Landing at Larger Airports in a SEP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bradford
Age: 42
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Landing at Larger Airports in a SEP
I'm a low hours pilot and to gain experience I'm looking to land at a larger airport in a SEP.
Does anyone have any recomendations for larger airports that are cheap to land and challenging, even ones that will allow touch and gos to avoid handling fees.
Does anyone have any recomendations for larger airports that are cheap to land and challenging, even ones that will allow touch and gos to avoid handling fees.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
On a joyride from Jandakot the instructor asked me if I wanted to do a touch-and-go at Perth International. I got the impression (a) that he was serious and (b) that he wouldn't have suggested it if it had been expensive.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SX in SX in UK
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The words 'larger airports' and 'cheap' do not sit easily together, nor does 'avoid handling fees' .
By 'larger airports' do you mean busier airports, or airports with huge runways and no traffic? ISTR someone taking a PA-28 into Gatwick recently, it was quite painless, only cost about £800.
Its probably more challenging to get into a small airport with a high volume of traffic than a large airport with low numbers of traffic.
By 'larger airports' do you mean busier airports, or airports with huge runways and no traffic? ISTR someone taking a PA-28 into Gatwick recently, it was quite painless, only cost about £800.
Its probably more challenging to get into a small airport with a high volume of traffic than a large airport with low numbers of traffic.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where to plant it ?
Dom
I wouldn't get too steamed up about the "big airport" idea.
You'd be better off having a trip around some more interesting small airfields, and you'd learn a lot more and spend less on landing fees etc..
Having said that Leeds are very user-friendly and I believe Multiflight are worth a phone call to check on handling etc. Landing at Leeds is hardly challenging, but there are plenty of local airfields that are.
Get it out of your system and get on with some fun flying !
tth
I wouldn't get too steamed up about the "big airport" idea.
You'd be better off having a trip around some more interesting small airfields, and you'd learn a lot more and spend less on landing fees etc..
Having said that Leeds are very user-friendly and I believe Multiflight are worth a phone call to check on handling etc. Landing at Leeds is hardly challenging, but there are plenty of local airfields that are.
Get it out of your system and get on with some fun flying !
tth
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: LKBU
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luxembourg Findel (ELLX) is a full-fledged international airport with a 4000 m runway. Their daytime landing fee up to 2 tons is €6.10, though training flights are only allowed for locally based aircraft. Parking is €1.25 per ton per 24 hours.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leeds - be careful you'll spend 30 mins waiting to land and if your not taking fuel they will charge a handling fee.
DTV - GA friendly but charge handling circa £30-40
Newcastle - Likewise (£25 landing fee, £10 parking per night plus £15 handling)
IMO go to scotland
Dundee only charge £9.00 and they offer air traffic services (no handling)
or
Carlisle (no handling) £11.00 with air traffic during the week
Blackpool same as above
DTV - GA friendly but charge handling circa £30-40
Newcastle - Likewise (£25 landing fee, £10 parking per night plus £15 handling)
IMO go to scotland
Dundee only charge £9.00 and they offer air traffic services (no handling)
or
Carlisle (no handling) £11.00 with air traffic during the week
Blackpool same as above
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leeds (Multiflight) will charge you about £80 for handling I seem to recall, and the airport itself will hit you with a £40 "minimum charge" for landing. 
As an alternative, why not use that £120ish on fuel, and get yourself over to somewhere like Ostend on a nice day. Big airport, lots of heavy stuff to mix with, but very straigh forward and very reasonable fees IIRC ...
A lot more fun than shooting 25 miles up the road !
HJ
As an alternative, why not use that £120ish on fuel, and get yourself over to somewhere like Ostend on a nice day. Big airport, lots of heavy stuff to mix with, but very straigh forward and very reasonable fees IIRC ...
A lot more fun than shooting 25 miles up the road !
HJ
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now that we're talking mainland Europe anyway....
