Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

A barrel roll is NOT an aerobatic thing.....

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

A barrel roll is NOT an aerobatic thing.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jun 2009, 09:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Turkey
Age: 82
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the original post (which refers to an aileron roll - not barrel roll) - perhaps the whole thread should be removed just in case some idiot (or unsuspecting, unquestioning novice) believes it.
  1. A barrel roll is most definitely an aerobatic manoeuvre whether defined by Aresti or not.
  2. It can be flown in virtually any aircraft by a competent, properly trained pilot without stressing the aircraft.
  3. If not flown properly it is the biggest potential height loser of all aerobatic manoeuvres.
  4. If not flown properly (by even a small margin of error) it will result in high stresses that most non-aerobatic aircraft will not survive unscathed.
Having eye-witnessed Don Bullock's crass stupidity at Biggin Hill some years ago when he totalled his A26 Invader and all 7 occupants (narrowly avoiding a housing estate by luck, not judgement) I feel very strongly about this. Having trained RAF pilots I've seen a barrel roll, c*cked-up by over-confidence, lose 10,000ft in a Jet Provost (with a 6G recovery).

Please, just because you've seen a master like Bob Hoover do it with such panache and apparent ease, don't assume that it is easy. There are many factors to be considered. To mention just two:
  1. If the nose isn't high enough in the inverted, there will always be considerable height loss if the manoeuvre is continued.
  2. Control inputs and stick/(rudder) forces vary throughout the manoeuvre (unlike the steady aileron input of the aileron roll) - the whys and wherefores need to be fully understood before embarking on the exercise.
rodthesod is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 10:11
  #22 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,623
Received 64 Likes on 45 Posts
I entirely agree with rodthesod
Pilot DAR is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 11:13
  #23 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a Yak fatality at Bournemouth some years ago. Apparently on the last fly past the pilot decided to do a barrel roll over the airfield (close to the ground).....uh oh, guess what happened. Trouble is it is not just the pilot....
englishal is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2009, 14:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And to add, a barrel roll is not a +1G manoeuvre, it is a positive G manoeuvre. You have to have more than 1 G in the initial pull up and you have to have more than 1G during the pull out at the bottom. How much depends on exactly what others are speaking about here.

Yes it can be done in almost any aircraft, but if you do it in one that is not an aerobatic aircraft then you are a test pilot and I hope you have test pilot skills in order to ensure you do not stress the aircraft.

I reckon the barrel roll has to be one of, if not the most, misunderstood aerobatic manoeuvre out there. People who say it is only +1G have never flown one.

To do one at constant pitch and roll rates requires real skill. You will notice in the videos that Mr Hoover doesn't do a textbook barrel roll (and neither is his loops) they are modified to achieve the desired wow factor, whilst maintaining an acceptable degree of safety close to the ground (this by the way is what made Mr Hoover such a good air show and display pilot - he knew how to achieve the wow factor whilst still maintaining his own level of safety). Notice how he pulls up to between 45 and 60 degrees nose up before he begins his rolls, this means he will have a nice high nose attitude before he begins the rolls (feet on the horizon at least) but more importantly it means he will have very little if any height loss and it gives him plenty of room to adjust his pitch rate coming out of the manoeuvre to ensure he doesn't overstress the airframe but also have the pull up completed close to the ground for the extra wow factor. The same applies to the loops (most air show pilots do it), the loops aren't round, they are elliptical with the top of the loop abbreviated ie the pitch rate is increased so that during the pullout again you do not have to load the aircraft up to ensure you lose no height and can then adjust your rate of pitch to have the loop finishing close to the ground for the wow factor.

Anyway back to the barrel roll and topic at hand, it is most definitely an aerobatic manoeuvre, I believe the author was simply trying to state that it can be used to get out of an unusual attitude and was trying to get his audience to be less nervous about it by saying it is not an aerobatic manoeuvre. The latter is obviously wrong.

Cheers
CB
Cloud Basher is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.