Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Bugs and flies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jul 2011, 20:21
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back on topic - right at the beginning someone said "squirty multi-surface cleaner". Perhaps that was too subtle, so I will name the magic bug solvent I use as "Pledge".

Intended for polishing furniture, the waxy liquid acts as a mild solvent for removing dead bugs from the leading edges if you have let them dry to a crust. Spray a LOT on - we are not polishing furniture here, we're softening corpses - wait a few moments, and then wipe 'em off. It definitely works better than water.

And no, I don't recommend it for the windows.
CJ Driver is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2011, 00:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by good finish
having bugs on the wings must impact the laminar flow and thus reduce the lift produced requiring more throttle - maybe though its a negligible amount?
It depends on how the wing was designed: if it was designed as a laminar flow wing, then bugs will have a measurable impact on its performance.
A conventional wing, on the other hand, does not rely on any significant portion of the profile having a laminar boundary layer, so any bugs, rivets, dents etc. won't make that much of a difference.
Deeday is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2011, 10:00
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Uk
Age: 56
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are most light aircraft wings laminar flow or conventional?
good finish is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2011, 10:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most are not laminar flow. I believe this is to do with the difficulties in manufacturing a flawless surface (no exposed rivet heads, panel edges,etc).

I drive a composite aircraft with a flawless wing that is not designed to be a proper laminar flow wing. I still clean the bugs off the leading edges if there has been a noticeable build up. This is as much about evening up stall behaviour as maintaining performance and is based on guesswork rather than empirical evidence.

I'm far more concerned about dead flies on my prop though. I've never noticed degraded performance due to flies on a wing but a prop covered in flies is less efficient and I'm sure it could be proved. My prop gets proportionately far more fly coverage than my wings. I clean my prop whenever I think its needed as a fuel saving measure.
FleetFlyer is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2011, 11:30
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Laminar flow wings are the exception, as far as I know. Not only for the smoothness required for the surface, but also because you need to use a laminar profile and they are not so good at high alpha/low speed (they stall earlier and more abruptly).
The P-51 Mustang springs to mind as an example of laminar wing (maybe the SF-260 too? can't remember). Nowadays I believe it's almost exclusively high-performance gliders.
Deeday is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2011, 13:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,795
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
and most kit/plans built canards?
Jan Olieslagers is online now  
Old 6th Jul 2011, 19:50
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Uk
Age: 56
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
presumably propellors are laminar flow?

on a seperate note Halford's do an excellent sponge for £1.99 that is for removing bugs - it has a plastic netting over it that is not abrasive. a wash with that in water that has some MER polish in it -then dried off with a clean cloth- worked wonders today.
good finish is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.