Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Stuck!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th February 2009 | 12:09
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I guess I just read correctly into the question rather than interpreting it to literally. I guess sometimes it pays to have an open mind.

I'm coming around to the view this is a wind up. But just on the off-chance you really didn't know, bose-x, density altitude is pressure altitude corrected for non-standard temperature. Oh, BTW, density altitude is what we use in performance calculations ... so performance calculations require the input of pressure altitude ... oh, WTF

Indeed but the question was not around performance it was a pretty simple question that it seems had a typo in it. Thanks for the condescending lecture though.

I just applied logic to see around the typo it appears some were unable to.
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 13:51
  #62 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 847
From: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
I just applied logic to see around the typo it appears some were unable to.


In instructor parlance we call that statement "a justification"
Checkboard is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 14:14
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: An island somewhere
I just applied logic to see around the typo it appears some were unable to.
Just out of interest, how come the logic you applied to 'see around the typo' got you a different answer to their's (which was 338ft)?

Only asking, as they say.

As you observed, it was a pretty simple question ... so the inability of an instructor to distinguish between QFE and QNH seems rather fundamental, especially after the error he was making had been pointed out on several occasions.

Last edited by Islander2; 17th February 2009 at 14:39.
Islander2 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 16:41
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
I got the same answer as them and gave the correct math for the problem. Perhaps I read the question in the right context rather than looking at it dogmatically. So I would probably say it is the ability of an Instructor to look at the big picture...

However as my teenagers say - 'whatever'......

Originally Posted by BoseX
1013-992 = 21mb

21mb x 30 = 630ft

630 + 968 = 1598ft
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 16:52
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: An island somewhere
I got the same answer as them
Ermm, no. As DaveD said in response to your answer:

PPLQUIZ said 338 was the right answer
Islander2 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 18:03
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
Not what he says below:

But like I said whatever, we will have to agree to disagree.


Originally Posted by "DaveD
JUSTICE!

Sent an email to PPLQUIZ explaining my predicament with this question.

Dave

Thank you for your email.

You are correct, the question has now been changed to read:

An aerodrome elevation is 968ft and the QNH is 992mb, what is the
aerodrome pressure altitude? (1mb = 30ft).

With the answer being 1598ft

30 x 21 = 630ft

The QNH is lower than 1013 so you have to wind the Altimeter up to get
to 1013 so:

968 + 630 = 1598ft

Hope this make sense.

Most of our questions come from student feedback, which you can enter
yourself by going to the Feedback page.

If in the future you do come across a question which you feel needed
challenging please use the ID box on the top right hand side so we can
locate the question easier.

Kind regards

PPLQuiz
S-Works is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 18:05
  #67 (permalink)  
ft
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: N. Europe
ATC: ”B-OX, descend and maintain 3000 feet, QFE 995”

B-OX: ”3000 ft, QFE 995, B-OX”

(Thinking: Hey, QFE? They always give QNH around here… and I have an open mind, so I’ll just correct that without pointing out their obvious mistake, without declaring my own assumption and without interpreting things too literally. Lesse… they want me 3000 feet above AD elevation, and the AD is at 1400 feet. Allright, here we go, level off at 4400 feet. Man I’m on top of things!)

AAIB: ”A Piper PA28 and a B737 collided after a private pilot with an open mind failed to comply with ATC instructions in a non-radar environment. Five crew members and 78 passengers onboard the B737 were killed, along with the open-minded private pilot.”

Literally is how we do things in this industry. It is a method of reaching old age which has been proven time and time again. If something does not make sense taken literally, we question it but do not, repeat, do not go off acting upon our own assumptions.

And if we mess up, we call the tower upon landing on the telephone number they kindly provided, apologize and admit our mistake. After all, we are all human and we all make mistakes. Trying to deny having made a mistake is generally not a good idea, especially if it is on record.
ft is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 19:03
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: UK,Twighlight Zone
Oh god.....
S-Works is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.