Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Rules of Thumb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th October 2009 | 19:29
  #21 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: The Twilight Zone near 30W
A 3 degree glideslope.
Human Factor is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 19:45
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Pinchbeck
Rule of Thumb

Hi all
Thanks for all your responses,

I have one for you, if its any use.

To quickly determine NM per minute, round your airspeed to the nearest 10, drop the zero and divide by 6.

Example TAS =178KTS = 180knots

Drop the zero and divide by 6:
18 divided by 6 = 3NM per minute
Rocketier is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 19:59
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Pinchbeck
With regard Glide slope.
Another one is add a zero to your ground then half it.

IE: 50knts add 0 = 500 half it =250ft/min

what do you think?
Rocketier is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 20:12
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
A 3 degree glideslope
Why not track the glideslope as indicated by the glideslope indicator?
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 20:22
  #25 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 1
From: World citizen
Easier for GS

Your ground speed divided by 2 . ex : 150 KT gs , vs =750'/mn
dan1165 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 20:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: UK
Quote:
A 3 degree glideslope

Why not track the glideslope as indicated by the glideslope indicator?
During a Non Precision approach such as a VOR/DME Procedure with a promulgated 3 degree slope.
contrail is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 20:48
  #27 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
OK, I get that.

I just wondered how many NP approaches have their continuous descent alternative at exactly 3 degrees, while not having the pre-calculated FPM figures (for various GS values) shown on the chart.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 22:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
To quickly determine NM per minute, round your airspeed to the nearest 10, drop the zero and divide by 6.
To determine the IQ of a random group of people, take the lowest IQ of the group, multiply by ten, add fifty, divide by ten, subtract five.
BackPacker is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2009 | 23:02
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Why not track the glideslope as indicated by the glideslope indicator?
Maybe it is just me, but surely you find it easier to "nominate" an initial rate of descent once the glideslope has been intercepted and thereafter to make adjustments to descent rate in order to maintain the slope , rather than simply charging up and down the sky hoping to recapture it?

Edit.. all so much easier on autopilot of course..
flybymike is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2009 | 00:51
  #30 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
Community Builder
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 7,089
Likes: 2,952
From: Ontario, Canada
subtract five.
People from the random group? or IQ points?

....You only have too much fuel when you are on fire....
Pilot DAR is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2009 | 06:43
  #31 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
Maybe it is just me, but surely you find it easier to "nominate" an initial rate of descent once the glideslope has been intercepted and thereafter to make adjustments to descent rate in order to maintain the slope , rather than simply charging up and down the sky hoping to recapture it?
Obviously one doesn't just "charge up and down the sky hoping...".

At the GS intercept, I drop the gear and select 1st stage flap. This gives me very close to the required -VS. And the aircraft remains trimmed as it was before. This is IMHO better than trimming in a hurry at the GS intercept.

I am sure others have different methods.
IO540 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 04:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Have heard that

"halve your groundspeed, multiply that by 10" will keep you pretty close to a 3deg slope.

also
5x your groundspeed = required ROD for a 3 degree approach.

the above are the same, just depends on how good you are at maths!!!

sorry if someone has mentioned it and i've missed it and am repeating!


DAR, you said "you only have too much fuel when you are on fire"...

.....or if you have a boss like mine that books too many people on a flight in the heaviest aircraft and you are already on min fuel and get an earbashing from them because you 'have too much and we havn't had this problem before'.....
MyNameIsIs is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 07:42
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Arizona Bay
300' above field elevation per ever mile on final will keep you outta trouble

@1 mile...300 AGL, 2 miles 600 AGL...so on and so forth

basic pilot stuff, works every time, no matter what airplane you're in, big or small...
DA-10mm is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 07:51
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Arizona Bay
this has been totally abused on an earlier thread, for sure, but here we go...

can't use the runway behind you
can't use the altitude above you
the only time that you'll ever have too much fuel on board is when you're on fire...

git sum!
never jim-jam the flim-flam...
DA-10mm is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 08:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: UK
....You only have too much fuel when you are on fire....
... or with 2 rugby players in a C150
worrab is offline  
Reply
Old 16th October 2009 | 11:05
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
300' above field elevation per ever mile on final will keep you outta trouble

@1 mile...300 AGL, 2 miles 600 AGL...so on and so forth

basic pilot stuff, works every time, no matter what airplane you're in, big or small...
But it doesnt work if you are making an approach to somewhere like Oban where there is an 1100ft mountain a mile from the threshold...
flybymike is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 17:31
  #37 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
From: uk
At single/light twin approach speeds, 100rpm or 1" of manifold pressure is worth about 100 fpm
Skylark58 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th October 2009 | 09:15
  #38 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 38
Likes: 63
From: The Smaller Antipode
Is anyone actually looking out of the window ?

My first Nav. instructor told me to stop doing a maths exam in a rattling steel cabinet. Same goes for flying the beast. KISS
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.