A GPS range question.
Thread Starter
A GPS range question.
Just wondering....if my very basic GPS not even a map...just lat long....gives me a distance from a ground way-point of 5 miles and I'm flying at 10.000ft ....aprox 2 miles high over the sea,
That 5 miles from the way-point... is that ground based 5 miles or a slant angle 5 miles.
Nick.
That 5 miles from the way-point... is that ground based 5 miles or a slant angle 5 miles.
Nick.
It is certainly not a slant range, but I've never seen it stated if it is the distance at your present altitude or the distance on the WGS84 surface (ellipsoid) - although in practice the difference will not be huge unless you are seven miles high and traveling half way around the world where there could be a 22 mile or so difference!
Moderator
Noting that Jim59 did say it is not slant distance...
For my experience, when you enter, then navigate toward an intermediate waypoint on the GPS, you have not entered an altitude associated with that navigating waypoint. With accurate flying, you could arrive exactly on the waypoint - zero distance, without being told that you are above or below it.
but I've never seen it stated if it is the distance at your present altitude or the distance on the WGS84 surface
Upon reflection it will give horizontal distance assuming that you are on the surface of the WGS84 ellipsoid - a mathematical approximation to the shape of the Earth used for aviation GPS purposes..
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In reality, and in simple terms, the GPS unit derives it's position by reference to several satellites. Simple speed, distance, time calculations knowing the speed and time elements of signals generated by the satellites. From that position translated to the surface it will work out the distance to the required waypoint.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The correct answer is "It entirely depends on the receiver, and possibly the settings".
If it's important, I suggest testing it by flying at 5,000 ft directly over the top of a ground way-point and look at the distance being displayed.
If you want to be really anal, remember also that "ground distance" is a very imperfect term. Does it mean "surface distance"? Highly unlikely, so it will almost certainly only be an approximation, as Jim59 stated, based on a strategy like WGS84 (but not necessarily that one), which means that the "ground" distance being calculated could be an imaginary surface several hundred feet above or below the surface you're flying over - although unless you're flying a long way, that won't make a massive difference.
If it's important, I suggest testing it by flying at 5,000 ft directly over the top of a ground way-point and look at the distance being displayed.
If you want to be really anal, remember also that "ground distance" is a very imperfect term. Does it mean "surface distance"? Highly unlikely, so it will almost certainly only be an approximation, as Jim59 stated, based on a strategy like WGS84 (but not necessarily that one), which means that the "ground" distance being calculated could be an imaginary surface several hundred feet above or below the surface you're flying over - although unless you're flying a long way, that won't make a massive difference.
but isn't the GPS receiver measuring the distance from the transmitting satellite.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AFAIK GPS never gives you any kind of "slant" range.
If you set say two waypoints, which the GPS says are 10.000nm apart, that will be the great circle distance between them as measured along the surface of the ellipsoid which approximates the MSL surface.
One could argue that since an ellipsoid is not a sphere, then if you start on say a point on the equator and move to the north or to the south, you are actually going slightly downhill even if you remain at sea level the whole time. But this effect is miniscule.
The altitude portion of the GPS solution comes out of the same calculation as lat/long but is normally presented separately because that's the way we like it. The altitude reading does have a correction applied to it, to correct for the deviation between the ellipsoid and the true MSL surface, but this doesn't affect the horizontal distance.
The science behind GPS is extremely complicated but the end result is very very simple.
If you set say two waypoints, which the GPS says are 10.000nm apart, that will be the great circle distance between them as measured along the surface of the ellipsoid which approximates the MSL surface.
One could argue that since an ellipsoid is not a sphere, then if you start on say a point on the equator and move to the north or to the south, you are actually going slightly downhill even if you remain at sea level the whole time. But this effect is miniscule.
The altitude portion of the GPS solution comes out of the same calculation as lat/long but is normally presented separately because that's the way we like it. The altitude reading does have a correction applied to it, to correct for the deviation between the ellipsoid and the true MSL surface, but this doesn't affect the horizontal distance.
The science behind GPS is extremely complicated but the end result is very very simple.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aviation GPSs definitely measure range to a position vertically above a waypoint. They definitely show 0 distance when 10000 feet above a VORDME with the DME showing 2 miles.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Peter,
It entirely depends on the GPS device. 'GPS' doesn't have a protocol for distances between waypoints, so it's at the discretion of the developer of the device. But as aviation navigation devices are designed for navigation rather than true vector/distance finding, then you'll have likely been exposed to more examples where the device measures waypoints as you describe.
The OP didn't state what the GPS device was, and as it sounded like it was an incredibly simple device, it may not have been programmed as a navigation device in the way you're used to.
So back to my original response 'it entirely depends in the device / settings'.
Also, the principal of GPS is actually incredibly simple. The translation of GPS into a navigation tool is extremely complicated. And of course, the implementation of GPS is an astonishing accomplishment in itself!
It entirely depends on the GPS device. 'GPS' doesn't have a protocol for distances between waypoints, so it's at the discretion of the developer of the device. But as aviation navigation devices are designed for navigation rather than true vector/distance finding, then you'll have likely been exposed to more examples where the device measures waypoints as you describe.
The OP didn't state what the GPS device was, and as it sounded like it was an incredibly simple device, it may not have been programmed as a navigation device in the way you're used to.
So back to my original response 'it entirely depends in the device / settings'.
Also, the principal of GPS is actually incredibly simple. The translation of GPS into a navigation tool is extremely complicated. And of course, the implementation of GPS is an astonishing accomplishment in itself!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless your GPS allows you to set target elevations for your waypoints, it seems pointless to have it do its navigation calculation from a point in space to another point in space (i.e. a 3d track - probably on a trajectory, as a straight line over a reasonable distance may well actually go under ground).
The basic position derived from the satellites is going to be a declination, 'right ascension' and range (i.e. a spherical coordinate system). Ignoring the range, you map this pretty straight into Lat/Lon on the ellipsoid. Then the standard range and direction formula give Great Circle distance along a sphere, which I imagine is what the cheap GPS use rather than the ellipsoid formula or some more complex logic of a 3d path through a specific frame of reference.
------
The simple answer remains, it is virtually certain a 'normal' or 'cheap' GPS will do range and bearing calculations based on the lat/lon and ignore altitude (either yours or the waypoints) - hence not slant range.
Last edited by mm_flynn; 26th Dec 2011 at 21:32.
