Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

SEP renewal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th July 2009 | 15:40
  #21 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,402
Likes: 858
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
I agree with bose-x.

You have been ripped off. £20 for a few minutes with a pen is totally unreasonable.

Name and shame the club involved!!
BEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2009 | 19:33
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh
Thanks for the support chaps, one never knows these days.
Andy
acoulson is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 10:56
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: EGSS
Does anyone know whether it is possible to drop by the CAA to get the
SEP rating sorted same day (in case of SEP renewal ie expiry >5yrs)?
I seem to remember doing that with my Airbus rating...

If not, how long would it take by mail on average?

Cheers
Esteban
Dr Esteban is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 11:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
From: Oxford
Just picked up on this thread...

When I had my SEP revalidation signed off recently, the examiner was anxious I should send off the SRG1119 immediately. He said there had been a problem with examiners signing things retrospectively so it looked as though the revalidation was done in time when in fact it was late, so the CAA were suspicious if the form arrived a long time after the supposed date of revalidation.

On the question of charging for revalidation signature, it looks from this:

Flying Training Prices | Ultimate High

as though Ultimate High make such a charge. I sincerely hope not...

Tim
tmmorris is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 12:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I send all my srg1119 forms to the CAA as a batch once a month. The CAA do nothing with them.

If the CAA do not trust an examiner to follow the rules then they should pill his or het authority.

The system works on trust. Requiring examiners to operate to the laid down standards. If there is a problem then it comes out as a notex from the CFE. I have not seen anything that indicates the CAA believe there is a problem. Si your examiner was probably being paranoid.
S-Works is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.