Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Would you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd December 2010 | 14:27
  #1 (permalink)  
JHO
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Differing
Would you?

If the worst happened and there was a quiet 3 carriage way road below would you land on it? would you be more inclined to if you knew the road and were aware that there were no carriage way lights or pylons to hit.
JHO is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 14:56
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Definitely.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 14:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
Depends on the surrounding terrain I guess. Sometimes you don't have a choice. But I would prefer an unobstructed field over a road - there's too many things on the side of the road that are too small to see from the air, yet substantial enough to ruin your day.
BackPacker is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 15:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 2
From: Oxford, UK
Ask that chap who landed on the road near Wellesbourne - last week, was it?

Answer to the question: we usually land in fields. However, if in Texas, or Florida, land on the road! Reason? Texas fields are, in West Texas, full of rocks and cacti, in East Texas, likely to be a swamp. In Florida, either orange groves, shopping centres, or the Everglades - swamped again!

But in the UK, plenty of suitable fields....depends on the glide ratio, of course.
mary meagher is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 15:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: USA
or the Everglades - swamped again!
And if you end up in the swamps, there are plenty of crocs lurking beneath!
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 15:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Surrey UK/Quebec CA
As long as it wasnt in the congestion charge zone.
PilotPieces is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 15:43
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 64
From: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Nah - I'd just pee into an empty water bottle, and continue to my destination.
Runaway Gun is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 16:16
  #8 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,089
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
Yup, I have many times.

You HAVE to know the area though, or the surprise could be very dangerous and expensive. The safety of those "innocent" citizens on the ground is very much your responsibility. Let alone the risk of actually hitting someone, the simpl risk of them having an accident 'cause they were watching you do something unusual, is still your moral responsibility.

The authories may take an interest, so plan how you'll deal with that. If that aircraft is not one you own, also think about what you'll tell the owner! If you miss (or indeed - hit) something, and do damage, your insurance company might find a awy out of paying a claim. If you're breaking an air regulation (or other reg) by landing, the clause which probably says if you're breaking an air reg, you're no longer insured, will probably come into effect. Can you afford the damage yourself?
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 16:34
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
In the UK, I have not heard of any legal reason for avoiding a road. There was a pilot forum tale that the CAA pull your license after that but that is false.

I guess lighting and other overhead stuff are the real problem. On a single or a dual carriageway, the distance between the lights is not all that much more than the typical wingspan (10m) and if you hit anything you will probably lose control but you won't be low enough yet at that point in time.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd December 2010 | 23:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
If the worst happened and there was a quiet 3 carriage way road below
I have heard it argued that it doesn't really matter whether the road is quiet.
The thinking is that in the case of a motorway, touchdown speeds will be similar to vehicle speeds. As you swoop down to land, traffic approaching behind you (as well as being somewhat surprised) will naturally brake, whilst traffic already in front will in any event be accelerating away from you, either oblivious to your presence, or with alarm at the sight in their rear view mirror.
flybymike is offline  
Reply
Old 24th December 2010 | 16:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire
At night it is your only real option and I would not think twice!
liam548 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.