Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Important explanation from the European Commission to my letter

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Important explanation from the European Commission to my letter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Oct 2010, 17:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For clarity,

Random drug testing IS legal in the US, and IS a requirement for a range of commercial operations (I believe, including maintenance operations). So it is not that 'unreasonable' that some congressman will get in a twist about the 'lesser' safety of European regulations (not withstanding there is no evidence of a problem - after all Europe does not have a monopoly on solving non-problems). I believe the twice yearly inspection is an increase and that it was a protectionist action.

The bigger issues must be around airline ownership and a very different view in Europe vs. the US with regard to monopolies (hence Europe's desire to allow long term immunity from prosecution and America wanting this immunity to fall away quickly).
mm_flynn is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 18:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have worked for 2 companys in the UK that do random drugs testing.

Pee in a pot and a hair clipping.

Story goes a offshore worker to hide his hobby in Amsterdam shaves his head in the belief that that will foil the drugs tester. Should have got a crack and sack though as they took a clipping from there instead.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 20:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair enough; is drug testing an issue in the EU then?

If the EU objects to it, that is tantamount to enabling drunk/drugged workers to perform maintenance on US registered passenger jets, which looks pretty bad form for the EU to be defending

Next time you take a flight on say Continental Airlines, the aircraft may have been maintained by some EU based Repair Station whose employees have been protected from drug testing by EU law.

Does the EU really want that? It would make the evening news.
IO540 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 20:58
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You sure you lot arent taking the pi**

Seriously, what has the world come to.

I can think of so many ways an engineer might perform his work badly and so many reasons why radomn drug tests wouldnt make any difference.

What next. Shall we drug test lawyers, accountants, politicians perhaps.

It really is time this nonesense must stop - not least because we cant afford it any more!

anyway, sorry to depart from the discussion, I know it probably will not (stop) but had to vent my view.

Chaps, back to the discussion.

Last edited by Fuji Abound; 20th Oct 2010 at 07:34.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 21:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we could do with getting some of the folk at EASA drug tested.
julian_storey is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 21:16
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

I can think of so many ways an engineer might perform his work badly
Part M makes dodgy maintenance impossible.
IO540 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2010, 21:19
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: now in Zomerset
Age: 62
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolutely. And if there is a maintenance-related incident, then the owner is responsible
peter272 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 07:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Part M makes dodgy maintenance impossible.
Nice to see a sense of humour creeping into the thread.....
Fitter2 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2010, 12:10
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I vote for regular and thorough drug testing of the entire staff of the Dutch CAA, in the light of some of the bizarre and thoroughly baffling legislation that they have produced concerning PLB's, Mode-S transponders and the overflight of bird reserves.

It all suggests that they have been loafing around in cafe's, getting skunked to the eyeballs.

YouTube - Police in Amsterdam - Harry Enfield and Chums - BBC comedy
wsmempson is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2010, 18:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks like it simply hinges on the color of the House. Republican and you'll be able to keep doing what you've always been doing, Democrat and you'll be looking for a new licence...
Oberstar out after 36 years
bookworm is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2010, 19:31
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Londonderry
Age: 57
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rejoice! :d:d
noblue is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.