PA 38 spar life and engine
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PA 38 spar life and engine
Trying to find out a few things about tommy's
There is a spar life on them but I can't remember exactly how long it is. 8k hours seems to ring a bell.
Also the last time I was involved buying an engine it was through CSE in Oxford.
How much are LYCOMING O-235-L2C these days and where would you get one.
There is a spar life on them but I can't remember exactly how long it is. 8k hours seems to ring a bell.
Also the last time I was involved buying an engine it was through CSE in Oxford.
How much are LYCOMING O-235-L2C these days and where would you get one.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spar Life
MJ,
Lots of references to spar life for PA38 in Google, many references to the FAA type certificate stating 11,000 hours TIS(Time in Service). However I seem to remember my instructor telling me that there was a Spar modification which extended that life considerably.
Squawk
As a footnote, at HFS I was taught to land with stage one flap only ( never stage 2) specifically to go easy on the wingspars on bumpy days in particular!)
Lots of references to spar life for PA38 in Google, many references to the FAA type certificate stating 11,000 hours TIS(Time in Service). However I seem to remember my instructor telling me that there was a Spar modification which extended that life considerably.
Squawk
As a footnote, at HFS I was taught to land with stage one flap only ( never stage 2) specifically to go easy on the wingspars on bumpy days in particular!)
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tried Yahoo and all it came up with was bloody pprune threads.
will try google
There was a mod but you had to get it done before 2/3rds of the life or something like that.
O aye bog off IO there a cracking wee plane
That was a Pete theory which is no way backed up by any engineering fact. The wing loading is the same what ever flap setting you had it at all you do by using flap is alter the speed which said load is at and your attitude. The things were design to be landed at full flap and the fatigue life limits are set for that design load including gust factor. Any benefit to the structure will have been negated by the students day in day out planting them on the runway and trying to rip the wings off recovering from spiral dives and doing steep turn lesson 5-6 times a week.
It is more of the case though that if you don't have full flap on and the student pulls the power on you early the instructor has more time to sort the problem/ its easier to sort out before the impact with runway he probably started doing it after the nose gear collapsed accident. But it doesn't teach you how to fly and land the aircraft properly and fills your head with pseudo technical bollox
will try google
There was a mod but you had to get it done before 2/3rds of the life or something like that.
O aye bog off IO there a cracking wee plane
That was a Pete theory which is no way backed up by any engineering fact. The wing loading is the same what ever flap setting you had it at all you do by using flap is alter the speed which said load is at and your attitude. The things were design to be landed at full flap and the fatigue life limits are set for that design load including gust factor. Any benefit to the structure will have been negated by the students day in day out planting them on the runway and trying to rip the wings off recovering from spiral dives and doing steep turn lesson 5-6 times a week.
It is more of the case though that if you don't have full flap on and the student pulls the power on you early the instructor has more time to sort the problem/ its easier to sort out before the impact with runway he probably started doing it after the nose gear collapsed accident. But it doesn't teach you how to fly and land the aircraft properly and fills your head with pseudo technical bollox
Last edited by mad_jock; 25th Mar 2009 at 17:28.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The airframe is indeed lifed at 11,000 hours. I think it isn't a spar problem as such but a spar attachment issue. I believe that there is an STC that will extend the life, I think to 18,000 hours. A CAA DLS acquaintance of mine was working on getting the STC approved on behalf of a UK applicant (can't remember who that was) in the UK but that was 3 years ago. Either it'll be approved by now, or that applicant will have become pi$$ed off and withdrawn! My further recollection was that the mod would cost £5.5k+VAT. At today's airframe values I'd throw the bloody thing away and buy something else!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The wording re life limits on the PA38 is in the Maintenance Manual and in the Type Certificate Data Sheet:
'PA-38-112 - all S/N:
(a.) The service life of the wing and associated structure has been established as 11,000 hours time-in-service.'
'Associated structure' - is normally taken to be the carry through spar/frames in the centre fuselage.
There is a mod out to re-life the spars but it isn't cheap, not sure if it is EASA approved.
If you want a factory engine, go through Piper & CSP Parts at Shoreham, if you want an engine overhauled, try Nicholson-McLaren Aviation in Wokingham.
'PA-38-112 - all S/N:
(a.) The service life of the wing and associated structure has been established as 11,000 hours time-in-service.'
'Associated structure' - is normally taken to be the carry through spar/frames in the centre fuselage.
There is a mod out to re-life the spars but it isn't cheap, not sure if it is EASA approved.
If you want a factory engine, go through Piper & CSP Parts at Shoreham, if you want an engine overhauled, try Nicholson-McLaren Aviation in Wokingham.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Front of Beyond
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The service life of the wing and associated structure has been established as 11,000 hours time-in-service.'
Brooklands
*No, they've not been deregistered, at least not when I checked just now
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Inverness-shire
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there really a big and abrupt section change in the normal spar as shown on that spar mod link? My old engineering teachers wouldn't have given me many marks for a design with such a stress concentrating step in it!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its fairly typical of American engineering of that day. And tapered sections of composite beams weren't as easy to manufacture as they are today. But then again I was a common FEA stress engineer there could be a heap of factors that I haven't a clue about with aero design.
All that mod does is put a fillet in the stress concentration and put the bulk of the load onto some fresh metal.
All that mod does is put a fillet in the stress concentration and put the bulk of the load onto some fresh metal.