OK : so what to buy next ?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK : so what to buy next ?
I'm going to change my aircraft, but really can't decide what to look at next. Currently, I fly a high-performance 300+HP complex single, which is very comortable with 4 big people and luggage etc at an average cruise of 160-170kt. It's been great : but the increasing cost of maintenance and avgas pricing (it's very thirsty) are making me wonder about looking at something more "sensible" (aaarrrggghhh - I hate that word!).
So : what do you recommend, dear readers ? I'd like something modern, fast-ish, IFR capable (I have an IR), and able to take 4 people. Something that runs on Jet A1 would be ideal, but I guess mogas would be OK - but absolute preference is for either a non-avgas mount, or at least something which doesn't burn anywhere near 18 gals/hour ! Complex/turbocharged/etc is fine, but so is something "simple" - this is a clean slate situation.
I keep hearing how the "new breed" of glass-cockpitted, sport planes are taking over. Anyone care to point me in a suitable direction ?
Thanks for your thoughts!
So : what do you recommend, dear readers ? I'd like something modern, fast-ish, IFR capable (I have an IR), and able to take 4 people. Something that runs on Jet A1 would be ideal, but I guess mogas would be OK - but absolute preference is for either a non-avgas mount, or at least something which doesn't burn anywhere near 18 gals/hour ! Complex/turbocharged/etc is fine, but so is something "simple" - this is a clean slate situation.
I keep hearing how the "new breed" of glass-cockpitted, sport planes are taking over. Anyone care to point me in a suitable direction ?
Thanks for your thoughts!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gt. Yarmouth, Norfolk
Age: 68
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to me that your IFR, load capacity and speed requirement limit you greatly. If you combine this with the word "modern" (a relative term in aviation as in everything) then even more so. Do you mean modern design or just modern edition of an old design? As regards the former you are probably limited to either Cirrus or Diamond and if your objective is cost cutting I would have thought a Diamond Jet A1 burner is all that is left (the problems with the Diamond diesels have been done to death on here). The latter might encompass a new or almost new C172/182 - there are a few diesel powered 172s for sale at the moment, I believe.
If I had the money and an IR (neither of which I do) then I might look at the Robin DR400 with the 2.0 diesel engine. Reviewed a few months ago in Flyer. There are questions over the long term availability of spares, which links in to the financial stability of the new company which is manufacturing the spares. There is one in the UK and a chat with the owner might help.
I don't think the "sports planes" will be what you want as almost all are 2 seater and limited on load, though the Vans RV10A four seater is for sale at around £110k at the moment (VFR only of course currently). Mogas would appear not to be suitable because of your IFR altitude requirements.
I think you are very limited and you need to consider the overall cost of down sizing, i.e. what is your current mount worth and what extra will you have to spend to buy something new(er) and cheaper to run. How much flying would that cost difference give you. The saving with a more modern aircraft may be illusory if you tie up a huge amount of your capital in a new, depreciating asset.
You have not told us how many hours a year you do nor where you want to go. That would help people in giving useful comment. I assume you are a long distance tourer - in Europe?
If I had the money and an IR (neither of which I do) then I might look at the Robin DR400 with the 2.0 diesel engine. Reviewed a few months ago in Flyer. There are questions over the long term availability of spares, which links in to the financial stability of the new company which is manufacturing the spares. There is one in the UK and a chat with the owner might help.
I don't think the "sports planes" will be what you want as almost all are 2 seater and limited on load, though the Vans RV10A four seater is for sale at around £110k at the moment (VFR only of course currently). Mogas would appear not to be suitable because of your IFR altitude requirements.
I think you are very limited and you need to consider the overall cost of down sizing, i.e. what is your current mount worth and what extra will you have to spend to buy something new(er) and cheaper to run. How much flying would that cost difference give you. The saving with a more modern aircraft may be illusory if you tie up a huge amount of your capital in a new, depreciating asset.
