Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

FlymapLD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th June 2010 | 22:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 1
From: Sth Bucks UK
FlymapLD

Looks like a nice piece of kit. Anyone got any comments based on first hand experience?
stickandrudderman is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2010 | 07:10
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 178
From: UK
I don't know if they've changed the software much, but I made the error of buying a GPS PDA with pocket flymap some years ago, and have been very unimpressed.

The user interface is often counter intuitive with some significant bugs (such as the failure to consistently find the nearest airfield) and the linkage with flymap win (the packaged PC planning package) is erratic at best.

The availability of chart updates was very poor, although I understand that the new supplier have sorted that.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2010 | 16:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Expensive when compared to other offerings. If price not a huge concern, you should be looking at the Garmin G3X first.
Stik is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2010 | 19:08
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 1
From: Sth Bucks UK
Thanks for the replies.
I'm struggling to find anyone who can give me clear and unbiased data (layman's) on the pros and cons of the various devices available.
The Flymap LD appeals because:
It's european, not american, so with the exception of Garmin perhaps, I'm more confident that the design is more aligned with the european LAA flight envelope and I'm likely to get more immediate support in the event of a problem.
Build quality seems good.
It has dual screens and therefore built in redundancy (AIUI)
It's light. (2.7kg)
It's bright.
Dimensions are in keeping with the remit.
It has a touch screen. (This may actually be a disadvantage in years to come once the screen is old I suppose)
I quite like the USB port instead of a data card port, I don't really know why.
It can incorporate just about all of the functions I desire in the one unit, including AOA and turn and slip, not to mention the moving map (with european data)
I'm not really bothered by synthetic vision, I have windows in my aeroplane....
probably lots of other things I should consider....
stickandrudderman is offline  
Reply
Old 1st July 2010 | 10:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 760
Likes: 411
From: not where I want to be
I'm not really bothered by synthetic vision, I have windows in my aeroplane....
What!! I wouldn't brag about that, what if it crashes, or you get the blue screen of death or something



P.
First_Principal is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.