Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

C172 crash at Humberside yesterday afternoon

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

C172 crash at Humberside yesterday afternoon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2009, 17:54
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helimutt

Then we come to the point of the ATC part in all this. We know that ATC give seperation for take off and landings behind heavy aircraft which they suspect may cause wake turbulence problems. The same duty of care should lie with ATC mixing light aircraft and helicopters? surely?

The only other point is keeping speed high in light aircraft and being aware of a possible unexpected shear around Helicopters . I do not understand the fear in carrying 10 to 15kts extra speed in a single aircraft and knocking it off when assured of landing. Speed is your saviour. Yet many pilots seem to fly their 70kts regardless of winds turbulence or other aircraft and dont have enough in hand if it all goes pear shaped.

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2009, 20:02
  #42 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Each to their own. As was posted above somewhere, an S76 is considered a light aircraft and so some people think no spacing required. ??
helimutt is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2009, 20:46
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then we come to the point of the ATC part in all this. We know that ATC give seperation for take off and landings behind heavy aircraft which they suspect may cause wake turbulence problems. The same duty of care should lie with ATC mixing light aircraft and helicopters? surely?


No it doesn't.

If you are number two to an aircraft (be it helicopter or fixed wing) on final approach, you will always be given the recommended wake turbulance minima and it is the pilots responsibility to ensure that they apply it.

If you are being vectored for an IFR approach the IFR minima is always greater than the wake turbulance minima between aircraft.

The only time it is mandatory for ATC to apply wake turbulance separation within the aerodrome environment is on departure, even then, a wait 2 or 3 minutes seems too much for some pilots, you'd be suprised how many push to go early.
goatface is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.