Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

What does this metar mean ?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

What does this metar mean ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jan 2009, 11:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Pompey till I die
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Guildford
Age: 51
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does this metar mean ?

EGLF 101220Z 25005KT 1600 R24/P1500 BCFG BR OVC002 M04/M04 Q1027

I've not seen R24/P1500 before ? Is it runway 24 visibility 1500m ? If so how is that different from RVR ? I looked at the glossary but can't see anything for it.
PompeyPaul is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 11:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Scotland
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R24 is an RVR figure for runway 24; the "P" stands for "increasing."

1600 is the Met Vis.

Met Visibility and RVRs are measured by seperate methods. The two are not expected to be equal.
Kiltie is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 12:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hither and Thither
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P does not stand for increasing!!
It indicates the RVR is in excess of the maximum that can be read for a particular runway.
D (decreasing), U (increasing) not presently used in UK, but are in rest of Europe. There is also a code for staying the same (which I cannot recall at present).
Red Four is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 13:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P1500=Runway Visual range greater than 1500metres. The RVR is measured by a set of either visual lights or elecronically by a set of transmisometers set along the edge of the runway.......the aerodrome visibility may often be differant from the runway visibility. RVR's are usually also quoted for Touchdown, midpoint and stop end.
fisbangwollop is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 23:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It means it's time for numbnuts to stay on the ground and drink tea.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 23:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Often abbreviated as NNSOGADT
flybymike is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2009, 23:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So that explains something else on the METARS and TAFs.

P.s. If I were being picky I'd say transmissometers has 4 Ss in it.

P.p.s. PS on a METAR = Pea Soup??
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2009, 01:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or simply PS = Pretty Sh*tty.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 00:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, WA
Age: 85
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Metar means we lost our old airways code which was just like a favorite pair of slippers. I know, we were probably the only country out of step but I still miss it.
olderndirt is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 09:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: one dot low as usual
Age: 66
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As R4 says, it means greater than 1500m. That is the upper range of most transmissometers used so it just means that they are using them as well as tower visibility (1600m in this example) to back up the vis report.
Fright Level is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 14:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RVR is given only when horizontal visibility (or RVR itself) is less then 1500m. If RVR is more than this 1500m. a P is added in front. Here R24/P1500.

When letters are shown after this it indicates a trend over a period of 10 mins, as correctly said by Red Four.

"There is also a code for staying the same (which I cannot recall at present)."

It is then P1500N
FDR man is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2009, 11:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hunched over a keyboard
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely there's no need to include the RVR in this METAR?

For one, at 1600m met vis then there are unlikely to be many instrument approach restrictions and second an RVR which is LOWER than the met vis (because the RVR can't read greater than 1500m) is about as useful as the proverbial chocolate teapot.

By the way, I did see chocolate teapots for sale in a sweet shop in Le Touquet a couple of years ago - I have a picture somewhere.
moggiee is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2009, 13:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: EGPT/ESVS
Posts: 755
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...at 1600m met vis then there are unlikely to be many instrument approach restrictions ...
In this case the METAR also states BCFG (fog patches) - and it's RVRs that we use for approach minima - sod's law says that the fog patch will be just where you don't want it - at the RVR transmissometer
Floppy Link is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2009, 13:41
  #14 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The rules for METAR coding in the UK (which do not include all reported elements that are possible) are published in CAP 746.

On the basis of these rules the METAR in question appears to be incorrect in that the RVR value should not have been included.

The relevant extracts from CAP 746 are:
  • The RVR group shall be reported in the METAR only when either the minimum visibility or the runway visual range is observed to be less than 1500 metres.
  • 2000 metres should be regarded as the maximum value that is possible to report. If the actual value is greater than can be reported by the runway visual range equipment or human observed method, the maximum value shall be preceded by ‘P’.
However, the rules for reporting IRVR to aircraft by ATC are slightly different. CAP 493 (a.k.a. MATS Part 1) says:
IRVR reporting to aircraft is started:
a) whenever the aerodrome meteorological report shows the visibility to be less than 1500 metres;
b) whenever the IRVR display is indicating an RVR value equal to or less than the maximum for that system;
c) whenever shallow fog is reported and during a period for which it is forecast.
So it looks like the METAR has been coded up using the rules for passing IRVR reports to aircraft by ATC.
 
Old 27th Jan 2011, 09:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TAF AMD KRIV 2705/2804 05012KT 9999 SKC WSCONDS QNH3008INS
BECMG 2716/2717 03009KT 9999 SCT200 QNH3011INS WND 320V070
TEMPO 2720/2801 03012G18KT
BECMG 2801/2802 VRB06KT 9999 SCT200 QNH3004INS T21/2721Z
T03/2715Z AMD 270511=

Can anyone explain to me what QNH3008INS means? Firtly, why is there a 3 in there? Secondly what does that INS mean?

Finally. T21/2721Z. Is that like saying temperature is 21 at 21 Zulu on 27th?

Thanks
Krits is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 09:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My best guess is that the QNH is 30.08 inches? I don't think TAFs incude temperatures do they?
The500man is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 09:13
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh crap. Thats right. I've been looking at QNH's in Hpa all day that I completely forgot about Inches in Mg. Whoops.

Why can't everyone just use the same damn thing.
Krits is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 09:22
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
30 point 08 inches of mercury I believe? How that is converted to Millibars I can't remember.
Edit: everyone beat me to it (must learn to type)
Crash one is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 09:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, got that. But any idea what INS stands for?

EDIT: And since it is given in Inches of MG. Shouldn't it have been preceded with an "A" instead of a "Q"?
Krits is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 09:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
INS = Inches
Crash one is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.