Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Need help; T206 shopping

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Need help; T206 shopping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th April 2011 | 16:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Need help; T206 shopping

I am seeking some opinions on dollars vs hours; I am currently looking to purchase a T206 and have narrowed my search down 2.

-2005 T206 850TT w/tip tanks, 150hours STOH
-2006 T206 350TT w/WAAS

The one with 350TT is approximately 50k more. I am a VFR pilot who is going to get his IFR in this next plane. I am not sure is the extra 50K is worth lower time? Is WAAS going to be a great benefit? I would like to put SVT and active traffic in the bird when i get it, but with the 2006 I would not have the budget.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

thank you.
V8racing is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2011 | 16:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, USA
I think you should go with the higher time aircraft as it means it's been flown more. 350TT in 5 years isn't very much. It means that that engine most likely has been standing around with corrosive oil for longer than the other one. Granted, on such new engines it's less important, but still a factor.

When planes stand around more than they fly something always starts to go south.
AdamFrisch is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2011 | 17:01
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Sorry, I should have clarified. US FUNDS.
V8racing is offline  
Reply
Old 16th April 2011 | 17:23
  #4 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
I would not spend the extra money for the lower time, between these two aircraft. Perhaps there are other factors affecting the relative values?

The recent top overhaul sort of makes up for the higher time somewhat. That said, engine time is not as much an indicator of the life you can expect from the engine, as the actual condition of the engine.

As said, a very low utilization engine can be less good. 350 hours in 5 years is okay, as long as that time was spread evenly across that calendar period.
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2011 | 01:48
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Canadian Forces
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,658
Likes: 501
From: Canada
Are you hard over on buying a new build T206? A late 1970's to 1985 T206 will be less than half the cost, have what IMO is a better engine (Continental TSIO 520) and have a significantly better useful load. Find one with a Garmin 530/430 stack and you have all the avionics you need.

If you are set on a new build T206 than I second the notion about buying the cheaper one. Cessna has a SB to upgrade the early G1000 to WAAS and I see it has already had a top overhaul, something you will be paying for in the newer lower time one, in about 150 hrs

Last edited by Big Pistons Forever; 23rd April 2011 at 01:19.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2015 | 20:32
  #6 (permalink)  
huv
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
G1000 upgrade path

"Cessna has a SB to upgrade the early G1000 to WAAS ..."


Apologies for taking up an old thread, but the subject has become very relevant to me and two aircraft owners I know.


Is it indeed possible to upgrade early, i.e. pre-GFC700, G1000 to WAAS ??


I have found an SB about upgrading early G1000 with GFC700 to WAAS, but nothing about the ones with the KAP140.


I would also be interested to know if there is any way to upgrade pre-GFC700 G1000 to a GFC700-version. I suspect there is not, but I have a specific case with a WAAS GFC700-equipped plane being around 100.000 more expensive than a similar non-WAAS KAP140-equipped plane, so even if the upgrade path is expensive, it could be interesting.
huv is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.