what I used to do as an undergraduate as well.
Firstly the syllabus was too vague - 'describe the basic components of the auditory system and their function' means something quite different to a medical student or a neurosciences student, and what does 'basic' mean anyway? My undergraduate and PhD syllabuses were basically identical, but 'basic' meant rather different things in each case. In general, what you need to know is far better defined by the exam questions than the syllabus.
Secondly, many people learn best by doing. Any maths student will have spent ages working out proofs and answers to challenging problems. They don't just learn the rules of calculus by heart. Psychologically speaking, there's a fundamental difference between learning texts 'Carb ice can cause your engine to run roughly...[explanation of meteorology and carb construction...]. An overly rich or lean mixture can cause your engine to run roughly' and learning by answering questions like 'You're flying straight and level at 5000 feet when your engine starts to run rough - list your initial actions.'
Thirdly... it's difficult to be aware of what you don't know and to identify misconceptions if you don't test your understanding and breadth of knowledge somehow. This is why feedback is so important. As an aside, my university didn't believe in feedback - they gave some justification for this, but really it saved huge amounts of money because it meant they could use the same question bank year after year.
In my view, this approach was an unmitigated disaster. Students would not be told what they'd done wrong - something that's psychologically devastating if you fail an exam unexpectedly and potentially very dangerous in the medical faculty. And paradoxically, it seemed to favour the 'learn-by-rote' rather than the 'learn by understanding' people - exactly the problem the approach was intended to avoid. The 'learn by rote' crowd just made flashcards of every factoid in their textbooks - not a bad approach to preparing for multiple choice questions if you have that sort of mind. In contrast, the 'learn by understanding' people were never given the tools (worked questions) that they needed in order to learn effectively.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Strathaven Airfield
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ask your instructor.
If he/she doesn't know, expect a reply along the lines of: "I will find out."
If you don't get the info - especially info you have asked for and are paying for - you should have a word with the CFI. They cannot listen in to every student/instructor interaction, so your feedback is vital.
If the CFI doesn't answer, check out another flying school.
Yes, I am a NPPL M instructor, CFI (two FIs and an AFI working with me) and a Flight Examiner.
In flight and on the ground emergencies are, in my experience, something not well covered in training. Yet, in my experience, far more likely - when they happen - to have far more serious consequencies than drifting a few degrees off heading or 150ft (instead of 100ft) off an altitude.
What are the key points of an engine fire on the ground? Number 1: get out of the aircraft!
Yes, it is good to make sure the engine is downwind - so in a weightshift, or some amphibians, nose INTO wind! - so as flames are taken away from cockpit. But it could be argued, there is a firewall there, so just stop and get out. But in a Cherokee, where all four occupants have to get out the passenger side (and the pax may be on their first ever flight!), there might be other priorities.
Then, since you are getting out the aircraft, a good idea to stop the head chopper turning too.
I suppose the third thing is the insurance certificate! Then you don't need to worry about fuel off (because fuel taps can be a pain to reach - thinking of flexwings in particular where getting to the tap could halt the rear seat occupant from vacating, see point one.)
So all I look for is mags off (ie prop stopped) and get out.
(The rest: ie fuel off, master off - even engine downwind - is all icing on the cake. You should have briefed any pax about how to open the door, safe exit path etc in the pre-flight brief)
In the air, it is fuel off, mags on and stay in!
Get your instructor to sit in the aircraft with you on bad weather days - the weight will help stop it being blown away! - and go through the drills. As you become more experienced and confident, you'll be amazed at what you can do in a very short period of time - ie a couple of seconds. You'll be able to go for the fully iced cake!
The whole point of all this is that when it happens - and it will - you don't have to spend time thinking. And that stretches time, so everything happens in slow motion and you have more time to react and achieve a safe result.
Happy flying!
If he/she doesn't know, expect a reply along the lines of: "I will find out."
If you don't get the info - especially info you have asked for and are paying for - you should have a word with the CFI. They cannot listen in to every student/instructor interaction, so your feedback is vital.
If the CFI doesn't answer, check out another flying school.
Yes, I am a NPPL M instructor, CFI (two FIs and an AFI working with me) and a Flight Examiner.