Try and get a transit west to east or vice versa through the Schiphol CTR. This will give you the experience minus the landing and the landing fee.
The routing Zandvoort-Hoofddorp-overhead the main tower-overhead the center of 04/22-Victor is generally available as it doesn't conflict with other traffic. And arguably gives you more experience in dealing with very large airports than just flying up to Victor and landing on 04/22.
Try and get a transit west to east or vice versa through the Schiphol CTR. This will give you the experience minus the landing and the landing fee.
The routing Zandvoort-Hoofddorp-overhead the main tower-overhead the center of 04/22-Victor is generally available as it doesn't conflict with other traffic. And arguably gives you more experience in dealing with very large airports than just flying up to Victor and landing on 04/22.
Upto The Buffers
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Leeds/Bradford
Age: 48
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leeds - be careful you'll spend 30 mins waiting to land
Usually people who say stuff like that have never been to Leeds. You'll get the occasional instance where the odd orbit might be required to counter for wake turbulance from a jet, but if you avoid the rush hour it's rare. More frequent is the "G-XX, keep it tight you're number 1" at which point you get to firewall everything, divebomb at the runway, drop the anchors at 200ft and do a nice little landing to zip off at the high speed exit (FKA Runway 27). My favourite type of approach.
Yes, there's a handling fee. Yes, the landing will be over £20. Yes, there's a very good cafe, extensive executive facilities and flight planning available in the rather luxurious crew room. Personally I'd rather spend my day hopping around a load of small grass strips, but if you want to go there, call and get a price then make your own decision.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes go to the USA. YOu can land at LAX for $20 which may get waived if you take on fuel or are just visiting for 10mins. Touch and go though....not likely, but you never know, if you go there at 01:00 they might allow it 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blackpool's not far from where you are. It's got full ATC, 3 runways, and a few Jet2.com flights a day. Their charges are documented here. PPR is necessary due to limited parking, but handling fees can probably be avoided by asking one of the flying schools (eg. Westair on 01253 404925) if you can park outside their hangar.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coventry? Landing fee in the Arrow was £16.
Southend? £22
Both Gave a radar vectored ILS as part of the service,
I last went to Newcastle in July and, including the compulsory handling, it cost £55, which I reckon is having the arse out of it. Having said that, I knew what the charge was going to be before I went, so my decision; I simply wouldn't choose to go back...
Southend? £22
Both Gave a radar vectored ILS as part of the service,
I last went to Newcastle in July and, including the compulsory handling, it cost £55, which I reckon is having the arse out of it. Having said that, I knew what the charge was going to be before I went, so my decision; I simply wouldn't choose to go back...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The words 'larger airports' and 'cheap' do not sit easily together
The big-airport cost situation is highly variable, ranging from a few quid/euros (not in the UK though), to £500 at say Gatwick which is a blatent mick-take.
However, flying to big airports is not the awesome experience some may think. The hardest thing is finding one's way around. One needs to read the airport map carefully and keep track of where one is. It is normal to get lost and one has to ask for taxi instructions. Even airliners get lost (plenty of jokes on that topic
).
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you want to build some experience by going to larger airports, then I don't think touch and goes will add much to it. The landing part is far easier at big airports then small ones, because....well....the runway is so much bigger.
What is different is :
1) Having to be more precise about how you are getting there. Ie being able to interact well with ATC, understand their instructions, and follow them. NB. know where the reporting points are, and how to get to them.
But this is no different really than flying through controlled airspace. You'll gain nothing in terms of experience here by landing, over and above what you would gain by simply transiting the airspace.
2) What is different about larger airports, is what happens on the ground. There are lots more taxiways, and you will be told explicity which ones you are to taxi via, and where you must stop if no further instructions are received. This involves having the taxiway diagram, and being able to read it and follow the instructions.
Also, after landing and before take off, you will have to talk to a ground controller instead of the Tower. No rocket science about this....just need to know who you need to call first, and who you are 'expecting' to call next.
