Which aircraft (not) to fly for tall persons?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the low lands
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which aircraft (not) to fly for tall persons?
Since today I only flew C172's. Today I was at the Aero expo in Wycombe and sat in a Da-40 for the first time. I always wanted to fly in one. Unfortulately I didn't fit, since I am to tall for the aircraft. I was very disappointed.
Which aircraft can I (not) fly? My lenght is 1.91m (6 feet, 3 inch; which is not out of the ordinary in the Netherlands).
Thanks for your help.
Which aircraft can I (not) fly? My lenght is 1.91m (6 feet, 3 inch; which is not out of the ordinary in the Netherlands).
Thanks for your help.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hellfire Corner
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You will get in a Rans S6; it was designed by a very tall chap in America. Whiskey Kilo Wanderer may be along soon to confirm that.
Last edited by ChampChump; 27th Jun 2010 at 20:20. Reason: Typo
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
1m92 - other Cessnas fit as well, including 152 and 206/207.
Flew a PA28 for an hour once upon a long time ago, don't remember any height problem.
Also didn't have a problem sitting in a PA12 - the difficulty was getting into it in a hurry whilst it was drifting away from the jetty towards something expensive, and getting out of it in a hurry when approaching the jetty again. Someone shorter would have had less folding and unfolding and complicated real-time 3D mental arithmetic to do.
And there's plenty of room in a Beaver.
Flew a PA28 for an hour once upon a long time ago, don't remember any height problem.
Also didn't have a problem sitting in a PA12 - the difficulty was getting into it in a hurry whilst it was drifting away from the jetty towards something expensive, and getting out of it in a hurry when approaching the jetty again. Someone shorter would have had less folding and unfolding and complicated real-time 3D mental arithmetic to do.
And there's plenty of room in a Beaver.
A little less conversation,
a little more aviation...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bracknell, UK
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the "NOT" category, I suspect the DH Heron or Dove would be out of the question - I remember trying to wedge myself into the left-hand seat of a Heron, it appeared to have been designed for munchkins - I then looked round, to see The Gorrilla (simian of this parish) with his shoulders wedged in the door to the flight deck - getting into the seat wasn't going to be a problem for him, because he couldn't even make it onto the flight deck.
Is this genetic? - those with heads the highest above mean sea level (always a factor in the Netherlands) have an additional innate advantage of those of a more stumpy disposition?
Is this genetic? - those with heads the highest above mean sea level (always a factor in the Netherlands) have an additional innate advantage of those of a more stumpy disposition?
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: scotland
Age: 48
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm 6 foot 6 tall and I learned to fly in a Robinson R22 but I have since got my rating in the R44 which is alot more roomy. The 22 was quite a tight fit but for some reason I didn't find it to be a problem I even had an instructor who was about 6'2 and we both used to get into the R22 and someone else had to put a ratchet strap around the doors to stop us from bursting out of it. 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im 6'3" and PA28's are just fine, i have flown almost all the variants, T67C slingsby and surprisingly the DA20 were both ok, you do sometimes clatter the stick on your knees.
One i was hugely surprised about was the new PA32, Shiny glass cockpit, roomy rear passenger area, i cant fly it because im too big. Well ok yes i could fly it but i couldnt get my heels on the floor so it was the choice of rudder OR Diff brakes. There was a stupid armrest built into the cabin which pushes my knee into the yoke and my head was always at a sideways angle. Very dissapointed.
DBB
One i was hugely surprised about was the new PA32, Shiny glass cockpit, roomy rear passenger area, i cant fly it because im too big. Well ok yes i could fly it but i couldnt get my heels on the floor so it was the choice of rudder OR Diff brakes. There was a stupid armrest built into the cabin which pushes my knee into the yoke and my head was always at a sideways angle. Very dissapointed.
DBB
BIGFLYINGROB is much taller than you, and fits into his Auster easily.
When I used to have a PA28 share, tall people never seemed to struggle.
