Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Flying in Europe versus the USA in a nutshell

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Flying in Europe versus the USA in a nutshell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Apr 2011, 14:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying in Europe versus the USA in a nutshell

I imagine many of you have flown both in Europe and the USA. I understand that this question very well *could* be answered in maybe 2,500 pages but may I kindly ask: what are the MAIN differences between flying in Europe versus the USA, pertaining to the following talking points:

1. aircraft
2. private pilot training
3. airspace
4. FAA versus ______?
5. security
6. public acceptance of GA?

For example, pertaining to #6, here in the US, many feel that small airfields are nothing more than playgrounds for the "rich people" and all the middle class get out of it is the buzzing sound of single pistons coming through their windows at dinnertime.

For those that have flown in both theaters, which one do you like better, and why? Thanks for any replies. I am hoping some day to make a trip to Europe and do some flying on my own to explore the countryside.
Plasmech is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 14:44
  #2 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I prefer the USA. Everything is easier, you can fly pretty much where you want (with appropriate clearances), you can land pretty much where you want whenever you want (airports may close, but you can still use the airport), and the end user fees are much more reasonable.

However, flying over the green fields of a Europe in summer does have its wonderful moments too, so I recommend comming over and having a go
englishal is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 14:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You cannot land at an airfield with a closed office? What prevents you from doing this, do they put obstacles on the runway?
Plasmech is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 14:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 Aircraft, more variety in America, prices a little less, but no where near as much as they were, training fleets on the whole in better condition,

2 Training, not that much between the two - some good, some bad as always, although the American approach to IRs is WAY better,

3 Different, but then the UK is different from France is different from many other European countries BUT the airspace in American operates in a more intuitive and seamless way,

4 FAA, CAA, EASA - the FAA are very good, the CAA are equally good, EASA (about to take over from the CAA) havent a clue and will cause much damage to GA this side of the Pond unless someone sorts them out soon,

5 Security - not a lot of difference, the security at large airports is I guess very similiar the world over (or at least that is the theory) and the security at grass strips - well no existant - it is the same here and the same your side of the Pond in my experience at least,

6 In France they love GA, everyone comes out to enjoy watching the aircraft, in the UK I think there is pretty good acceptance spolied by a small group who cant understand that having purchased a house next to an airfield that there are aircraft. Strange bunch.

I prefer the USA. In Europe everything stops at 18-00 (if you are lucky) and doesnt start until at least 0800 (if you are very lucky). We are obsessed even more than you with Health and Safety and with providing as second rate service as we can. We live in or close to a big continent (almost as big as yours) but contrive to make the seamless integration of air transport as difficult as we can. Dont believe we lot are a federal state of Europe the divisions in Europe are about as big as they have ever been.

On the flip side we speak proper English on the radio, still know how to keep a stiff upper lip, and are not adverse to the odd Tally Ho or an occasional silk scarf old boy.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 15:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One would have to write reams to even begin to answer this usefully.
IO540 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 16:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ansião (PT)
Posts: 2,789
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
7. R/T would cover a ream of paper in itself. Just the most obvious: Altimeter 29.87 inches vs. QNH 1013. Much more folklore is available, and for increased entertainment there's plenty of regional differences within Europe (we are indeed VERY far from being one integral region!) including many places where only local language is used.
Jan Olieslagers is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 16:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plumpton Green
Age: 79
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
including many places where only local language is used.
... and that can mean 3 different languages in one country
patowalker is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 17:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The biggest things I hear from IFR pilots from the USA are

- the impenetrable Eurocontrol route validation system (which has basically put $ millions into the pockets of Jepp and other flight service providers, without achieving anything else because ATC do not operate it on the flight)

- the airport restrictions (opening hours, PPR, PNR Customs, etc)

- the often massive airport charges, with $800 being quite common with the big ones

Americans do face some of "our" issues on the very rare occassions they leave the US mainland. On US pilot forums they moan about hassle when flying to Canada, the Bahamas, etc. I think some 99% of US piston pilots don't ever leave US airspace.
IO540 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 19:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One would have to write reams to even begin to answer this usefully

In the US its your right to be able to fly

In the UK its a privilege to be able to fly

Just about sums it up.
Zulu Alpha is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 19:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sth Bucks UK
Age: 60
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The main advantage that flying in Europe offers is the fact that there are so many differences in geography, attitudes and cultures over relatively small distances.
It's this diversity that makes Europe such an interesting place, if a little challenging due to the increased beaurocracy that international borders offer.
If you want to go flying just so you can be at the controls of an aeroplane, the USA is better, but if you want to go flying so you can explore, Europe is unmatchable.
Nothing beats having breakfast in England, lunch in France and dinner in Switzerland!
stickandrudderman is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 20:03
  #11 (permalink)  
jxc
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 51
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing beats having breakfast in England, lunch in France and dinner in Switzerland!
That sounds great I am free in the morning
jxc is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 20:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Changing Times

If I had to answer this question a couple of years ago it would have been a definite US, by far, however, I have recently completed a couple of 'round robin' UK trips, and my perceptions may have changed.

