Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

BRNAV equipment on ICAO flight plan

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

BRNAV equipment on ICAO flight plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2009, 07:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BRNAV equipment on ICAO flight plan

How do you confirm that you have BRNAV equipment on the ICAO flight plan form. In my case I have standard coms and also a mode S transponder. I understand that you should put the letter "R" in field no 10. Should I insert SR/S in this field or is it S/RS or something else.
Tolka is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 08:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere around
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the transponder goes after the /. So is SR/S.
R stand that you meet the RNP required for the route that you are going to fly.
crjlover is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 08:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standard comms (VHF RTF, ADS, VOR, ILS) and a mode S would be S/S.

Depending on what you mean with BRNAV capability (GPS, INS, something else) you might need to add C, G, R, W, X, Y.

Most likely you'll be looking at SG/S. If you have anything fancier than that, you're probably in the wrong forum.

This is one of the hits that Google came up with:

Atlas Aviation - ICAO Flight Plan instructions directions information

In another thread a week or so ago we discussed the merits of the equipment field, and it was confirmed that ATC doesn't look at the field to decide what sort of routing they'll give you. Even if you only file S/S they'll happily clear you direct to an intersection hundreds of miles away. On the other hand, I have heard stories that the Eurocontrol computer will throw a flight plan out if your equipment doesn't meet the minimum route requirement, particularly mode-S.
BackPacker is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 08:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard stories that the Eurocontrol computer will throw a flight plan out if your equipment doesn't meet the minimum route requirement, particularly mode-S.
The only equipment list issue I know of which CFMU will chuck a flight out for is not declaring 8.33 if filing at FL200+. I've tested this and it does indeed happen.

Maybe it chucks out some RVSM-airspace stuff too but that comes in a lot higher up.

The one bizzare thing which I did recently get was some "overly diligent" operative at homebriefing.com who amended my filed route (which was NOT marked "ifps reroute accepted) from FL100 to FL090 because I filed (as I always do) S/S and thus did not declare BRNAV carriage which is mandatory at FL100+. So now I always file SYRG/S

I am not sure that SG/S would be enough, because while GPS is the only means of GA compliance with BRNAV, it is actually the BRNAV bit (R) which matters in the legal equipment-carriage sense. A suitably approved KNS80 would actually meet BRNAV too legally (though not usefully).
IO540 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 09:53
  #5 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lack of PRNAV, 8.33, and RVSM are the only things flagged up at the UK Area Control Centres ... where it's appropriate for the filed flight.
10W is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 10:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lack of PRNAV?

Is there any PRNAV-mandatory enroute airspace yet? (Amsterdam TMA at night; somebody mentioned).

There are PRNAV SIDs/STARs but CFMU does not check that - especially as all airports concerned have non PRNAV ones (they have to).
IO540 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2009, 13:15
  #7 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can ATC clear you for a PRNAV procedure if they don't know your equipment fit ? That's why the system takes it from your flight plan.

I didn't mention anything about mandatory airspace or your plan being rejected by CFMU (although I think you probably mean IFPS), simply that the lack of PRNAV is flagged up to UK ACCs. This is so they can give an appropriate clearance to an individual aircraft ..... where it's appropriate for the filed flight and routes exist. If you have the choice of following a PRNAV route or a 'normal' one, then at least UK ACC's are going to know which one you can accept without getting in to a long winded conversation on the RT about what you can and can't fly.

Assuming you've filed the plan correctly in the first place of course
10W is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 20:02
  #8 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In UK controlled airspace volumes B-RNAV starts at FL95 and up.

You got big lungs? Oxygen? Pressurised?

And you do have an ADF too? Bendix 12B (state of the art 1963)

And what do you expect as a result of being compliant? No side to this just innerested.

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 31st Jul 2009, 10:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can ATC clear you for a PRNAV procedure if they don't know your equipment fit ?
That's now how it works, AIUI.

A "PRNAV procedure" can only be a STAR, or possibly a SID.

The huge majority of (for example) high-end bizjets are not PRNAV approved, not to mention 99.99% of lighter GA.

That is why any such airport also has a conventional STAR, and the PRNAV one states on the plate "advise ATC if unable to comply".

The normal ATC procedure is to assume that the plane carries the required equipment.

If ATC at airports that have PRNAV terminal procedures do use the equipment list to decide whether to offer a PRNAV procedure, that would be quite a nice way to do it. But IME that is not how it works.
IO540 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.