You have not told us how many hours a year you do nor where you want to go. That would help people in giving useful comment. I assume you are a long distance tourer - in Europe?
I would not think a DA40 would be terribly practical for 4 adults. With some luggage, and a sensible amount of fuel, it's hard enough getting 3 in.
Maybe a DA42? There's also the newly certified SMA Engine that can be installed in the 182, which is a combination that I would eventually like to own.
Maybe a DA42? There's also the newly certified SMA Engine that can be installed in the 182, which is a combination that I would eventually like to own.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not have a look at the new Tecnam twin which will run on mogas?
----------------------------------------
The P2006T all metal four-seater, has a useful load of 400 Kg, yet still only weighs in at 1,180 Kg MTOW. Powered by two Rotax four cylinder 912S engines of 100 hp each and turning constant speed propellers, it offers a cruise speed of 140 KTAS and a climb rate in excess of 1,100 feet per minute.
This light twin will cruise at 140 KTAS at 75% power to 145 kts with a fuel flow of 36 litres per hour. At 65% power it's just 28 litres per hour. That's the total for both engines!
--------------------------
Or a DR400 ecoflyer
“I keep hearing how the "new breed" of glass-cockpitted, sport planes are taking over. Anyone care to point me in a suitable direction ?”
Depending on your location I can take you up in one, but it is 2 seat and VFR only and costs about £55k. For that you get a 138kn machine which costs about £4000 a year all in to do 75hours. Great fun but not a serious IFR machine. 18.5lph of Mogas.
Rod1
----------------------------------------
The P2006T all metal four-seater, has a useful load of 400 Kg, yet still only weighs in at 1,180 Kg MTOW. Powered by two Rotax four cylinder 912S engines of 100 hp each and turning constant speed propellers, it offers a cruise speed of 140 KTAS and a climb rate in excess of 1,100 feet per minute.
This light twin will cruise at 140 KTAS at 75% power to 145 kts with a fuel flow of 36 litres per hour. At 65% power it's just 28 litres per hour. That's the total for both engines!
--------------------------
Or a DR400 ecoflyer
“I keep hearing how the "new breed" of glass-cockpitted, sport planes are taking over. Anyone care to point me in a suitable direction ?”
Depending on your location I can take you up in one, but it is 2 seat and VFR only and costs about £55k. For that you get a 138kn machine which costs about £4000 a year all in to do 75hours. Great fun but not a serious IFR machine. 18.5lph of Mogas.
Rod1
Last edited by Rod1; 24th Mar 2011 at 16:23.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or a DR400 ecoflyer
The DA40 TDI offers roughly the same performance on the same fuel burn. So it'll also fall short.
So if you want something that's more or less compatible with your current plane, the only plane I can think of is the DA42. And to be honest, I don't know what the load capacity of that aircraft is.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You didn't mention any budget, but if you have about 400k to spend, suggest you have a look at the SilverEagle (a modified C210). Here is a whole page of the birds. If I had the dosh (which, sadly, I don't...), that'll probably be my choice.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 433 Likes
on
228 Posts
MOGAS and IFR don't mix well because the CAA imposed aircraft altitude limit is 6,000ft.
See section 3:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/ga_srg_09webSSL04.pdf
See section 3:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/ga_srg_09webSSL04.pdf
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you want old tec and simple then a DR400 180 is the best of the fix gear fix prop machine. You get IFR and full 4 seat cap at 135kn with 180 hp lyk up front. This is however going to have the same fuel burn as the Tecnam for less speed and less redundancy. If you want to change the game you need JetA1 or a Rotax.
Rod1
Rod1
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Second the Tecnam - If I had the money I'd go for that twin. It's not as fast as your previous thing, but it's fast enough, cheap to operate, burns less gas on 2 engines than most do on one etc and it has the added nerve calming effect of a twin.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think that the useful load of the tecnam 2006 is actually 400kg, once you have the full avionics suite on board, let alone an autopilot. It looks like an agonisingly great piece of kit, which just won't do the trick of lifting four adults, luggage and 3hours fuel plus VFR reserve fuel. Unless, of course, they are more modestly upholstered than I am.
