Renting Cessna over Xmas for flying abroad?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Renting Cessna over Xmas for flying abroad?
So I was toying with the idea of renting an aircraft over Xmas to fly home to Sweden in. I'd need it from around the 20th to the 1st of Jan. I tried my local club, but they won't allow it to be gone for that long plus it doesn't have Mode S. I mostly fly Cessna 150/152's and 172's.
What would the implications be insurance-wise? Is it at all feasible? Any ideas welcome.
What would the implications be insurance-wise? Is it at all feasible? Any ideas welcome.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be VFR. But I have time on my side. 4 days, in fact.
I don't think I have the time to learn a new type like the Grumman. And it's been 15 years since I flew PA28's. As stubborn as it sounds, I am also very much a high wing man.
I don't think I have the time to learn a new type like the Grumman. And it's been 15 years since I flew PA28's. As stubborn as it sounds, I am also very much a high wing man.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you're going to be needing it for about 12 days. How many hours are you going to put on it?
Most clubs have minimum hours per day requirements because they did not acquire those aircraft to be sitting idle at a foreign ramp all day.
Most clubs have minimum hours per day requirements because they did not acquire those aircraft to be sitting idle at a foreign ramp all day.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just for your info the AA5 is a doddle to fly and you'd just need a check out by a friendly CRI to be signed off for it (who doesn't charge). Can't help with a Cessna though I am afraid but if you get stuck you may want to consider the AA5. It is owned by a maintenance organisation and used as their "air taxi" to ferry customers home so I don't anticipate a problem taking it away for a number of days over xmas and I shouldn't think they will sting you for minimum hours flown.
Rgds
Rgds
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, I think I'll be putting roughly 20hrs on it, maybe a bit more. I'm willing to pay for a sensible daily mimina.
It'd be the UK, via Netherlands, Germany, Denmark up to Örebro (which is halfway between Gothenburg and Stockholm). Then Christmas. Then Örebro to Stockholm. And then back all the way.
Thanks englishal - I'll keep that in mind.
It'd be the UK, via Netherlands, Germany, Denmark up to Örebro (which is halfway between Gothenburg and Stockholm). Then Christmas. Then Örebro to Stockholm. And then back all the way.
Thanks englishal - I'll keep that in mind.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PA28
Or my newl 160hp engined PA28, fresh out of overhaul with a new ARC? Tidy workhorse.
Don't think you need a CRI to do a check-out, I'm pretty sure I could show you the ropes or have FI mates who'll do it for free if that would make you feel more comfortable.
Nice a/c - no mode S - why would you want one if travelling to Scandi-hooliga on a G reg?
Stik
Don't think you need a CRI to do a check-out, I'm pretty sure I could show you the ropes or have FI mates who'll do it for free if that would make you feel more comfortable.
Nice a/c - no mode S - why would you want one if travelling to Scandi-hooliga on a G reg?
Stik
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I seem to remember there's a Dutch requirement to have Mode S to fly above 1200ft AGL in controlled airspace. In reality, I've heard no one is really that bothered so it's not a deal breaker.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I seem to remember there's a Dutch requirement to have Mode S to fly above 1200ft AGL in controlled airspace.
On the other hand if you're just transiting Holland on your way to Scandinavia it's perfectly feasible and safe to do so at 1000' MSL, remaining outside controlled airspace all the way, so indeed it should not be a deal breaker.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could you get exemption and fly higher or in controlled airspace with A or C XPDR if you ask ATC?
Sidenote: didn't the airspace around Schiphol demand Mode S to be turned off as it cluttered the screens? If so, then I assume I could get transit there with a Mode C only?
Sidenote: didn't the airspace around Schiphol demand Mode S to be turned off as it cluttered the screens? If so, then I assume I could get transit there with a Mode C only?
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 57
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, as I recall pretty soon after they made everybody fit use mode S, they had to make all the VFR aircraft under the TMA turn them off again 
So now it's a case of, it's mandatory to have mode S fitted, but it must not be operated, don't you just love 'em.
So now it's a case of, it's mandatory to have mode S fitted, but it must not be operated, don't you just love 'em.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could you get exemption and fly higher or in controlled airspace with A or C XPDR if you ask ATC?
In practice, what I've heard is that most controllers prefer that you use mode A/C instead of nothing if you don't have mode S. But it also depends on the airspace and altitude you're talking about, how busy it is, and the mood of the controller on that day.
Without mode-S, my primary plan would be to stay in class G below 1200' all the way, with the transponder turned off. You can then talk to ATC and see if they're willing to allow you higher and to use the transponder. But honestly, transiting Holland at 1000' is not an issue at all. In fact, lots of places where 1000' MSL is actually more than 1000' AGL...
Yes, as I recall pretty soon after they made everybody fit use mode S, they had to make all the VFR aircraft under the TMA turn them off again
For those who don't recall the situation: Mode-S became mandatory somewhere in the middle of winter, so everybody had transponders fitted over the winter period. The first glorious day of spring, everybody decided to go flying - with their new mode-S transponder activated. This generated so many returns on the radar scopes, with so many data blocks associated with them, that the controllers simply could not distinguish their own traffic from the rest of the clutter anymore. This was particularly bad in the area around the PAM VOR, which is a choke point at low level for GA, but also a major waypoint for approaching and transiting IFR traffic.
So a NOTAM was hastily put together which essentially told everyone to turn their newly acquired transponder OFF in certain areas. That situation remained for, what, six months? That was the time it took for ATC to update their software and implement much better filtering options.
And still if Dutch Mil is doing maintenance on their radar systems and have to fall back to their backup sets, we are again being told to turn our transponders off in certain areas. Shame, really.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamFrisch
I think I'll be putting roughly 20hrs on it, maybe a bit more. I'm willing to pay for a sensible daily mimina. It'd be the UK, via Netherlands, Germany, Denmark up to Örebro (which is halfway between Gothenburg and Stockholm). Then Christmas. Then Örebro to Stockholm
Last time I came back from Skåvsta I routed Malmö - Groningen - Calais - Hampshire, which was all very GA friendly, low-level over NL (...not difficult!), piece of cake, a good day's flying.
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hate to put the mockers on all this and I have no idea of your competence and confidence, but my personal assessment of my own likelihood to make this flight successfully, VFR, out of icing conditions, on pre arranged dates at this time of year in these latitudes, in the present horrendous weather patterns is precisely Zilch, zero, nil, nada...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the offers. Seems like I might have found a C182 out of Blackbushe if we can make it all work in time.
Flybymike - it can certainly be risky, no doubt. But staying out of moisture and clouds is paramount in freezing conditions. The cold clear air in itself carries no higher risk of icing than warmer air. That's why it's important to have time so one can turn around or fly around any kind of trouble.
I don't take it lightly. I've asked myself if this is a good idea at all. But I don't want to just be a CAVOK, clear sky, summer flier only. I don't think it advances ones skills. I've convinced myself that it's important to be out in the elements sometimes and have to make decisions and judgements.
Flybymike - it can certainly be risky, no doubt. But staying out of moisture and clouds is paramount in freezing conditions. The cold clear air in itself carries no higher risk of icing than warmer air. That's why it's important to have time so one can turn around or fly around any kind of trouble.
I don't take it lightly. I've asked myself if this is a good idea at all. But I don't want to just be a CAVOK, clear sky, summer flier only. I don't think it advances ones skills. I've convinced myself that it's important to be out in the elements sometimes and have to make decisions and judgements.
Last edited by AdamFrisch; 15th Dec 2010 at 02:03.