In flight and on the ground emergencies are, in my experience, something not well covered in training. Yet, in my experience, far more likely - when they happen - to have far more serious consequencies than drifting a few degrees off heading or 150ft (instead of 100ft) off an altitude.
What are the key points of an engine fire on the ground? Number 1: get out of the aircraft!
Yes, it is good to make sure the engine is downwind - so in a weightshift, or some amphibians, nose INTO wind! - so as flames are taken away from cockpit. But it could be argued, there is a firewall there, so just stop and get out. But in a Cherokee, where all four occupants have to get out the passenger side (and the pax may be on their first ever flight!), there might be other priorities.
Then, since you are getting out the aircraft, a good idea to stop the head chopper turning too.
I suppose the third thing is the insurance certificate! Then you don't need to worry about fuel off (because fuel taps can be a pain to reach - thinking of flexwings in particular where getting to the tap could halt the rear seat occupant from vacating, see point one.)
So all I look for is mags off (ie prop stopped) and get out.
(The rest: ie fuel off, master off - even engine downwind - is all icing on the cake. You should have briefed any pax about how to open the door, safe exit path etc in the pre-flight brief)
In the air, it is fuel off, mags on and stay in!
Get your instructor to sit in the aircraft with you on bad weather days - the weight will help stop it being blown away! - and go through the drills. As you become more experienced and confident, you'll be amazed at what you can do in a very short period of time - ie a couple of seconds. You'll be able to go for the fully iced cake!
The whole point of all this is that when it happens - and it will - you don't have to spend time thinking. And that stretches time, so everything happens in slow motion and you have more time to react and achieve a safe result.
Happy flying!
A PhD syllabus! There's a fascinating concept.
Last edited by abgd; 5th Jan 2012 at 18:11.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge, UK
Age: 47
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the input, especially xrayalpha, lots of useful info there.
I would just like to say in the defence of my (excellent) instructor that the club has only just started teaching to the NPPL syllabus - I am only the second student - and hence a bit of a guinea pig. I am not being charged anything for the instruction, just covering the costs of the airtime and exams.
I would just like to say in the defence of my (excellent) instructor that the club has only just started teaching to the NPPL syllabus - I am only the second student - and hence a bit of a guinea pig. I am not being charged anything for the instruction, just covering the costs of the airtime and exams.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And then you've got the C172 flip-on-the-back-in-high-winds type of emergency. But once that happens, you're a passenger along for the ride anyway. The only thing you can do is shut off the fuel and get the hell out.
Brake Failure, taxiing too fast, and people on the apron (how quick can you shut down the engine) spring to mind for taxiing emergencies... oh and how to read a taxi plate... "vacate and hold Charlie...what?? whose Charlie?"
but most examiners have their own flavours and preferences.
The Examiner's role is to conduct a balanced assessment of the students ability to operate the aeroplane in a safe and consistent manner; it is the instructors job to ensure that he has trained the student to do that, and not cherry pick around his perception of the Examiner's likes and dislikes.
Because of the jumping through well prepared hoops that prevails in our modern education system, there is a growing perception amongst many of the younger students that all you have to do is tick the boxes to get a licence. The concept of covering a broad syllabus and demonstrating skill, good judgement and relevant knowledge across this wide spectrum is totally alien to many. They are used to the quick fix.
Because of the jumping through well prepared hoops that prevails in our modern education system, there is a growing perception amongst many of the younger students that all you have to do is tick the boxes to get a licence. The concept of covering a broad syllabus and demonstrating skill, good judgement and relevant knowledge across this wide spectrum is totally alien to many
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Taxying emergencies? try doing some training on a taildragger. You can create your own interesting emergency by using the brakes......
Story goes that at Booker Gliding Club an attractive and experienced woman pilot (not me) had just been cleard by the resident Deity (CFI) to solo in the l80 hp Supercub. No sooner had the CFI stepped down and moved away a bit, than she tipped the Cub on its nose. Easy done, take my word for it.....
Story goes that at Booker Gliding Club an attractive and experienced woman pilot (not me) had just been cleard by the resident Deity (CFI) to solo in the l80 hp Supercub. No sooner had the CFI stepped down and moved away a bit, than she tipped the Cub on its nose. Easy done, take my word for it.....