Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

UAVs over Essex and Kent

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

UAVs over Essex and Kent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 08:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,782
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
UAVs over Essex and Kent

Motorists and fly tippers could be targeted by police spy planes - Telegraph

Police proposing to use Unmanned Aerial Vehicles over Essex and Kent. The last time, it was Strathclyde police who were involved. Nothing much came of it, but their site plans were very different from what the CAA said they had authorised.
Maoraigh1 is online now  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 10:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On the move
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would be really worse than a big brother
ab33t is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 10:27
  #3 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 433 Likes on 228 Posts
Surely, General Jumbo could help!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 11:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I foresee a future of compulsory mode S, and TRAs popping up all over the place, at short notice.
soay is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 17:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kernow
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have often wondered whether one of the reasons for Mode S is to facilitate the 'mixing' of UAVs and GA in the same airspace?
2hotwot is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 17:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a waste of tax payers money. Gits.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 18:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 18nm NE grice 28ft up
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who would see you shoot one down.
Those of you with warbirds step forward.
DO
dont overfil is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 19:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: overhead
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should be possible to take em out with RC model aircraft long live the revolution
toomanyloops is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 21:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2hotwot
I have often wondered whether one of the reasons for Mode S is to facilitate the 'mixing' of UAVs and GA in the same airspace?
Seem to recall one of the stated objectives in the CAA Mode-S (lack of) consultation exercise was to enable the "interoperability" of all aircraft, including UAV's.
gpn01 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2010, 23:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE] Those of you with warbirds step forward./QUOTE]

Reckon I could do it with a Cub and a shotgun.

But then the mangled UAV would only be replaced using more of my hard earned, taxed money.

Mode S is a pants idea. Just look at the Dutch example. Waste of time and money. I too have an excellent idea for avoiding air-to-air collisions, but it doesn't involve unscrupulous money making scandals so it's of no use to anyone. Just fly around with your eyes open..... And remember to scan across the sky.... Frequently.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 00:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not a million miles from EGTF
Age: 68
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... all it would take is for one of these nice new toys to fall out of the sky on to a puppy farm for them to be put out of service.

Or, the government could close all puppy farms. You never can tell with this bunch.
robin is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 01:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure comrade Brown would like us all microchipped

I hope all this surveillance ends after the election.
Phil Space is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 12:42
  #13 (permalink)  

Mess Your Passage
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Temporarily Unaware......
Age: 25
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm this gives me an idea.....

V-1 flying bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hugs

xxx

f
Flash0710 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 19:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah! Good idea flash. Launch your Spitty and we'll see if we can topple these little fekkers gyros and make 'em splash into the drink.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 20:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,778
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
According to CAA rules UAV's can only be operated outside controlled airspace if they can sense other traffic and be sensed by other traffic.

I have always believed that this is what Mode S is really all about.

Light UAVs can only be operated up to 50M from the operator and must remain in sight, just like model aeroplanes.

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/1416/srg_s...-01-180604.pdf
pulse1 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2010, 17:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Britain
Age: 74
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UAVs aren't able to operate outside of notified danger areas at the present time. It's a legislative minefield so it won't happen anytime soon, but it will eventually.
BristolScout is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2010, 18:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BristolScout
UAVs aren't able to operate outside of notified danger areas at the present time. It's a legislative minefield so it won't happen anytime soon, but it will eventually.
Certification by 2012, implementation by 2015 if the article in Flight is to be believed:European Union expects civil unmanned air vehicles to use general aviation equipment
gpn01 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2010, 07:53
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think that a UAV is likely to be any more of a danger to me than a Cesna 172 being flown by the new breed of magenta line cowboys, both have next to no time for "lookout".

At least the UAV is going to continue on track if you see it at the last moment rather than turning unpredictably.
A and C is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2010, 09:35
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An autonomous UAV will certainly have active TCAS so will avoid you - assuming you are transponding, and if you are not transponding then nobody (like, for example, Farnborough Radar) will see you anyway; well not in a manner that is actually useful to anybody being provided with their service
IO540 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2010, 12:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central London
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It all sounds great until one goes wrong and comes down in the middle of Southend or Maidstone
Phil Space is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.