Smarthawke know far more about this than I will ever will and can give you chapter and verse....
In the meantime, how about easing back on the throttle of what you currently fly? Suddenly, it'll become much more economical! I speak as someone who owns a 300hp IFR, complex, machine.
Smarthawke know far more about this than I will ever will and can give you chapter and verse....
In the meantime, how about easing back on the throttle of what you currently fly? Suddenly, it'll become much more economical! I speak as someone who owns a 300hp IFR, complex, machine.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the Tecnam is a big leap forward. It runs on fuel, which is 40% cheaper than avgas and is available, with a little imagination, almost any ware. In the UK having a spare engine is a huge advantage. In my young bold days I would fly straight across the North sea single engine no problem, these days I fly round which is much further. Given a 140kn Twin many direct options are possible, which would not be a good idea in a single. The days of the old Lyk 300hp avgas only engines are numbered in Europe. The next step up from the Tecnam is already in development and will give the same fuel burn on the same engines but lift 4 X 85kg people plus bags over 1000miles at 175kn. In Europe these new airframes are being designed around 2 Rotax machines, not a single Lyk.
Rod1
Rod1
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have a look at Grumman Tigers (made by American General post 1992) - I think they strike an excellent balance between speed and complexity.
It'll reliably cruise at 130kts (sometimes a bit more) on 10 US gallons per hour (AVGAS though) but it has a fixed prop and gear which really cuts down on the maintenance bills. I have flown to the same destinations as friends in Arrows and, leaving at the same time, we generally arrive at the same time.
Great planes to fly and very responsive.
The Archer is another alternative - slightly slower than the Tiger but better overall availability of parts and slightly better useful load.
It'll reliably cruise at 130kts (sometimes a bit more) on 10 US gallons per hour (AVGAS though) but it has a fixed prop and gear which really cuts down on the maintenance bills. I have flown to the same destinations as friends in Arrows and, leaving at the same time, we generally arrive at the same time.
Great planes to fly and very responsive.
The Archer is another alternative - slightly slower than the Tiger but better overall availability of parts and slightly better useful load.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fly a high-performance 300+HP complex single, which is very comortable with 4 big people and luggage etc at an average cruise of 160-170kt. It's been great : but the increasing cost of maintenance and avgas pricing (it's very thirsty) are making me wonder about looking at something more "sensible" (aaarrrggghhh - I hate that word!).
If you are feeling extra flush, a TBM850 will haul a larger number of obese British teenagers
If you can't afford to fly your SR22, hmmm... you need to re-examine your mission profile.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you can't afford to fly your SR22, hmmm... you need to re-examine your mission profile.
Now now, IO, no fishing - I don't fly a Cirrus. But since you're on, someone suggested I should look at a TB-20GT - what say you to that ?Thanks for the advice so far, guys - I obviously am aware of much of this stuff, but I guess I'm hoping someone will come up with an angle I haven't considered yet !
HJ
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a TB20GT owner since 2002, over 1k+ airborne hours, of course I would recommend it highly
But can't say it will be significantly cheaper than what you had previously - unless you rely on a 2002 GT having an airframe in good nick whereas your current plane is some old heap, in which case yes you will save substantial "unscheduled maintenance" expenditure.
I flew back from Switzerland this morning and the refill came to ~ £300. There isn't any way to do much about that, and fuel will dominate piston GA flying today (and a PA28-XXX will do much the same MPG as a correctly operated IO540 or similar engine). So you don't same significant money by going down to less capable hardware, as long as you remain in the SEP scene. Unless you fly an old heap in which case "unscheduled maintenance" expenditure may well dominate.
There is no free lunch.
A good late model TB20GT will set you back the best part of £150k.
But can't say it will be significantly cheaper than what you had previously - unless you rely on a 2002 GT having an airframe in good nick whereas your current plane is some old heap, in which case yes you will save substantial "unscheduled maintenance" expenditure.
