Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Piper Aircraft in Trouble?

Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Piper Aircraft in Trouble?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Nov 2008, 12:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Piper Aircraft in Trouble?

Heard unsubstantiated rumours and read a couple of things on here.

Anyone know the full story?
julian_storey is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2008, 13:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can you state your sources? I heard no such thing
vanHorck is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2008, 14:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read it in the press somewhere.

But, everybody is in "trouble" right now.
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2008, 14:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't surprise me. Even BMW are "in trouble".
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2008, 18:48
  #5 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Daimler-Chrysler are in real poo! My new Merc is now months away from delivery due to them shutting down production this weekend until after Xmas.

Last man standing wil reap all the rewards.

Hope Piper survive as I'm warming to there new Jet despite early Miss Giviens.

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 29th Nov 2008, 19:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Piper has not been selling any significant piston volumes for many years. They are basically a massive spare parts operation, which will probably keep them in the money for another 20 years before the PA28 fleet gets scrapped, and they sell the occassional turboprop.

The Piper Jet is just a Malibu airframe with a jet engine on top. Nothing revolutionary. There isn't anybody at Piper doing anything revolutionary.
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2008, 21:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is true that they are a cautious company. I m keeping my fingers crossed that this will help their survival.

Whilst the airframe looks very much like the Malibu, the wings seems totally new.

If I could afford a single engine jet, I d certainly prefer a company like Piper to one of the newbies!
vanHorck is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 09:34
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by IO540
Piper has not been selling any significant piston volumes for many years. They are basically a massive spare parts operation, which will probably keep them in the money for another 20 years before the PA28 fleet gets scrapped, and they sell the occassional turboprop.

The Piper Jet is just a Malibu airframe with a jet engine on top. Nothing revolutionary. There isn't anybody at Piper doing anything revolutionary.
It's not usually in the nature of big companies to do radical things -that does tend to fall to smaller newer companies who have a lot less to lose. What big companies however sometimes then do is buy up the successful smaller companies (as of course Cessna recently did with Columbia) once the risks have been taken already. Seems a bit parasitic, but it's fairly standard in any business environment.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 09:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a handful of companies in aviation that have innovated and survived. Innovation and aviation are not natural bed fellows and usually a quick way to going bust.

The best models combine the best of current technology from proven parts bins blended into one package.

Prove me wrong if you can?
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 10:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the aviation newsmedia in October, Piper have enjoyed nice success this year with the new Matrix and have had perhaps their best time since the 2004 floodings.

Obviously the financial meltdown must have hit Piper as it has hit all other GA manufacturers. But the company website has no news about layoffs yet.

Looking ahead it would be only natural to be cautious and maybe slow down the PiperJet development. Also if many (Matrix) customers cancel their orders the situation might turn worse. But that would probably affect all manufacturers about equally.
snowfalcon2 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 10:32
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Age: 52
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But they are not the only ones. PIPER appears to be in serious difficulty and has been unable to re-finance. I am told that if they survive Christmas it will be a good result.
The above was posted in the PPRUNE Biz Jet forum. May not be reliable of course.
julian_storey is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 17:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The days of the gas guzzling dinosaur is coming to an end. Say a prayer for them and haste their speed to the happy hunting ground. The future is plastic fantastic, with a rotax engine.... and about time.
JohnHarris is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 18:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are joking I take it.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 18:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure he isn't, but the rest of us know the picture
IO540 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2008, 21:30
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have replaced the motor in my Moulimex with a Rotax - does that count?
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 10:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the north
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder when the dinosaurs became aware that extinction was inevitable ?
bingoboy is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 12:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: london
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that in the future, the club trainers/local bimblers will go down the rotax plastic-fantastic or czech airworks route - principally because these are now so good and so economical.

However, if you want a true 4 seat family tourer, and want to go IFR, there is still no credible substitute for stone-aged technology. Diamond have had a good go at this and, until their new engine is proven (and the customers have had an opportunity to do the product development...) the jury is still out as to whether they have succeeded.

The Tecnam 2006 looks wonderful - if you can get that on a public transport c of a (or easa version of) that looks a really terrific A/C.

As for Piper being in trouble, er, who amongst us isn't?
wsmempson is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 16:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If there was one thing Piper could improve on, it would be their news section.

I will agree that the information on the development of the piper jet and everything else in their company is too limited.

At least one press release on their website every 2 weeks would go a long way to proving the company is active, including a statement about how the crunch affects them, numbers of craft sold or produced, innovations etc etc

But assuming they are as conservative on their financing as they are on their sharing of information, i still think they are the best safest bet alongside Cessna for anyone ready to fork out on several hundred thousand pounds of flying kit
vanHorck is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 17:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wsmempson
However, if you want a true 4 seat family tourer, and want to go IFR, there is still no credible substitute for stone-aged technology.
Not at all, there is always Easyjet/Ryanair for that, why ever did you think the bully boys are scrapping the fog rating?
JohnHarris is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2008, 07:55
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: relocating to UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
till know they are not creating problems to supply spare parts.
cvlux is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.