Touring in a C152
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Touring in a C152
I read an old article about a couple touring around Scotland in a 152. How is this possible for two adults? I can't see how you could take much more than a toothbrush unless my M&B figures are wrong?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 37
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see the problem if you're small like me
Christina Belton has done quite a few articles in Pilot over the years about touring in her C150. She went all the way to Italy and the Balkans and back in the 150. A trip around Scotland seems small fry compared to that!
I take issue with your comment however DX Re: washing facilities. You have obviously never been to Glasgow
Captain S
Christina Belton has done quite a few articles in Pilot over the years about touring in her C150. She went all the way to Italy and the Balkans and back in the 150. A trip around Scotland seems small fry compared to that!
I take issue with your comment however DX Re: washing facilities. You have obviously never been to Glasgow
Captain S
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm a slim 12 stone and my wife 9 stone which puts us about on the limit with full tanks. The chap in the photo doesn't look particularly light so is this last comment true that it can be flown above the POH MTOW?!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The 152 haven't read the POH, and will therefore happily fly above MTOW.
is this last comment true that it can be flown above the POH MTOW?!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: belgium
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes alot of them fly in overweight most of the times the students don't even know. I checked my last trip; the a/c empty weight was 100lbs above empty weight in the manual due to GPS installed, different equipment,...
We were two adults, one of which a big guy, both had our packs for 4 days and the two long range tanks (39 gals instead of the standard 24)were topped up. Which would put us overweight of about 200lbs. No difference was felt in handling or runway length.
But normally we have some bigger cessnas with us on trips or a car, so they can take the baggage.
We were two adults, one of which a big guy, both had our packs for 4 days and the two long range tanks (39 gals instead of the standard 24)were topped up. Which would put us overweight of about 200lbs. No difference was felt in handling or runway length.
But normally we have some bigger cessnas with us on trips or a car, so they can take the baggage.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We did a 4 day trip last week in a 150. Two adults, 20 kg luggage and full fuel.
Still a few kg below MTOW.
The trouble with 150/152 W&B is fat people and a fat plane.
Keep both light and you have a nice, small altough slow tourer.
Still a few kg below MTOW.
The trouble with 150/152 W&B is fat people and a fat plane.
Keep both light and you have a nice, small altough slow tourer.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From my experience at some airfields a lot of people seem to have the attitude of "well it was ok on the other flights with that much fuel, so it must be ok this time".
Ok, so maybe the C152 will fly grossly over-weight, but put your new PPL holder in a PA28 or similar and then maybe weight calculations will be a whole lot more significant!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is not difficult to do a mental W&B if it is an aircraft you are familiar with.
My own Cessna is a good example, I know exactly what the max weight per seat and the max fuel is before I have to re do a formal W&B. At those max figures I know I am inside the envelope, anything less and I am inside the envelope. Simples!!!
My own Cessna is a good example, I know exactly what the max weight per seat and the max fuel is before I have to re do a formal W&B. At those max figures I know I am inside the envelope, anything less and I am inside the envelope. Simples!!!
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My own Cessna is a good example, I know exactly what the max weight per seat and the max fuel is before I have to re do a formal W&B. At those max figures I know I am inside the envelope, anything less and I am inside the envelope. Simples!!!
Yep, I do(did) the same. W&B for my standard configurations. Anything else and I run the numbers.
Same with landing and take-off distances. 400m grass or tarmac is good enough when <2000ft AMSL and < 25C with no wind or slope. Otherwise I run the numbers again. For fuel burn I've measured it for a while. Now I know it is 18.5 l/hr(using 20l/hr to avoid headaches) @2450rpm giving me 85kts.
-Kees
Yep, I do(did) the same. W&B for my standard configurations. Anything else and I run the numbers.
Same with landing and take-off distances. 400m grass or tarmac is good enough when <2000ft AMSL and < 25C with no wind or slope. Otherwise I run the numbers again. For fuel burn I've measured it for a while. Now I know it is 18.5 l/hr(using 20l/hr to avoid headaches) @2450rpm giving me 85kts.
-Kees
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fat Cessna
@ 2450rpm unless you are seriously overweight then you should get more that 85kts in a '52.
I'm not small and with a reasonable passenger and some fuel (think egg up!) I get 85 at 2150rpm.
I'm not small and with a reasonable passenger and some fuel (think egg up!) I get 85 at 2150rpm.