I flew back from Switzerland this morning and the refill came to ~ £300. There isn't any way to do much about that, and fuel will dominate piston GA flying today (and a PA28-XXX will do much the same MPG as a correctly operated IO540 or similar engine). So you don't same significant money by going down to less capable hardware, as long as you remain in the SEP scene. Unless you fly an old heap in which case "unscheduled maintenance" expenditure may well dominate.
There is no free lunch.
A good late model TB20GT will set you back the best part of £150k.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think there is a real answer. We are now paying the price of pandering to Naderism/Consumer Power/Lawyers. It hasn't been worthwhile for any manufacturer to develop a modern, efficient four seater IFR aircraft so we don't have any. The aircraft you have at the moment is probably the best you'll get. As for the future, there won't be one until the last greedy scumbag compo lawyer stops breathing.
PM
PM
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Someone call?!
Without wanting to sound like a salesman (I'm an engineer), the P2006T is a very capable machine.
I talked to someone who had a lot of hours in an SR20 and in his opinion the P2006T was very similar in performance/load etc to an SR20 - in fact slightly better on useful load. And of course the Tecnam's off-tarmac strip performance is much, much better than an SR20.
In the next few months, the P2006T MTOW should get an increase from 1180kg to 1230kg - no airframe/engine mods, a paperwork exercise (similar to that for Mooneys in the past).
The P2006T is IFR certified and certified to run on either EN228 spec Mogas (up to 10% ethanol) or 100LL. If you run > 30% Avgas then you change oil filter and sparkplugs twice as often. 3 litres of oil per engine, < £4/sparkplug...
We have 250 hrs on our demo machine since last June - in demo, MEP training/renewal, IR renewals and private hire roles.
For those that are allergic to glass, then you can have analogue instruments. For those that don't like fold up wheels then a fixed gear version is available - gain around 20kg of useful load, lose about 6 kts.
Yes, it's the ideal twin for the training market but also as a private owner's mount. The first UK private machine should arrive next month.
It is FAA certified and probably the only thing that might hold it back in the USA is a strange distrust of the mighty Rotax 912 - oh and it doesn't have a parachute and isn't owned by a Chinese company....!
Hugh J - if you're anywhere near Wycombe Air Park sometime then call in and have a look (you might want to call first or PM me as it is in the air most days) - I'm more than happy to give you a guided tour.
Without wanting to sound like a salesman (I'm an engineer), the P2006T is a very capable machine.
I talked to someone who had a lot of hours in an SR20 and in his opinion the P2006T was very similar in performance/load etc to an SR20 - in fact slightly better on useful load. And of course the Tecnam's off-tarmac strip performance is much, much better than an SR20.
In the next few months, the P2006T MTOW should get an increase from 1180kg to 1230kg - no airframe/engine mods, a paperwork exercise (similar to that for Mooneys in the past).
The P2006T is IFR certified and certified to run on either EN228 spec Mogas (up to 10% ethanol) or 100LL. If you run > 30% Avgas then you change oil filter and sparkplugs twice as often. 3 litres of oil per engine, < £4/sparkplug...
We have 250 hrs on our demo machine since last June - in demo, MEP training/renewal, IR renewals and private hire roles.
For those that are allergic to glass, then you can have analogue instruments. For those that don't like fold up wheels then a fixed gear version is available - gain around 20kg of useful load, lose about 6 kts.
Yes, it's the ideal twin for the training market but also as a private owner's mount. The first UK private machine should arrive next month.
It is FAA certified and probably the only thing that might hold it back in the USA is a strange distrust of the mighty Rotax 912 - oh and it doesn't have a parachute and isn't owned by a Chinese company....!
Hugh J - if you're anywhere near Wycombe Air Park sometime then call in and have a look (you might want to call first or PM me as it is in the air most days) - I'm more than happy to give you a guided tour.