Some of my trip was IFR, some VFR. Airfields in the trip include White Waltham, Dunkenswell, Perranporth, Sciliy Isles, Caernarvon, Haverford West.

Without exception I found a real welcome, good food, relatively cheap landing fees, parking, assistance for onward travel/stay, and everyone helpful - including transit ATC, airfield personnel, met facilities, et al. My view is that a lot of UK GA, is improving, modeling on US style GA airfields. The level of service is also rising, one could argue it might not have got any worse, however, the standard is high and getting higher.

The US is excellent, however, rising fuel may impact this, plus the NIMBY brigade chasing airfield closures, I last flew in the US last year, Los Angeles (Van Nuys), and noticed a slight downward movement in service, the flying however, was great.

I will be the first to bang on about regulation/maintenance/ATC issues, however, mu most recent trips have actually been very positive
maxred is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 20:42
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing beats having breakfast in England, lunch in France and dinner in Switzerland!
Now, if you had a proper plane like a TB20 you could have a late breakfast in England and an early lunch in Switzerland.

I think one can achieve the same geographic diversity in the USA as the above example, quite easily. Think of Bryce Canyon, Yosemite, Monument Valley, etc. The USA is not short of spectacular scenery.

What you won't quite get is the population diversity, perhaps, because they all speak English (more or less) and all are proud to be American (more or less).

Whether this matters is according to one's taste. How many pilots would trade the ability to just fly from a small (but H24) airfield in the UK to a small (but H24) airfield in Switzerland, Croatia, etc, without having to sod around with

- opening hours
- Customs
- avgas availability
- PPR
- PNR
- all kinds of other crap like duff airport contact numbers/emails

and be able to

- fly VFR up to 17999ft
- get easy CAS transits through all airspace
- have no Class A below 18000ft
- get a unified radar service all the way
- approx half the operating costs of European flying

I think most would prefer the USA

The daft thing is that Europe could also have most of the above - if there was a will to do it.

The biggest downside of the USA is the awful crap food which most people there eat. It is no wonder they are even bigger than modern-day Brits. Unless you live in certain places on the east or west coast, it is hard to find edible and healthy food. And you won't find it in any hotel, IME.
IO540 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 21:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am thinking of decent clean fresh fruit and veg. Nothing fancy. It's not easy to find.

Most restaurant food is relatively unhealthy - everywhere except Greece etc

When I was doing the IR in the USA (Phoenix) I cycled to a supermarket and bought a load of lettuce and tomatoes etc and made my own sandwiches for the day. All the food in restaurants there was stodgy crap. When I was on holidays there 20 years ago I used to gain a few kg in 3 weeks, just eating the hotel stuff. This is what I don't get about America; they are not stupid or poor but they drive themselves into an early grave by eating this stuff.
IO540 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2011, 21:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah but I bet they don't have a pensions crisis. I doubt their government really minds them eating crap.
thing is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2011, 01:15
  #16 (permalink)  

Life's too short for ironing
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scotland, & Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One thing you don't, or very rarely, get in the US is the aerial archeology.

I loved flying around at home of an early evening spotting where walls of old buildings or Roman camps had been. I miss not being able to see anything like that here in the US.
fernytickles is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2011, 07:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Age: 49
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by maxred
...I have recently completed a couple of 'round robin' UK trips...

...good food...
Do you -really- mean that? Food at UK airfields is, on the whole, mediocre at best and in many cases truly awful.
stevelup is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2011, 08:57
  #18 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you like Bacon Butties and the Full English, then British airfields are the best. However if you are after a salad, Buffalo Burger, Carne Asada or fried Scorpions (Santa Monica) then the USA is definitely better.

I would avoid the "Giant Burger" of Laughlin though, I once had one, and it was like a Big Mac the size of a dinner plate. The last half (that I couldn't eat) stank the Seneca out on the trip to Sedona.....

Topography of the western USA is unbeatable. Islands, mountains, high desert plains, desert, heat and snow....all in one day.
englishal is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2011, 22:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the ground for now.
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Generally truck stops in the US have excellent buffet type of food.
This thread is starting to make me hungry regardless of the kind of chow!
unmanned transport is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2011, 22:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the ground for now.
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being an expat for many years now, I love it here since I do not have to pay for a weather report, do not have to pay for navigation and landing fees etc. And relatively cheap fuel as well. I love to explore this big continent with lots of blue sky days in my Cessna.
unmanned transport is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.