Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Fighting the red baron

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Fighting the red baron

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jun 2010, 19:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fighting the red baron

Tonight on channel 4. 21.00. Fast jet pilots experiencing ww1 aircraft.
DO.
dont overfil is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 08:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Herts.
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't fancy landing the Avro 504 (no brakes!)

I thought the programme was interesting to see how aerial combat began quite chivalrous, at first, to become a developed form of warfare. Its quite difficult to imagine professional soldiers waving at the enemy!
The Heff is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 18:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Sussex, England
Posts: 487
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One at least of the two WWI a/c looked suspiciously like a replica, certainly it had a flat 4 engine (possibly a Continental ?) up front.

And I can't imagine the Shuttleworth trustees being too keen to let film making folk play around for hours with the genuine article.

mike
mikehallam is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2010, 21:43
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,233
Received 51 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by The Heff
I don't fancy landing the Avro 504 (no brakes!)

I thought the programme was interesting to see how aerial combat began quite chivalrous, at first, to become a developed form of warfare. Its quite difficult to imagine professional soldiers waving at the enemy!
I'm sorry to say I missed it, but doubtless it'll get repeated sometime soon.

But on the brakes issue - those of us with lots of quality time in older microlights are very used to this. I can claim about 300 hrs on low performance aeroplanes without brakes. On grass, it's a non-issue, on a downslope on tarmac it can be quite exciting, but hard runways didn't exist during WW1 so that's a non-issue also.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 08:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fighting the Red Baron - 4oD - Channel 4
Tupperware Pilot is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2010, 10:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Genghis the Engineer
I'm sorry to say I missed it, but doubtless it'll get repeated sometime soon.

But on the brakes issue - those of us with lots of quality time in older microlights are very used to this. I can claim about 300 hrs on low performance aeroplanes without brakes. On grass, it's a non-issue, on a downslope on tarmac it can be quite exciting, but hard runways didn't exist during WW1 so that's a non-issue also.
I concur, I regularly fit brake pads/shoes on aircraft for folk who seem to live on the brakes. I too flew mirages/pathfinders/quicksilvers in the old days and got used to not having brakes.... in fact I put over 700 hours on the C42 and never fitted brakes, I only used them on strips <200m or when finishing up a parking manoeuvre from about 2mph.
Good programme, have it on disk if anyone wants it.
jonkil is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2010, 08:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Just South of the last ice sheet
Posts: 2,681
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
The "Junkers" is a modified Bowers Fly Baby and I think the "SE5a" is a 3/4 scale replica based on a modified Currie Wot. How they handle in comparison to the real things I have no idea and as there are no flying Junkers CL1's any more I don't think there is anybody alive who does know. According to the replica's owners the Red Airforce operated captured examples until the early 1930's as they were very good aeroplanes. I'm reasonably sure that the Fly Baby is non-aerobatic whereas the Wot is at least semi-aerobatic so it's no surprise that the Se5a won the dogfighting!

An entertaining program but the only flying that accurately reflected reality was the photography from the genuine Bristol F2b from Shuttleworth.
LowNSlow is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2010, 11:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could have done the whole thing so much more accurately had they got the Old Rhienbeck folks to provide the aircraft and do the flying. There are accurate replicas out there that can be reasonably flown to 3-4G that could be flown by their normal pilots in a way that is safe and much more representative of the real thing.

I guess that would be much harder to put together though, when there is the option of a pair of cheap to insure ex-service pilots and two very replaceable 1930's lookalike planes. I personally don't give a damn what a Harrier pilot thinks of a Currie Wot.
FleetFlyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.