Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

CAA prosecutions annual summary

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

CAA prosecutions annual summary

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Aug 2010, 08:02
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the CAA won't tell you
If you are interested I suspect an application under the Freedom of Information Act will produce a great deal of information - I dont see the CAA could redact much of the information on the basis of the exemptions available under the Act and the CAA are a public authority.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 08:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm interested by the "Fine £12000 Comp £5000" for "No Permit to Fly & Crossing international FIR boundary without filing a Flight Plan" which is the biggest penalty by quite a way. Anything to do with this I wonder?
bookworm is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 11:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I immediately thought it was that Long-EZ case, too....

Never saw anything on the net about him getting done though.
IO540 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 11:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: suffolk
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was him, he got well stitched by the CAA but succesfully appealed.( He is a friend of mine).
hatzflyer is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 12:32
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Can you comment on the appeal?
bookworm is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 12:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: suffolk
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Publicly only to say he won.

BTW it was a Verieze.
hatzflyer is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 13:26
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: england
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably it was the level of the fine that he appealed against, rather than the conviction (since he pleaded guilty), do you know what it was reduced to?
twelveoclockhigh is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 13:49
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was the mother of all diversions allright

Who was his appeal lawyer?
IO540 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 18:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably it was the level of the fine that he appealed against, rather than the conviction (since he pleaded guilty), do you know what it was reduced to?
The answer would be very interesting. I wonder if this has made the press in Switzerland...

It was him, he got well stitched by the CAA but succesfully appealed.
What did he get stitched for?

( He is a friend of mine).
There's a suprise

Last edited by IO540; 17th Aug 2010 at 19:15.
IO540 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2010, 20:04
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the published fine, before or after the appeal?
dublinpilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.