Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Thorpe group forming in SE UK

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Thorpe group forming in SE UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2001, 00:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Thorpe group forming in SE UK

The T211 is a sweet lil' low-wing aeroplane with performance comparable to a Cessna 152.

If I've got it right, these groups are sponsored by the manufacturers and as a result the fees are low and utterly predictable: £5 per hour dry, £55 per month, £500 membership (which can be sold on if you leave).

Some local pilots are wanting to start a group and we need 5 of us to show a commitment for the a/c to be allocated to us. We've got 3.5 so far....

There is a decision to be made about where it will be based, but for my part I want it to be at Rochester (cheap a/c parking, free landings, out-of-hours flying).

Other possible bases are Biggin or Redhill.


I've been waiting for a chance like this since gaining my PPL last August - if we can rustle up a couple more members we could be flying cheaply in a matter of weeks!!!

Interested? Call me on 07970 794294


SteveR

ps. I think I've heard most of the stories, good and bad, about Thorpe groups - but I'm happy to see 'em repeated here.
SteveR is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2001, 15:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The fairy tale Land of Uk
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

You can check out the Thorp Club website here:- http://www.ad-holdings.co.uk/thorp/
Yogi-Bear is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2001, 16:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for the URL - I'd mislaid it. It's a pity the site isn't particularly fresh...

OK, I invited gossip and comment re: Thorp groups - here's some I've collected. (This is hearsay and anecdote - advance apologies if I've got summat wrong, I'm simply passing on what I've heard and if I hear different I'll happily pass that on too).


The aircraft I'm hoping to get involved with is the one that was at White Waltham. The group at WW has collapsed in acrimony I believe, because the a/c suffered a shock loaded engine and damaged prop tips - and the responsible individual cannot be identified ?!?!?!

I find this so hard to understand.

Apparently it's one of 2 possible members and neither will admit it (the £750 insurance excess may be the root of this).

How there can be no documentary trail defeats me - or is somebody claiming that they missed damaged prop tips before flying it?

The T211 has a very fragile nose-wheel. Apparently, so fragile that the Liverpool group now never land with any flap - this is to ensure a nose-up attitude on final, and to ensure that the elevator has enough effect to get the nose skywards during the flare.

Visibility during final ain't a problem - the Liverpool member who showed me the plane took particular trouble to get me acquainted with the cowling picture during the climb because you can still see so many fields with climb attitude set (there was a strong tendency for this Cessna jockey to set more nose up and then watch the speed decay rapidly).


Steve R
SteveR is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2001, 00:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Steve R1.

Wow - one minute it was, well I'll pop over to Biggin and view

and now it's

Buy, Buy, Buy


Less flippantly though, if the aircraft has a history of a less than totally robust nosewheel, do you really think that 34 at Rochester would be at all suitable? I have found it one of the bumpiest strips in my experience.

Stik
stiknruda is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2001, 01:12
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dorchester, Dorset
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Stik: You have a good point. Trouble is, with only 4 or 5 on the register, it's kinda difficult to base glass-nosewheel opinions on statistics. Where did the perception of this trait come from?

Also, it's not got a stall warner and the fuel consumption according to the Liverpool group's spreadsheet is nearer 26 litres per hour than 22 - both things which lessen my ardour.

Anyway, it's probably all academic really. It seems that I've got a one-in-two chance of being jobless soon, not one-in-five as I at first thought.....

SteveR1 (what a good handle - should've chosen it myself)
SteveR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.