Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

wake turbulence FAA question confusion

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

wake turbulence FAA question confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Apr 2011, 19:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wake turbulence FAA question confusion

My ground kit has the following question & answer in it:

"When departing behind a heavy aircraft, the pilot [of the smaller aircraft] should avoid wake turbulence by maneuvering the aircraft...above and upwind from the heavy aircraft."

OK, the above part I understand, that is obvious since wake vortices sink behind the generating aircraft. But how could I possibly position myself UPWIND of a departing aircraft? He is going to take off INTO the wind, like I am, and therefore I will be taking off DOWNWIND from him, correct? If he and I stopped dead in our tracks in the sky, and he blew smoke out his window, it's going to blow DOWNwind to me.

Perhaps I am not understanding this question correctly?

This is an explanation to the answer I found online:

"The proper procedure for departing behind a large aircraft is to rotate prior to the large aircraft's rotation point, then fly above and upwind of the large aircraft. Since vortices sink and drift downwind this should keep you clear."

Again, how do I get upwind of the heavy aircraft, without overtaking it?
Plasmech is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2011, 20:33
  #2 (permalink)  
jxc
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 51
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget the wind isn't always straight down the runway but a crosswind
jxc is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2011, 20:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The wind rarely blows exactly down the runway. If there is a crosswind, the wake turbulence will drift with it, therefore if you place yourself 'upwind' - into the crosswind - relative to the departing heavy's track, you increase your separation from the wake turbulence.

If you were to fly down crosswind, you might just run into the drifted vortex.

Make sense?
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2011, 20:46
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, OK, now that makes sense. If the wind IS down the runway, the question doesn't work (with the 3 multiple choice answers provided). But with a crosswind component, it makes sense. Thanks.
Plasmech is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2011, 21:34
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,618
Received 63 Likes on 44 Posts
I completely agree with the foregoing.

Add to that, that while fooling around with a buddy once, I deliberately entered his wake turbulance in cruise flight (both in 150's). It and it pretty well put me on my wingtip, despite all of my efforts to control. Do not blunder into wake turbulance! Learn where and when to expect it, and stay out.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2011, 21:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The other thing to add here is that even though your take-off roll will typically be shorter than a "heavy", you probably will not be able to outclimb him in the long run.

So if you can make a turn into the crosswind straight after take-off, so much the better. After all, most heavies will remain on the extended centerline for a few miles before making their first turn.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2011, 02:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,678
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Very much agree with the previous two replies.
There have been three wake turbulence accidents where I work. In each case it was in regard to a heavier departing a/c.

It is often difficult to predict where the vortices are/will be from a preceding departure. It is better to wait the 2/3/4 minutes than try to second guess them.

Avoiding landing vortices, however (in a headwind condition) is a piece of cake.
Tarq57 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.