Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Manchester Low Level Route

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Manchester Low Level Route

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2009, 06:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done Okavango, hope you enjoyed the flight Ignore the earlier stupid comment re GPS - its all very well advising people to follow the "Old Sankey canal" when you live in and know the area as magpienja evidently does - quite something else when you're not local and faced with umpteen waterways including the river Mersey, the Leeds Liverpool canal and the Manchester ship canal
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2009, 08:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
GPS

Why cannot some old f..ts realise that GPS is now the primary means of nav for most of us in light aircraft. GPS to maintain track, with a map backup, not the other way around. In public transport IFR ops it is normally the sole means of airways flight.
I cannot remember when I last manually tuned a VHF NAV aid, except the ILS to land, in the jet aircraft I fly in my day job.
In the case of the Manchester LLR etc. GPS waypoints should be published, as are most VRPS on our topo maps, that would make for a far safer operation.
GPS Aproaches??? Don't get me started! In the USA there are now 1500+ stand alone GPS procedures, all using the same satelites and nav equipment we use in UK.
(Usual caveats apply regarding hand held GPS and up to date data-base etc.)
cessnapete is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2009, 11:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: By the big Teapot
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
In the case of the Manchester LLR etc. GPS waypoints should be published, as are most VRPS on our topo maps, that would make for a far safer operation.
Couldn't agree more. We tried to get this done on several occasions over a period of years. However, the objection was that this would focus traffic down a particular track. I did point out that it was possible to fly an offset and we could make it quite clear that this was desirable in the various publications, (both official and unofficial). I also though it would enable us to establish a 'flow' system through the LLR. The CAA view favoured the establishment of VRP's which are roughly along the edge of the LLR as the preferable option. I can't see it myself but there you are.
As to navigating the LLR by GPS. Well, let's face it, if you have a valuable tool available that you find works for you then why not? Speaking from the position of an 'old fart' I know the route well and navigate it visually but....I've got my Garmin 296 set with the route and a plog as well. I like to have a card up my sleeve.
Spiney Norman is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2009, 18:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Cessnapete: Speaking as an old fart, you're right that GPS seems a lot more sensible, and it may well be that the reason it hasn't been adopted is that the CAA is also populated with people similar to myself. I do think though that you really need to teach people how to fly a heading and if you fly on GPS as your primary aid there's a very strong temptation to track-crawl and spend too much time head-down.

As to Manch LLR nav methods, I always go (southbound) Reebok Stadium to Leigh Flash then track the Whitegate NDB. Might be cheating but it works for me.

NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2009, 20:50
  #25 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
Speaking as an fart even older than some in the CAA.....

I put in two GPS waypoints, fly relative to the line on heading mode and look (and listen) outside for conflicting traffic on the appropriate frequency while squawking mode C . I also use the TCAS in an appropriate way to enhance my own traffic awareness.

I therefore don't have to worry about navigation and it's surely safer because I'm not tied up eyes looking at a chart, or for ground features.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 14:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wigan, England
Age: 33
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A friend has asked to come on a flight with me and has asked if we can fly over his house.

His house is about 1 mile north west of haydock park racecourse. I'm just checking that I would be allowed to circle over his house to convince a non flyer that the trip is worth £40 (providing I have a good look out for any aircraft around). I got thrown off when reading the NATS guide.

Thanks.
Rodge91 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 18:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: norf of inngland
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just give LPL radar a call on 119.850 ak for a basic service giving them your intentions , they wont have a problem with it , judging by where oyu want to go , set up for SSC circling aorund your mates house , the wind may just put you inside their zone , so just give them a quick shout and let them know they will be fine with it . Only prob you will have is if all the RYR's and sleazys are returning or leaving in which case you wont get a word in edgeways.
I recently had to take some piccies of Burtonwood , it really is no issue .
have fun
GIZZAJOB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.