Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Pilot Controlled Lighting - UK

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Pilot Controlled Lighting - UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th June 2010 | 10:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: France & UK
Pilot Controlled Lighting - UK

Does anyone know where in the southern part of the UK (around east anglia and london area) offer pilot controlled lighting??? There is one place in Norfolk, but due to Nimby's looks like they will never use it.

Anyone got ideas?

VFR
VFR Transit is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2010 | 10:50
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
I heard of a strip near Ongar which had this, but that was years ago.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2010 | 10:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Ahhh!! I do love these things.

A few clicks for the PAPIs/VASIs, and a few more clicks to turn on the runway lights...

I'm not aware of any in the UK.
fuzzy6988 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2010 | 11:11
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: France & UK
Seething has PCL, but they refuse to use it

The UK really sucks at times

VFR
VFR Transit is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2010 | 11:11
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
It is widely reputed to be illegal as far as the CAA is concerned, though I have no idea if this is true.

Obviously, for a private strip, you would just do it and not tell anybody. However a smarter and more secure way might be to use SMS control - there are various boxes on the market (example) which will turn things on/off using SMS. I have one right next to me, enabling various routers/switches to be reset with an SMS.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2010 | 12:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Paper Street
Did the strip on Bute not have PCL for the air ambulance to use?
Tyler Durden is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2010 | 15:52
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Yes indeed Loganair used PCL lighting on Bute.
fisbangwollop is offline  
Reply
Old 26th June 2010 | 21:49
  #8 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,115
Likes: 1,091
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Pilot / radio controlled ground lighting is not unusual in the rotary world.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 07:29
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
The bill for some lights is insignificant provided the thing is on a timer.

Maybe they had abuse from flyers-by. In that case, use the SMS solution, and register only specific caller numbers to operate it. Faking a caller ID on GSM is virtually impossible.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 08:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
We have them.
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 10:03
  #11 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is widely reputed to be illegal as far as the CAA is concerned, though I have no idea if this is true.
The CAA position a few years ago was that the frequency band was allocated to voice communications by the ITU and that switching things on and off is not voice comms. The guy who set this policy is now long gone from the CAA so maybe things have changed and a more practical view may be held.
 
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 13:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
And yet they allowed radios with squelch. Sounds like double standards to me.
Wrong Stuff is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 17:37
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
Likes: 1
From: England
Just out of interest how much does it cost to install the equipment that would upgrade bog standard lighting like we have in the UK to PCL.
Mickey Kaye is online now  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 18:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
Just out of interest how much does it cost to install the equipment that would upgrade bog standard lighting like we have in the UK to PCL.
About $1000 plus fitting - Pilot Controlled Lighting
Wrong Stuff is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 18:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 1
From: United Kingdom
If it is solely a legal issue that would seem rather petty.
If you want petty then the Wireless Telegraphy Act is the place to find it. I was wondering about the legality of MCW (A2A) transmissions in a band authorised for AM telephony (A3E) and datalink (ACARS) but, as yet, I have not found any definitive requirements on the Ofcom website as to permitted modulation types in the VHF aeronautical mobile band and so have been keeping my powder dry.

Where's Whopity when you need him?
BillieBob is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 20:10
  #16 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Didn't the Cons promise to shut down Ofcom?
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 20:38
  #17 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For the CAA, the problem with PCL at licensed aerodromes, lies with a cheeky little paragraph in our favourite bedtime read; CAP168 In particular the controlling words are in Chapter 6.

A sumptuous prize to the first Forumite to quote it

Sir George Cayley
 
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 21:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: UK
I would guess that CAP168, 11.1.3
"The control of an AGL system from beyond the boundary of a licensed aerodrome will only be approved by the CAA for the sole use of the emergency services. Where this type of control is desired, an operational requirement proposed by the aerodrome authority and supported by the emergency services involved should be submitted in the first instance to the CAA."
would effectively preclude pilot controlled lighting?
rogerp is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 21:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: UK
I think you'll find it's Chapter 6 para 11.1.3

The control of an AGL system from beyond the boundary of a licensed aerodrome will only be approved by the CAA for the sole use of the emergency services. Where this type of control is desired, an operational requirement proposed by the aerodrome authority and supported by the emergency services involved should be submitted in the first instance to the CAA.

And

11.1.4
When in use, the operational status of the AGL system should be continuously monitored. An appropriate means of detecting an AGL system failure or fault and other serviceability information should be provided. The AGL system serviceability information should be provided to the AGL operator in a simple but accurate and concise way, so that if necessary the user may pass a report to flight crew. The report should enable flight crew to determine whether the AGL meets their current operational flight requirements or not (see paragraph 11.3.5).

We fell foul of this when we wanted to provide the AGL for public transport helis operating outside the published aerodrome hours.
Satcop is offline  
Reply
Old 27th June 2010 | 21:11
  #20 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
But surely this is pure bollox.

Mandating the wearing of pink underpants would be as relevant to flight safety.

How can somebody come up with this "regulatory" garbage and keep a straight face?

If one could turn runway lights OFF remotely, that would not be so clever. But turning lights ON ???
IO540 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.