In the microlight world, most aeroplanes are reasonably tall-person-friendly, but you could for example try a Sky Ranger for a nice to fly big cockpit.
(Me, I use a booster cushion in most aeroplanes
)
G
When I used to have a PA28 share, tall people never seemed to struggle.
In the microlight world, most aeroplanes are reasonably tall-person-friendly, but you could for example try a Sky Ranger for a nice to fly big cockpit.
(Me, I use a booster cushion in most aeroplanes
)G
The Original Whirly
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And me, I use a booster cushion (or two) in all aeroplanes. 
But there are some helicopters, including oldish ones like the Alouette and Gazelle, which have movable pedals and seats and adjust for all sizes of people. They're wonderful! But why can't all aircraft do it?
But there are some helicopters, including oldish ones like the Alouette and Gazelle, which have movable pedals and seats and adjust for all sizes of people. They're wonderful! But why can't all aircraft do it?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Robin DR400s are OK for length, but the seat doesn't just slide back but also rotates backwards at its furthest aft setting. This leads to a very uncomfortable seating position when you're 1.86m (like I am) or taller. It's OK for legs up to two hours, but no longer than that.
In contrast, I find the DA40 very comfortable for my length. Have to adjust the rudder pedals to the most forward setting of course, but there's plenty space then. At least five cm above my head so I don't know why you didn't fit.
The DA40 does have the problem with the stick being up there in your crotch, plus the rather substantial center console, so there's not a lot of room for kneeboards and stuff. You really have to organize all your paperwork far better than in, say, a PA28 where you can spread it all out in your lap.
In contrast, I find the DA40 very comfortable for my length. Have to adjust the rudder pedals to the most forward setting of course, but there's plenty space then. At least five cm above my head so I don't know why you didn't fit.
The DA40 does have the problem with the stick being up there in your crotch, plus the rather substantial center console, so there's not a lot of room for kneeboards and stuff. You really have to organize all your paperwork far better than in, say, a PA28 where you can spread it all out in your lap.
As someone who has always had height problems in aircraft your overall height is not the issue. People are proportioned differently. Two people of 6ft 3 inches could have a range of sitting heights that vary by as much as 5 inches. Lets face it we don't buy trousers based on our height, we use leg length. Seating is a function of back length.
You will find that you can get into more aircraft than you think, but it may not be comfortable for a long period. The most important issue is can you get free control movement and can you get out if you have to. The DA20 has more headroom than a DA40 or 42 probably because it has cheaper (thinner) seats. When the seat raising mechanism on a PA28 fails it is frequently rigged in the up position making it impossible for some of us to get in!
You will just have to try it and see as cockpit designers are not renowned for their ergonomic prowess.
You will find that you can get into more aircraft than you think, but it may not be comfortable for a long period. The most important issue is can you get free control movement and can you get out if you have to. The DA20 has more headroom than a DA40 or 42 probably because it has cheaper (thinner) seats. When the seat raising mechanism on a PA28 fails it is frequently rigged in the up position making it impossible for some of us to get in!
You will just have to try it and see as cockpit designers are not renowned for their ergonomic prowess.
I'm only 6' and I had a very uncomfortable time in a DR400-120 yesterday! Even with the seat all the way back and starting to tip backwards (which is a rather weird and uncomfortable design) my legs were a little cramped.
I have had no trouble in any Cessnas or Pipers so far, and the Robin 2160 has been fine too. Grob 115, T67C, all ok!
I have had no trouble in any Cessnas or Pipers so far, and the Robin 2160 has been fine too. Grob 115, T67C, all ok!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the low lands
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies!
That is true. A friend of mine (approx. same height), fitted much better in the DA-40. It was still not very good.
What about the Cirrus SR20/SR22?
People are proportioned differently.
What about the Cirrus SR20/SR22?
What about the Cirrus SR20/SR22?
Even with the seat all the way back and starting to tip backwards (which is a rather weird and uncomfortable design)