Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

CTAF - Aussie Airspace

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

CTAF - Aussie Airspace

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2010, 23:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CTAF - Aussie Airspace

Ok, A CTAF question this time.

Would you say it's good practice to give a CTAF transiting call when flying over a CTAF enroute to somewhere else. I don't be believe there are any mandated calls in this regard but I'm interested in your opinions
flyingpom is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2010, 00:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd say it depends on your overfly altitude. If you're several thousand field above the field, there's no point. However, if you're only 1000-2000 above, then it would probably be good practice to, particularly if there are any larger aircraft around using a 1500' circuit height.
Steve888 is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2010, 08:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From memory the wording in the regs says something to the effect of 'should make appropriate calls if you're likely to bother the traffic in the CTAF'. Helpfully though there's no height limit to the CTAF. I'm fairly sure that the folks overflying in the flight levels don't bother talking to every CTAF.. so practically my approach is if more than 2000-3000 above, don't bother.

However, if the CTAF takes RPT/faster traffic, (Mt Gambier for example), I tend to make sure I have the CTAF on Box 2 at least, and think about where their approach path might be - i.e. am I likely to come into conflict with them (possibly well outside normal CTAF limits), and if so, talk to them.

To answer your other question, I tend to prefer altitude changes to maintain VMC for the simple reason it makes the nav easier than putting in doglegs. That is, unless there's some reason why not, like a few thousand tons of rock in the way, or lacking outlanding options.

Last edited by Mark1234; 21st Oct 2010 at 08:55.
Mark1234 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.