Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

PPL to Fast-Jet - CAA Permit to fly

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

PPL to Fast-Jet - CAA Permit to fly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th March 2009 | 18:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Frinton-on-Sea
PPL to Fast-Jet - CAA Permit to fly

Does anyone know where I can find a link to any CAA documents listing ex-military jets than can be flown in the civilian world (UK specific)?

Greg
Greg2041 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2009 | 19:17
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Frinton-on-Sea
Oops. Possibly should be in the military section but can't swop over. Sorry!
Greg2041 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2009 | 19:34
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: ...back of the drag curve
This may help:

CAP632
'Chuffer' Dandridge is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2009 | 20:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Frinton-on-Sea
Some interesting reading. Thank you.

Is there a document which specifies which ones actually have a permit to fly? I know the Hunter, Gnat and Provost are on the list but what about others?

Greg
Greg2041 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th March 2009 | 21:18
  #5 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 323
From: east ESSEX
L29/39/59/Iskra/Mig 15/17/21/Vampire/Venom/Meteor/Canberra/Gannet/SeaVixen/Tucano/Vulcan.....
sycamore is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2009 | 00:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: london
Don't think a MiG 21, L59 or Tucano has ever had a permit to fly. T33s and Sabres have though.

Link below shows a list of jet type rating exemptions, which is pretty much the same as a list of jets with permits to fly. Think a Bronco has also flown since.

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/224/CAP632...ING%202007.pdf
k12479 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2009 | 14:43
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Frinton-on-Sea
Thanks for the link k12479 . I guess we can all dream. Now back to my PPL MET studies.

Greg
Greg2041 is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2010 | 12:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: NE England
I understand the required hours for converting from a PPL to an ex military jet are circa 5 - 10 hours. Sounds incredibly low? From a 100kt spam can to a 300kt+ jet in 5 hours?

Nevertheless, is there a minimum number of required / recommended hours on SEP before converting to a ex-mil jet?

From what I can see, JP's seem the best, most (and I use the term loosely!) economical ex mil jets around at circa £300p/h for mk 3? But, they are old, no ejection seats, complex systems etc.

Any thoughts or advice?
VMC-on-top is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2010 | 15:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: England
Stand to be corrected, but I believe that for a time the RAF started their trainee pilots straight onto the Jet Provost rather than SEP.

Not sure how long this lasted or whether there may have been a short Chipmunk "screening" course before hand.
Fake Sealion is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2010 | 17:30
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 2
From: gamlingay
In the early 70s i joined the RAF with a PPL and 60 hrs on C150s through a flying scholarship and local flying club and bypassed the Chipmunk course and went straight onto the JP Mk 3.
It was however quite hard work!
culloden is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2010 | 20:36
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Frinton-on-Sea
And, I am told, very tight if you are more than 6ft tall. Out of interest, does the Hunter offer any more legroom?

I did sit in a Lightning once and boy was that tight.

Greg
Greg2041 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2010 | 12:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: England
I'm 6' 1" and found the Hunter quite roomy.
Fake Sealion is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2010 | 16:22
  #13 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Any thoughts or advice?
Insurance requirements are likely to play a large part in what you would or would not be permitted to do. To a certain extent this would be almost irrespective of the CAA's own requirements and potentially more restrictive.

For example, if you held a PPL but were a former RAF fast jet pilot, the insurer would probably take a more lenient view than if you were a 100 hour PPL with no prior experience.
Human Factor is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2010 | 16:58
  #14 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,116
Likes: 1,091
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Stand to be corrected, but I believe that for a time the RAF started their trainee pilots straight onto the Jet Provost rather than SEP.

Not sure how long this lasted or whether there may have been a short Chipmunk "screening" course before hand.
You are correct and there was no Chipmunk screening course before RAF training on JPs began. At least that was the case in the late 1970s when I went through the system.
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.