Finally, before starting up to leave the airport, you may have to call a 'clearance delivery' frequency before contacting the ground frequency. For VFR flights, they generally do little more than find your flight plan, give you a sqwak code, and let you know what your departure route is likely to be (which will often be changed by the tower anyway).
All of the items in 2, would be missed out by doing just touch and goes.
Having said that, most of the airports that like to think of themselves as big, aren't actually busy enough to bother with ground controllers and clearance deliverys, in which case, they aren't much different to the smaller ones.
dp
What is different is :
1) Having to be more precise about how you are getting there. Ie being able to interact well with ATC, understand their instructions, and follow them. NB. know where the reporting points are, and how to get to them.
But this is no different really than flying through controlled airspace. You'll gain nothing in terms of experience here by landing, over and above what you would gain by simply transiting the airspace.
2) What is different about larger airports, is what happens on the ground. There are lots more taxiways, and you will be told explicity which ones you are to taxi via, and where you must stop if no further instructions are received. This involves having the taxiway diagram, and being able to read it and follow the instructions.
Also, after landing and before take off, you will have to talk to a ground controller instead of the Tower. No rocket science about this....just need to know who you need to call first, and who you are 'expecting' to call next.
Finally, before starting up to leave the airport, you may have to call a 'clearance delivery' frequency before contacting the ground frequency. For VFR flights, they generally do little more than find your flight plan, give you a sqwak code, and let you know what your departure route is likely to be (which will often be changed by the tower anyway).
All of the items in 2, would be missed out by doing just touch and goes.
Having said that, most of the airports that like to think of themselves as big, aren't actually busy enough to bother with ground controllers and clearance deliverys, in which case, they aren't much different to the smaller ones.
dp
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 41
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where did you get your ppl. I did mine at sherburn and the QXC took me to East Mids and Humberside plus I had another flight to Humberside solo.
Very enjoyable flights but nothing taxing really, like some have said it was actually easier as you can probably take off and land 3 times on the runways they are that long
Very enjoyable flights but nothing taxing really, like some have said it was actually easier as you can probably take off and land 3 times on the runways they are that long
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's not much there, but we had an excellent service from Durham Tees Valley at the weekend when we over-nighted. Reasonable landing fee (around £15 I think), and parking for 24 hours was about £6.
Mandatory handling was £10 from Midwest Executive, but for that, the nice lady came and got us in the van, took us to/from the hotel, got us a preferred rate at said hotel, pointed out the best places for food, and had the metars and tafs for our route north printed out in the bus on pick up the next day (all the met for the east coast from there to aberdeen - superb!).
Uber efficient and very friendly - very impressed! Will definately stop there again if I need an overnight on the East coast. Much cheaper than Humberside/Newcastle.
Mandatory handling was £10 from Midwest Executive, but for that, the nice lady came and got us in the van, took us to/from the hotel, got us a preferred rate at said hotel, pointed out the best places for food, and had the metars and tafs for our route north printed out in the bus on pick up the next day (all the met for the east coast from there to aberdeen - superb!).
Uber efficient and very friendly - very impressed! Will definately stop there again if I need an overnight on the East coast. Much cheaper than Humberside/Newcastle.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bristol
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could try Gloucester EGBJ. It is not really larger, but is almost always quite busy with circuit traffic and people doing instrument practice, plus 3 runways (makes you work out circuit) and longer taxiing. A bit more of a challenge than a single runway airfield and free landing voucher this month.
Not sure if it meets your requiremnt but Oxford (sorry, London Oxford) is a proper commercial airport although no scheduled traffic (I tell a lie, one a week in the summer, I think) and not too expensive. I did some T&G there in a PA28 recently for less than a tenner each. That's a weekend rate, it's more expensive Monday to Friday.
Gloucester already mentioned is big and busy for a GA pilot but very do-able, it was of the points on my QXC earlier this year.
Gloucester already mentioned is big and busy for a GA pilot but very do-able, it was of the points on my QXC earlier this year.