Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Managing fuel burn on x-country w/C172

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Managing fuel burn on x-country w/C172

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2010, 23:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL370
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Managing fuel burn on x-country w/C172

guys,

I just had a question about how most of you manage your fuel on a x-country flight with a C172. Do you normally leave the fuel valve on both or do you switch it over to left/right after take off, then once you're down to a few gallons on one side you switch over to the other? I normally leave it on both, but I'd like to hear what some of you out there are doing. I've heard on some airplanes, you have to switch tanks after so many hours etc. What is your best practice on fuel management for a C172?

Thanks

SVENSK!
SVENSK is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2010, 23:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 37
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure I like the idea of letting one tank run nearly dry. The gauges are unreliable at the best of times! (why would you run the risk of a fuel stoppage??) Not to mention the longitudinal trim issues that would arise.

Why not just select the appropriate tank (or both) to maintain a balanced loading?

Not flown the 172 myself, but I have flown
other aircraft with selectable tanks. Its good practise to switch from one tank to another during run ups to ensure you have a positive feed from each tank.

Speak to your instructor if I were you






Last edited by Slipstream86; 17th Mar 2010 at 00:04.
Slipstream86 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 00:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: KBOS
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the C172 gravity feed? Just leave it on both unless you have a fuel imbalance for some reason (fuel addded to one side only - or previous operator ran down one tank?).

Your question may be more appropriate for low wing (such as pipers) where you cannot run off both tanks - an engine driven pump delivers the fuel from the selected tank. For pipers I usually just run 30 minutes on each side assuming I am starting off with equal fuel in each tank. If one tank has more fuel then run that down until equal or less than the other.
UncleNobby is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 00:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have flown the C172. The C172 is gravity fed, so no need for fuel pump on takeoff. I seem to recall fuel is selected to both to ensure a balanced burn and in terms of fuel management; I would advise you LEAN the mixture, unless you want to burn 10 US GAL/hr instead of 6 US GAL/hr. You want to ensure the mixture knob is on the "rich" side, by increasing the richness by 2 turns clockwise (at least in the a/c I've flown).

As stated above, check with your instructor, as every a/c is slightly different.
Cirrus_Clouds is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 00:53
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL370
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C172 is gravity feed, and I actually run it on both all of the time. I simply wanted to know what other C-172 drivers do on their x-country flights, that's all. I have heard that on pipers you do have to switch tanks after a few minutes though.

SVENSK!
SVENSK is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 00:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Westborough
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SVENSK

Start with your POH as it has all the answers , the norm is both but there are some exceptions such as fuel inbalance etc. its been a while since I flew one in traning bit its all in the manual.
CenAir is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 00:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I was taught to switch tanks in the Pa38/28 I use to fly, but since flying the C172, the fuel has been kept on both. You have manual control there if you want it any how, by selecting L or R.
Cirrus_Clouds is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 02:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL370
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks guys!

SVENSK!
SVENSK is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 10:19
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Above & Beyond
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew the C172 from Orlando to Alabama (near Birmingham) on one tank of fuel, it took about 5 hours.

Keep the tank fuel selector on both, but if you have a cross wind then one tank will burn quicker than the other so watch out for that. If that is the case then simply switch the valve left or right till its balanced.

If you have an EGT/GPH gauge- lean the mixture till both the needles are touching eachother (horizontally) as this is the optimum so I have been told.

If the EGT gauge is broken then simply lean the mixture slowly till the engine starts to sound like its going to lose power then move the mixture control slight forward of that. That is also Piper's SOP's on how to lean the engines on there aircraft. My instructor contacted them to find out.
punk666 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 12:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pipers behave differently as there is no 'both' setting, thus you have to switch regularly.

Cessnas will often/usually empty the tanks unevenly due to the way the venting and crossfeeds work - personally it's not something I worry about, they even out in the end, the engine won't quit until both are empty. Crosswind has nothing to do with it however.

'Both' should be selected as per the POH for takeoff and landing, as out of balance flight can uncover one or other tank feeds.

