Part M - Owners and Subpart G/F companies watch out
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,120
Received 2,959 Likes
on
1,263 Posts
Funningly enough mine excepted that if i remember......... don't forget to ADD REIMS IF DOING CESSNA AS THEY DO NOT COUNT AS CESSNA, because they are built in France....... had that enquiry about a mod that was on a Reims 182 not being accepted on a US built one as a minor mod as it is a different make, but the same aircraft!.
Rumour control has LAMP being eventually ditched too
Rumour control has LAMP being eventually ditched too
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No.. but as mentioned elsewhere, the problem with Robins is that so many are in commercial use.
If its just taking the money for instruction, then a national C of A would not be a problem at the moment, if its under an AOC then the game could well be over.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Not a million miles from EGTF
Age: 68
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite -
It seems that EASA haven't really thought through the rules for this sort of thing, and they'll be making them up as they go along - just as they have done with Part M.
Of course, add to that our CAA rushing in with an early implementation of incomplete rules when they know full well they will be changed again........
It seems that EASA haven't really thought through the rules for this sort of thing, and they'll be making them up as they go along - just as they have done with Part M.
Of course, add to that our CAA rushing in with an early implementation of incomplete rules when they know full well they will be changed again........
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
don't forget to ADD REIMS IF DOING CESSNA AS THEY DO NOT COUNT AS CESSNA, because they are built in France.......
I think you would only need to add (eg) Cessna 172/F172?
LAMP going? I hope so - whats the point of it when you have to use the manufacturers data anyway!
clear as mud!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Malcolm
I think that you will find that if the aircraft is on an AOC it is commercial.
Flying schools do not normally have their aircraft on an AOC therefore not Commercial.
As for the rules of Part M, I took and paid for training last year to write maintenance programmes and to be an Independent IRC signatory but they have changed the rules and I have wasted my money.
As to the Subpart F and G manuals I have been involved with 3 different CAA Local offices and yes they appear to be making it up as they go along.
I think that you will find that if the aircraft is on an AOC it is commercial.
Flying schools do not normally have their aircraft on an AOC therefore not Commercial.
As for the rules of Part M, I took and paid for training last year to write maintenance programmes and to be an Independent IRC signatory but they have changed the rules and I have wasted my money.
As to the Subpart F and G manuals I have been involved with 3 different CAA Local offices and yes they appear to be making it up as they go along.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dg93
I think you will find that is what I was alluding to when I said
As for Part M............
I think that you will find that if the aircraft is on an AOC it is commercial.
Flying schools do not normally have their aircraft on an AOC therefore not Commercial.
Flying schools do not normally have their aircraft on an AOC therefore not Commercial.
Commercial as in AOC or as in just taking money for instruction?
As for Part M............