Leaning is an entirely separate subject I won't get into here, just do it by the POH.
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 13:22
  #11 (permalink)  
jxc
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 51
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I keep our 172 on both
jxc is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 13:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you have a cross wind then one tank will burn quicker than the other so watch out for that
The wing-low technique for countering a crosswind is only done on short final. Not throughout the entire flight. Not very efficient, and not very comfy for the passengers either.

If you have an EGT/GPH gauge- lean the mixture till both the needles are touching eachother (horizontally) as this is the optimum so I have been told.

If the EGT gauge is broken then simply lean the mixture slowly till the engine starts to sound like its going to lose power then move the mixture control slight forward of that. That is also Piper's SOP's on how to lean the engines on there aircraft. My instructor contacted them to find out.
Do not arbitrarily follow advice that "you've been told" or that's lifted from the POH of another aircraft. Check the POH of the aircraft you're flying. You only get book performance if you apply book technique.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 14:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Above & Beyond
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BackPacker,

Regarding the wing low technique during the cruise, I didnt mean that at all. During my cross country flying I found that when having a cross wind one tank burned more quickly than the other.

An examiner and numerous instructors mentioned the EGT/GPH gauge to lean the engine.
Also about using the same techniques for different planes: Of course I wouldn't suggest doing that all I did was merely mention that the same technique just so happend to be used on pipers as well.

If in doubt check the POH
punk666 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 14:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,559
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
When leaning, keep an eye on the oil temp gauge. If it goes up, you might want to enrich it a tad more.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 14:57
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
During my cross country flying I found that when having a cross wind one tank burned more quickly than the other.
Then you're flying out of balance somehow, or this is a built-in trait of your particular Cessna. But it doesn't have anything to do with crosswind. (Or rather, it shouldn't. But you might unconsciously applying bad pilot technique because with a crosswind the sight picture moves laterally, if you look dead ahead. If you compensate for that with the rudder, then you'll be flying out of balance. Something your instructor should have picked up on, and stamped out of you.)

An examiner and numerous instructors mentioned the EGT/GPH gauge to lean the engine.
Well, yes, if you have an EGT and/or GPH gauge then these are commonly used in leaning. But EGT and GPH are totally different measurements, and influenced by several independent factors. So to say that the optimum leaning point is when the EGT and GPH needles intersect somehow is nonsense.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 15:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Above & Beyond
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I said that the needles would be horizontal from each other not just intercepting each other.

Well if im flying wings level, ball in the centre, with wind correction and it still does it im guessing it must be that aircraft in particular. Alot of the students used to sit on the elevators to lift the nose wheel up so they can maneuver the aircraft on the ground, this would cause the plane to have natural turning characteristics due to damage and strain.

If I managed to get 5 hours straight out of a 172 I must of done something right
punk666 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 15:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I noted, the 172 will generally burn fuel unevenly out of both tanks; this is because there is a vent in one side, and an internal crossfeed to vent the other.

It has nothing to do with crosswind, the aircraft flies in an air mass, and has no concept of how that air mass is moving.

As for the other, I'm pretty sure EGT should be fairly constant for a properly leaned engine at a given throttle setting. As you climb (and re-lean), the fuel flow will reduce.
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 15:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I leave our 172SP fuel on BOTH throughout survey flights (90-120 minutes).

Once in the cruise I also lean the mixture.
TrafficPilot is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 18:08
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
172 leave on 'both'. There is a slight imbalance as to which tank empties first, due to the venting installation. This can get quite pronounced on the 182 (don't ask me why), and those I sometimes fly in such a way that fuel is first drawn from the slower-emptying tank. After an hour or so, back to 'both'.

The PA28 series of course doesn't have a 'both' selector, so you have to switch tanks. My way of doing so is to fly on the tank corresponding to the position of the minute hand on my wristwatch. IOW, if in the left hemisphere, left tank, right hemisphere, right tank. Keeps it balanced.
172driver is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2010, 21:31
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,781
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If flying a rental plane, on a long trip I run one tank very low, checking it at stops. Then I have an indication of fuel burn. On final leg, I'm happier with one half full tank, then two tanks both quarter full. Pa28 and Pa38 feel O.K with tank imballance.
Maoraigh1 is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.